Literature DB >> 20615648

Improving quality of cancer care through surgical audit.

W van Gijn1, C J H van de Velde.   

Abstract

Quality of healthcare is a hot topic and this is especially true for cancer care. New surgical techniques and effective neoadjuvant treatment regimens have significantly improved colorectal cancer outcome. Nevertheless, there seem to be substantial differences in quality of care between European countries, hospitals and doctors. To reduce hospital variation, most initiatives aim on selective referral, encouraging patients to seek care in high-volume hospitals, where cancer care is concentrated to site-specialist multidisciplinary teams. As an alternative to volume-based referral, hospitals and surgeons can also improve their results by learning from their own outcome statistics and those from colleagues treating a similar patient group. European national audit registries in surgical oncology have led to improvements with a greater impact on survival than any of the adjuvant therapies currently under study. Moreover, they offer the possibility to perform research on patient groups that are usually excluded from clinical trials. Nevertheless, between European countries remain differences in outcome and treatment schedules that cannot be easily explained. The European CanCer Organisation (ECCO) has recognised these importances and created the 'European Registration of Cancer Care' (EURECCA) framework to develop a European colorectal audit structure. EURECCA will advance future treatment improvements and spread these to all European cancer patients. It provides opportunities to treat elderly and comorbid patients evidence based while it offers an unique insight in social-economical healthcare matters such as the consequences of commercialisation, treatment availability and screening initiatives. As such, ECCO has established the basis for a strong, multidisciplinary audit structure with the commitment to improve cancer care for every European cancer patient. Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20615648     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2010.06.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0748-7983            Impact factor:   4.424


  10 in total

Review 1.  Surgery for rectal cancer-what is on the horizon?

Authors:  Thomas A Vermeer; Ricardo G Orsini; Harm J T Rutten
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 5.075

2.  International quality assurance project in colorectal cancer-unifying diagnostic and histopathological evaluation.

Authors:  O Jannasch; A Udelnow; G Romano; A Dziki; D Pavalkis; H Lippert; P Mroczkowski
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  Evaluating the quality of colorectal cancer care across the interface of healthcare sectors.

Authors:  Sabine Ludt; Elisabeth Urban; Jörg Eckardt; Stefanie Wache; Björn Broge; Petra Kaufmann-Kolle; Günther Heller; Antje Miksch; Katharina Glassen; Katja Hermann; Regine Bölter; Dominik Ose; Stephen M Campbell; Michel Wensing; Joachim Szecsenyi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Inclusion and analysis of older adults in RCTs.

Authors:  W Van de Water; E Bastiaannet; C J H Van de Velde; G J Liefers
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Deriving stage at diagnosis from multiple population-based sources: colorectal and lung cancer in England.

Authors:  S Benitez-Majano; H Fowler; C Maringe; C Di Girolamo; B Rachet
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  Clinical practice guidelines for the surgical management of colon cancer: a consensus statement of the Hellenic and Cypriot Colorectal Cancer Study Group by the HeSMO.

Authors:  Evaghelos Xynos; Nikolaos Gouvas; Charina Triantopoulou; Paris Tekkis; Louiza Vini; Maria Tzardi; Ioannis Boukovinas; Nikolaos Androulakis; Athanasios Athanasiadis; Christos Christodoulou; Evangelia Chrysou; Christos Dervenis; Christos Emmanouilidis; Panagiotis Georgiou; Ourania Katopodi; Panteleimon Kountourakis; Thomas Makatsoris; Pavlos Papakostas; Demetris Papamichael; Georgios Pentheroudakis; Ioannis Pilpilidis; Joseph Sgouros; Vassilios Vassiliou; Spyridon Xynogalos; Nikolaos Ziras; Niki Karachaliou; Odysseas Zoras; Christos Agalianos; John Souglakos
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar

7.  The Canadian Partnership Against Cancer Rectal Cancer Project: Protocol for a Pan-Canadian, Multidisciplinary Quality Improvement Initiative to Optimize the Quality of Rectal Cancer Care.

Authors:  Amandeep Pooni; Selina Schmocker; Carl Brown; Anthony MacLean; Lara Williams; Nancy N Baxter; Marko Simunovic; Alexander Sender Liberman; Sebastien Drolet; Katerina Neumann; Kartik Jhaveri; Richard Kirsch; Erin Diane Kennedy
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2020-01-29

8.  Quality indicators of clinical cancer care (QC3) in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Valentina Bianchi; Alessandra Spitale; Laura Ortelli; Luca Mazzucchelli; Andrea Bordoni
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Influence of data quality on computed Dutch hospital quality indicators: a case study in colorectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  Kathrin Dentler; Ronald Cornet; Annette ten Teije; Pieter Tanis; Jean Klinkenbijl; Kristien Tytgat; Nicolette de Keizer
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 2.796

Review 10.  The modern anatomical surgical approach to localised rectal cancer.

Authors:  R G Orsini; T Wiggers; M C DeRuiter; P Quirke; R G Beets-Tan; C J van de Velde; H J T Rutten
Journal:  EJC Suppl       Date:  2013-09
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.