Literature DB >> 20615317

Safety of a rush immunotherapy build-up schedule with depigmented polymerized allergen extracts.

Randolf Brehler1, Ludger Klimek, Oliver Pfaar, Bettina Hauswald, Margitta Worm, Thomas Bieber.   

Abstract

Conventional subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) for allergy treatment needs several injections over several weeks to reach the maintenance dose. Shorter up-dosing regimens are desired but limited by the potential of side effects. This study was designed to compare the safety of Depigoid (Laboratorios LETI, Spain)-SCIT 1 day versus 3 weeks up-dosing in patients with Type 1 allergy caused by clinically relevant sensitization against tree pollen, grass pollen, and house-dust mites. A total of 303 patients with confirmed allergic rhinitis/conjunctivitis were included. A rush build-up schedule administering 0.2 mL and then 0.3 mL of the concentrate at day 1 followed by 0.5 mL at day 28 was compared with a conventional 4-week build-up schedule. The number of patients reaching the maintenance phase without systemic reactions or major deviation from treatment schedule were compared. Of the rush 91.8% and in the conventional group 90.9% reached the maintenance phase without dose modification. Neither the proportions of patients with systemic reactions (5.8% rush versus 2% conventional) nor the proportions of patients with local reactions differed significantly between the two regimens (24% rush versus 11% conventional). There was no difference with respect to the applied allergen group. The proposed rush build-up schedule for the immunotherapy treatment with depigmented allergoids without premedication is safe and not inferior to the conventional schedule.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20615317     DOI: 10.2500/aap.2010.31.3334

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Allergy Asthma Proc        ISSN: 1088-5412            Impact factor:   2.587


  8 in total

Review 1.  Accelerated immunotherapy schedules.

Authors:  Christopher W Calabria
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.806

2.  Safety and effect on reported symptoms of depigmented polymerized allergen immunotherapy: a retrospective study of 2927 paediatric patients.

Authors:  Oliver Pfaar; Angelika Sager; Douglas S Robinson
Journal:  Pediatr Allergy Immunol       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 6.377

3.  Safety and efficacy of tree pollen specific immunotherapy on the ultrarush administration schedule method using purethal trees.

Authors:  Andrzej Bozek; Krzysztof Kolodziejczyk; Jerzy Jarzab
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-03-24       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  House dust mite-specific immunotherapy with two licensed vaccines: Outcome under clinical routine conditions.

Authors:  Vera Mahler; Christian Klein; Angelika Sager; Jürgen Zimmermann
Journal:  Immun Inflamm Dis       Date:  2017-03-05

5.  Evaluation of safety and tolerability of a rush up-dosing allergen-specific immunotherapy with grass pollen, birch, hazel, and alder allergoid in children with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, with or without asthma.

Authors:  Giovanni Traina; Alberto Martelli; Salvatore Barberi; Amelia Licari; Gian Luigi Marseglia; Maria Angela Tosca; Giorgio Ciprandi
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2021-02-04

6.  Ultrarush schedule of subcutaneous immunotherapy with modified allergen extracts is safe in paediatric age.

Authors:  Mário Morais-Almeida; Cristina Arêde; Graça Sampaio; Luis Miguel Borrego
Journal:  Asia Pac Allergy       Date:  2016-01-27

7.  An accelerated dose escalation with a grass pollen allergoid is safe and well-tolerated: a randomized open label phase II trial.

Authors:  A M Chaker; B Al-Kadah; U Luther; U Neumann; M Wagenmann
Journal:  Clin Transl Allergy       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 5.871

Review 8.  Safety of engineered allergen-specific immunotherapy vaccines.

Authors:  Margarete Focke-Tejkl; Rudolf Valenta
Journal:  Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2012-10
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.