Literature DB >> 20614655

Use of comparative effectiveness research in drug coverage and pricing decisions: a six-country comparison.

Corinna Sorenson1.   

Abstract

Comparative effectiveness research (CER) has assumed an increasing role in drug coverage and, in some cases, pricing decisions in Europe, as decision-makers seek to obtain better value for money. This issue brief comparatively examines the use of CER across six countries--Denmark, England, France, Germany, the Netherlands, and Sweden. With CER gaining traction in the United States, these international experiences offer insights and potential lessons. Investing in CER can help address the current gap in publicly available, credible, up-to-date, and scientifically based comparative information on the effectiveness of drugs and other health interventions. This information can be used to base coverage and pricing decisions on evidence of value, thereby facilitating access to and public and private investment in the most beneficial new drugs and technologies. In turn, use of CER creates incentives for more efficient, high-quality health care and encourages development of innovative products that offer measurable value to patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20614655

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Issue Brief (Commonw Fund)        ISSN: 1558-6847


  8 in total

1.  Role of centralized review processes for making reimbursement decisions on new health technologies in Europe.

Authors:  Tania Stafinski; Devidas Menon; Caroline Davis; Christopher McCabe
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2011-08-30

Review 2.  Market access of cancer drugs in European countries: improving resource allocation.

Authors:  Kim Pauwels; Isabelle Huys; Minne Casteels; Katelijne De Nys; Steven Simoens
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 4.493

3.  Avoiding and identifying errors and other threats to the credibility of health economic models.

Authors:  Paul Tappenden; James B Chilcott
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Measuring resource utilization in patient-oriented comparative effectiveness research: a psychometric study of the Resource Utilization Questionnaire.

Authors:  Arlene Smaldone; Argerie Tsimicalis; Patricia W Stone
Journal:  Res Theory Nurs Pract       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 0.745

5.  PAYER PERSPECTIVES ON FUTURE ACCEPTABILITY OF COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS AND RELATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH.

Authors:  Rachael Moloney; Penny Mohr; Emma Hawe; Koonal Shah; Martina Garau; Adrian Towse
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.188

Review 6.  Funding decisions for newborn screening: a comparative review of 22 decision processes in Europe.

Authors:  Katharina Elisabeth Fischer; Wolf Henning Rogowski
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 7.  Performance-Based Risk-Sharing Arrangements (PBRSA): Is it a Solution to Increase Bang for the Buck for Pharmaceutical Reimbursement Strategy for Our Nation and Around the World?

Authors:  Andy Eunwoo Kim; David Hohyun Choi; Jongwha Chang; Sean Hyungwoo Kim
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 2.859

8.  Decision-making in healthcare: a practical application of partial least square path modelling to coverage of newborn screening programmes.

Authors:  Katharina E Fischer
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 2.796

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.