| Literature DB >> 20611050 |
Andreas Wittorf1, Ute E Jakobi, Kerstin K Bannert, Andreas Bechdolf, Bernhard W Müller, Gudrun Sartory, Michael Wagner, Georg Wiedemann, Wolfgang Wölwer, Jutta Herrlich, Gerhard Buchkremer, Stefan Klingberg.
Abstract
We examined whether the cognitive dispute of psychotic symptoms has a negative impact on the course of the therapeutic alliance. Sixty-seven patients with persistent psychotic symptoms received either cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) or supportive therapy. Questionnaire-based alliance ratings were repeatedly obtained throughout the course of therapy. Patient and therapist alliance ratings were examined separately. Data analyses comprised repeated measurement analyses of variance and cluster analytic procedures. Neither patient nor therapist alliance ratings showed a differential course throughout the treatments. This was despite the implementation of disputing strategies in later stages of CBT. Irrespective of the treatment condition a cluster with a positive alliance rating and a cluster with a poorer rating were found for therapist and patient ratings, respectively. Baseline symptoms and insight differentiated between the types of clusters. In conclusion, CBT-specific interventions that challenge psychotic symptoms do not necessarily negatively influence the course of the alliance.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20611050 DOI: 10.1097/NMD.0b013e3181e4f526
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Nerv Ment Dis ISSN: 0022-3018 Impact factor: 2.254