Literature DB >> 20610910

Indications and candidacy for active middle ear implants.

F Wagner, I Todt, J Wagner, A Ernst.   

Abstract

Currently, there are two active middle ear implants available commercially: the Vibrant Soundbridge system and the Carina system. A third active middle ear implant, the Esteem, is under clinical evaluation. All devices are indicated for patients with moderate-to-severe hearing loss. Because active middle ear implants are directly coupled to middle ear structures, many of the problems that patients with conventional hearing aids report, such as acoustic feedback, occlusion, and irritation of the outer ear canal, are avoided. In addition, AMEI patients perform well in background noise. However, indications for AMEIs are selective and candidates should be carefully evaluated before surgery. Before considering an AMEI, patients should be provided with conventional hearing aids. Only when benefit is insufficient and audiological selection criteria are met is further candidacy evaluation indicated. Since Colletti described coupling the Vibrant Soundbridge directly onto the round window membrane in 2006, the indications for the Vibrant Soundbridge have expanded and the VSB is implanted in patients with conductive and mixed hearing losses. Patients have often undergone middle ear surgery before. Especially mixed hearing loss cases with 30-60 dB HL sensorineural hearing impairment and 30-40 dB HL air-bone gaps may be helped by this new application. Copyright (c) 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20610910     DOI: 10.1159/000318518

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0065-3071


  6 in total

1.  Esteem® middle ear device versus conventional hearing aids for rehabilitation of bilateral sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  Simonetta Monini; Michela Biagini; Francesca Atturo; Maurizio Barbara
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-11-10       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Vibrant SoundBridge application to middle ear windows versus conventional hearing aids: a comparative study based on international outcome inventory for hearing aids.

Authors:  Ahmet Atas; Hakan Tutar; Bulent Gunduz; Yıldırım A Bayazıt
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Air- and Bone-Conducted Sources of Feedback With an Active Middle Ear Implant.

Authors:  Renee M Banakis Hartl; James R Easter; Mohamed A Alhussaini; Daniel J Tollin; Herman A Jenkins
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Long-Term Follow-Up of the Auditory Threshold After a Fully Implantable Middle Ear Implant.

Authors:  Simonetta Monini; Chiara Filippi; Gerardo Salerno; Maurizio Barbara
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 4.003

5.  Speech perception and hearing effort using a new active middle ear implant audio processor.

Authors:  Torsten Rahne; Laura Fröhlich; Luise Wagner; Miriam Hannah Kropp; Alexander Müller
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 3.236

6.  Battery Lifespan of an Implantable Middle Ear Device.

Authors:  Luca Bruschini; Francesca Forli; Giacomo Fiacchini; Rachele Canelli; Stefano Berrettini; Francesco Lazzerini
Journal:  Audiol Res       Date:  2022-09-07
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.