OBJECTIVE: Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a risk factor for asthma exacerbations and is associated with greater clinical severity. Discrepancies may exist between CRS clinical diagnosis and data from paranasal sinus (PS) X-ray or computed tomography (CT) scans. The objective was to compare PS involvement using low-dose CT and plain X-ray in allergic asthmatic patients with rhinitis. METHODS: Patients underwent PS radiography in the frontal and mentonian positions and low-dose CT consisting of six to eight coronal scans performed on the central region of the sphenoidal, ethmoidal, maxillary, and frontal sinuses. Possible results for each sinus were a normal aspect or the presence of mucosal thickening, opacification, and/or air-fluid level. RESULTS: Eighty-five (93.4%) of 91 study patients had radiological changes on radiography or CT. In only six (6.6%) were both tests normal. The maxillary was the most involved sinus by both methods. Simultaneous PS abnormalities were observed in 40.5% on X-ray and 56.7% on CT. For the frontal, ethmoidal, and sphenoidal sinuses, the proportion of normal results differed significantly between X-ray and CT: 80.2% versus 89%, 76.9% versus 63.7% and 96.7% versus 70.3%, respectively (p <.05). Agreement was over 70% for the maxillary and frontal sinuses. CT also provided a better diagnosis of air-fluid level changes than X-ray. CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose CT significantly showed larger number of normal PS results and diagnosed more severe PS lesions. As the determination of true sinus severity lesion impacts in asthma control, low-dose CT may replace PS plain X-ray and conventional CT to support better clinical decisions.
OBJECTIVE:Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a risk factor for asthma exacerbations and is associated with greater clinical severity. Discrepancies may exist between CRS clinical diagnosis and data from paranasal sinus (PS) X-ray or computed tomography (CT) scans. The objective was to compare PS involvement using low-dose CT and plain X-ray in allergic asthmaticpatients with rhinitis. METHODS:Patients underwent PS radiography in the frontal and mentonian positions and low-dose CT consisting of six to eight coronal scans performed on the central region of the sphenoidal, ethmoidal, maxillary, and frontal sinuses. Possible results for each sinus were a normal aspect or the presence of mucosal thickening, opacification, and/or air-fluid level. RESULTS: Eighty-five (93.4%) of 91 study patients had radiological changes on radiography or CT. In only six (6.6%) were both tests normal. The maxillary was the most involved sinus by both methods. Simultaneous PS abnormalities were observed in 40.5% on X-ray and 56.7% on CT. For the frontal, ethmoidal, and sphenoidal sinuses, the proportion of normal results differed significantly between X-ray and CT: 80.2% versus 89%, 76.9% versus 63.7% and 96.7% versus 70.3%, respectively (p <.05). Agreement was over 70% for the maxillary and frontal sinuses. CT also provided a better diagnosis of air-fluid level changes than X-ray. CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose CT significantly showed larger number of normal PS results and diagnosed more severe PS lesions. As the determination of true sinus severity lesion impacts in asthma control, low-dose CT may replace PS plain X-ray and conventional CT to support better clinical decisions.