PURPOSE: Practice-based research networks (PBRNs) provide an important approach to implementing primary care research at the community level, thus increasing the relevance and utility of research findings for routine primary care practices. PBRNs expend considerable time and energy in the recruitment, engagement, and retention of network clinicians and practices to establish this community-based primary care research laboratory. This study assessed factors motivating PBRN clinicians to participate and stay involved in practice-based research in their primary care office setting. METHODS: We invited practicing clinicians across the United States who are affiliated with a PBRN to share their stories regarding motivations to participate in practice-based research. Using qualitative methods, we categorized the stories into the main motivation for participation and the perceived impact of participation. RESULTS: We collected 37 stories from clinicians affiliated with 12 PBRNS located in 14 states. Motivations for participation in practice-based research included themes associated with personal satisfaction, improving local clinic-based care, and contributing to community- and system-level improvements. Sources of personal satisfaction corresponded to the 3 psychological needs postulated by Deci's and Ryan's Self-Determination Theory: competence, autonomy, and relatedness. CONCLUSIONS: These stories from PBRN clinicians describe the values, motivations, and unique paths that clinicians took as they chose to participate and stay active in a PBRN. Their voices have the potential to influence others to participate in practice-based research.
PURPOSE: Practice-based research networks (PBRNs) provide an important approach to implementing primary care research at the community level, thus increasing the relevance and utility of research findings for routine primary care practices. PBRNs expend considerable time and energy in the recruitment, engagement, and retention of network clinicians and practices to establish this community-based primary care research laboratory. This study assessed factors motivating PBRN clinicians to participate and stay involved in practice-based research in their primary care office setting. METHODS: We invited practicing clinicians across the United States who are affiliated with a PBRN to share their stories regarding motivations to participate in practice-based research. Using qualitative methods, we categorized the stories into the main motivation for participation and the perceived impact of participation. RESULTS: We collected 37 stories from clinicians affiliated with 12 PBRNS located in 14 states. Motivations for participation in practice-based research included themes associated with personal satisfaction, improving local clinic-based care, and contributing to community- and system-level improvements. Sources of personal satisfaction corresponded to the 3 psychological needs postulated by Deci's and Ryan's Self-Determination Theory: competence, autonomy, and relatedness. CONCLUSIONS: These stories from PBRN clinicians describe the values, motivations, and unique paths that clinicians took as they chose to participate and stay active in a PBRN. Their voices have the potential to influence others to participate in practice-based research.
Authors: William M Tierney; Caitlin C Oppenheimer; Brenda L Hudson; Jennifer Benz; Amy Finn; John M Hickner; David Lanier; Daniel S Gaylin Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2007 May-Jun Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Laura M Dember; Patrick Archdeacon; Mahesh Krishnan; Eduardo Lacson; Shari M Ling; Prabir Roy-Chaudhury; Kimberly A Smith; Michael F Flessner Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2016-07-11 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Julie A Gorzkowski; Jonathan D Klein; Donna L Harris; Kristen R Kaseeska; Regina M Whitmore Shaefer; Alison B Bocian; James B Davis; Edward M Gotlieb; Richard C Wasserman Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2014-09-01 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Amanda E Hoffmann; Erin K Leege; Mary Beth Plane; Katherine A Judge; Amy L Irwin; Regina M Vidaver; David L Hahn Journal: J Am Board Fam Med Date: 2015 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 2.657
Authors: Frederick A Curro; Ashley C Grill; Van P Thompson; Ronald G Craig; Don Vena; Analia V Keenan; Frederick Naftolin Journal: J Dent Educ Date: 2011-08 Impact factor: 2.264
Authors: Michelle D Hamilton; Philip A Cola; Joshua J Terchek; James J Werner; Kurt C Stange Journal: J Am Board Fam Med Date: 2011 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 2.657
Authors: John Heintzman; Sonja Likumahuwa; Christine Nelson; M Patrice Eiff; Rachel Gold; Joseph E Carroll; John Muench; Christian Hill; Meena Mital; Jennifer E DeVoe Journal: Fam Med Date: 2014-02 Impact factor: 1.756
Authors: Daniel M Hartung; Jeanne-Marie Guise; Lyle J Fagnan; Melinda M Davis; Kurt C Stange Journal: J Comp Eff Res Date: 2012-01 Impact factor: 1.744
Authors: David E Demik; Mark W Vander Weg; Emily S Lundt; Christopher S Coffey; Gail Ardery; Barry L Carter Journal: Res Social Adm Pharm Date: 2013-03-16