Literature DB >> 20614402

[Contact allergy to metals and bone cement components in patients with intolerance of arthroplasty].

R Eben1, K-A Dietrich, C Nerz, S Schneider, A Schuh, I J Banke, F Mazoochian, P Thomas.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Complications in arthroplasty are mostly attributed to wear particle related loosening, infections or mechanical failure. There is no investigation in a large patient series giving data about the frequency of allergic reactions to metals or bone cement components in arthroplasty with complications.
METHODS: In 92 patients with cemented hip or knee arthroplasty (66 patients with complications, 26 without symptoms) patch testing and medical history were evaluated. Contact allergy rates to metals and potential bone cement components were analyzed as well as type of complaints and allergy history.
RESULTS: Main complaints were pain (81.8%), reduced range of motion (54.5%) and local swelling (56.1%). Contact allergy to nickel was shown in 16/66 patients (24.2%), 6.1% were allergic to cobalt and 3.0% to chromium. 21/66 patients (31.8%) showed an allergic reaction to bone cement components (gentamicin 23.8%, benzoyl peroxide 10.6%, hydroquinone 4.5%). Sensitization rates in patients without symptoms were 3.8% to nickel as well as to cobalt and chromium, and 15.4% to gentamicin.
CONCLUSION: Contact allergy rates to metals and potential bone cement components are higher in arthroplasty patients with complications than in the general population. Copyright (c) Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart--New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20614402     DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1262426

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dtsch Med Wochenschr        ISSN: 0012-0472            Impact factor:   0.628


  7 in total

Review 1.  Allergy in Total Knee Replacement. Does It Exist?: Review Article.

Authors:  Martin Faschingbauer; Lisa Renner; Friedrich Boettner
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2016-07-22

Review 2.  [Allergic reactions to bioimplants].

Authors:  L Klimek
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  No Clinical or Radiographic Differences Between Cemented Cobalt-Chromium and Titanium-Niobium Nitride Mobile-Bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Riccardo D'Ambrosi; Rafael Loucas; Marios Loucas; Riccardo Giorgino; Nicola Ursino; Giuseppe Maria Peretti
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2021-08-15       Impact factor: 1.033

4.  Allergic reactions in arthroplasty: myth or serious problem?

Authors:  Daniel Guenther; Peter Thomas; Daniel Kendoff; Mohamed Omar; Thorsten Gehrke; Carl Haasper
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 5.  Biomaterial hypersensitivity: is it real? Supportive evidence and approach considerations for metal allergic patients following total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Andrew J Mitchelson; Craig J Wilson; William M Mihalko; Thomas M Grupp; Blaine T Manning; Douglas A Dennis; Stuart B Goodman; Tony H Tzeng; Sonia Vasdev; Khaled J Saleh
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 6.  Implant allergy.

Authors:  P Thomas; B Summer
Journal:  Allergol Select       Date:  2017-08-04

7.  Skin Complications of Orthopedic Procedures and Devices.

Authors:  Zahra Azizian; Zeinab Hesami; Parvin Mansouri; Adel Ebrahimpour; Bahamin Attar; Reza Chalangari
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.429

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.