Literature DB >> 20616081

Absence of NMDA receptors in dopamine neurons attenuates dopamine release but not conditioned approach during Pavlovian conditioning.

Jones G Parker1, Larry S Zweifel, Jeremy J Clark, Scott B Evans, Paul E M Phillips, Richard D Palmiter.   

Abstract

During Pavlovian conditioning, phasic dopamine (DA) responses emerge to reward-predictive stimuli as the subject learns to anticipate reward delivery. This observation has led to the hypothesis that phasic dopamine signaling is important for learning. To assess the ability of mice to develop anticipatory behavior and to characterize the contribution of dopamine, we used a food-reinforced Pavlovian conditioning paradigm. As mice learned the cue-reward association, they increased their head entries to the food receptacle in a pattern that was consistent with conditioned anticipatory behavior. D1-receptor knockout (D1R-KO) mice had impaired acquisition, and systemic administration of a D1R antagonist blocked both the acquisition and expression of conditioned approach in wild-type mice. To assess the specific contribution of phasic dopamine transmission, we tested mice lacking NMDA-type glutamate receptors (NMDARs) exclusively in dopamine neurons (NR1-KO mice). Surprisingly, NR1-KO mice learned at the same rate as their littermate controls. To evaluate the contribution of NMDARs to phasic dopamine release in this paradigm, we performed fast-scan cyclic voltammetry in the nucleus accumbens of awake mice. Despite having significantly attenuated phasic dopamine release following reward delivery, KO mice developed cue-evoked dopamine release at the same rate as controls. We conclude that NMDARs in dopamine neurons enhance but are not critical for phasic dopamine release to behaviorally relevant stimuli; furthermore, their contribution to phasic dopamine signaling is not necessary for the development of cue-evoked dopamine or anticipatory activity in a D1R-dependent Pavlovian conditioning paradigm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20616081      PMCID: PMC2922155          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1007827107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  35 in total

1.  Individual differences in the propensity to approach signals vs goals promote different adaptations in the dopamine system of rats.

Authors:  Shelly B Flagel; Stanley J Watson; Terry E Robinson; Huda Akil
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2006-09-14       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Reward-predictive cues enhance excitatory synaptic strength onto midbrain dopamine neurons.

Authors:  Garret D Stuber; Marianne Klanker; Bram de Ridder; M Scott Bowers; Ruud N Joosten; Matthijs G Feenstra; Antonello Bonci
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-09-19       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 3.  A neural substrate of prediction and reward.

Authors:  W Schultz; P Dayan; P R Montague
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-03-14       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  A molecular dissociation between cued and contextual appetitive learning.

Authors:  Mazen A Kheirbek; Jeff A Beeler; Wanhao Chi; Yoshihiro Ishikawa; Xiaoxi Zhuang
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 2.460

5.  Synaptic overflow of dopamine in the nucleus accumbens arises from neuronal activity in the ventral tegmental area.

Authors:  Leslie A Sombers; Manna Beyene; Regina M Carelli; R Mark Wightman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-02-11       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  The temporal precision of reward prediction in dopamine neurons.

Authors:  Christopher D Fiorillo; William T Newsome; Wolfram Schultz
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 24.884

7.  Disconnection of the anterior cingulate cortex and nucleus accumbens core impairs Pavlovian approach behavior: further evidence for limbic cortical-ventral striatopallidal systems.

Authors:  J A Parkinson; P J Willoughby; T W Robbins; B J Everitt
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 1.912

Review 8.  Behavioral dopamine signals.

Authors:  Wolfram Schultz
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2007-04-02       Impact factor: 13.837

9.  Chronic microsensors for longitudinal, subsecond dopamine detection in behaving animals.

Authors:  Jeremy J Clark; Stefan G Sandberg; Matthew J Wanat; Jerylin O Gan; Eric A Horne; Andrew S Hart; Christina A Akers; Jones G Parker; Ingo Willuhn; Vicente Martinez; Scott B Evans; Nephi Stella; Paul E M Phillips
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2009-12-27       Impact factor: 28.547

10.  Effects of selective excitotoxic lesions of the nucleus accumbens core, anterior cingulate cortex, and central nucleus of the amygdala on autoshaping performance in rats.

Authors:  Rudolf N Cardinal; John A Parkinson; Guillaume Lachenal; Katherine M Halkerston; Nung Rudarakanchana; Jeremy Hall; Caroline H Morrison; Simon R Howes; Trevor W Robbins; Barry J Everitt
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 1.912

View more
  46 in total

Review 1.  Dopamine in motivational control: rewarding, aversive, and alerting.

Authors:  Ethan S Bromberg-Martin; Masayuki Matsumoto; Okihide Hikosaka
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2010-12-09       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Contributions of nucleus accumbens dopamine to cognitive flexibility.

Authors:  Anna K Radke; Adrina Kocharian; Dan P Covey; David M Lovinger; Joseph F Cheer; Yolanda Mateo; Andrew Holmes
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 3.386

3.  Sustained N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor hypofunction remodels the dopamine system and impairs phasic signaling.

Authors:  Mark J Ferris; Marija Milenkovic; Shuai Liu; Catharine A Mielnik; Pieter Beerepoot; Carrie E John; Rodrigo A España; Tatyana D Sotnikova; Raul R Gainetdinov; Stephanie L Borgland; Sara R Jones; Amy J Ramsey
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 3.386

Review 4.  The mysterious motivational functions of mesolimbic dopamine.

Authors:  John D Salamone; Mercè Correa
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Bursting for exploration.

Authors:  Joaquim Alves da Silva; Rui M Costa
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 6.  Individual variation in resisting temptation: implications for addiction.

Authors:  Benjamin T Saunders; Terry E Robinson
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 8.989

7.  Unbalanced neuronal circuits in addiction.

Authors:  Nora D Volkow; Gen-Jack Wang; Dardo Tomasi; Ruben D Baler
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 6.627

8.  Failure of Standard Training Sets in the Analysis of Fast-Scan Cyclic Voltammetry Data.

Authors:  Justin A Johnson; Nathan T Rodeberg; R Mark Wightman
Journal:  ACS Chem Neurosci       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 4.418

9.  Dopamine dependency for acquisition and performance of Pavlovian conditioned response.

Authors:  Martin Darvas; Amanda M Wunsch; Jeffrey T Gibbs; Richard D Palmiter
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Pontomesencephalic Tegmental Afferents to VTA Non-dopamine Neurons Are Necessary for Appetitive Pavlovian Learning.

Authors:  Hau-Jie Yau; Dong V Wang; Jen-Hui Tsou; Yi-Fang Chuang; Billy T Chen; Karl Deisseroth; Satoshi Ikemoto; Antonello Bonci
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 9.423

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.