Literature DB >> 20610832

Do-not-resuscitate orders and predictive models after intracerebral hemorrhage.

D B Zahuranec1, L B Morgenstern, B N Sánchez, K Resnicow, D B White, J C Hemphill.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To quantify the accuracy of commonly used intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) predictive models in ICH patients with and without early do-not-resuscitate orders (DNR).
METHODS: Spontaneous ICH cases (n = 487) from the Brain Attack Surveillance in Corpus Christi study (2000-2003) and the University of California, San Francisco (June 2001-May 2004) were included. Three models (the ICH Score, the Cincinnati model, and the ICH grading scale [ICH-GS]) were compared to observed 30-day mortality with a chi(2) goodness-of-fit test first overall and then stratified by early DNR orders.
RESULTS: Median age was 71 years, 49% were female, median Glasgow Coma Scale score was 12, median ICH volume was 13 cm(3), and 35% had early DNR orders. Overall observed 30-day mortality was 42.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 38.3-47.1), with the average model-predicted 30-day mortality for the ICH Score, Cincinnati model, and ICH-GS at 39.9% (p = 0.005), 40.4% (p = 0.007), and 53.9% (p < 0.001). However, for patients with early DNR orders, the observed 30-day mortality was 83.5% (95% CI 78.0-89.1), with the models predicting mortality of 64.8% (p < 0.001), 57.2% (p < 0.001), and 77.8% (p = 0.02). For patients without early DNR orders, the observed 30-day mortality was 20.8% (95% CI 16.5-25.7), with the models predicting mortality of 26.6% (p = 0.05), 31.4% (p < 0.001), and 41.1% (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: ICH prognostic model performance is substantially impacted when stratifying by early DNR status, possibly giving a false sense of model accuracy when DNR status is not considered. Clinicians should be cautious when applying these predictive models to individual patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20610832      PMCID: PMC2931769          DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181ed9cc9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurology        ISSN: 0028-3878            Impact factor:   9.910


  28 in total

Review 1.  Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors.

Authors:  F E Harrell; K L Lee; D B Mark
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1996-02-28       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Increased risk of death in patients with do-not-resuscitate orders.

Authors:  L B Shepardson; S J Youngner; T Speroff; G E Rosenthal
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Use and misuse of the receiver operating characteristic curve in risk prediction.

Authors:  Nancy R Cook
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2007-02-20       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Predictors of early deterioration and mortality in black Americans with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage.

Authors:  A I Qureshi; K Safdar; J Weil; C Barch; D L Bliwise; A R Colohan; B Mackay; M R Frankel
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 7.914

5.  Excess stroke in Mexican Americans compared with non-Hispanic Whites: the Brain Attack Surveillance in Corpus Christi Project.

Authors:  Lewis B Morgenstern; Melinda A Smith; Lynda D Lisabeth; Jan M H Risser; Ken Uchino; Nelda Garcia; Paxton J Longwell; David A McFarling; Olubumi Akuwumi; Areej Al-Wabil; Fahmi Al-Senani; Devin L Brown; Lemuel A Moyé
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2004-08-15       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  Surrogate decision-makers' perspectives on discussing prognosis in the face of uncertainty.

Authors:  Leah R Evans; Elizabeth A Boyd; Grace Malvar; Latifat Apatira; John M Luce; Bernard Lo; Douglas B White
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2008-10-17       Impact factor: 21.405

7.  Validation and comparison of models predicting survival following intracerebral hemorrhage.

Authors:  S Tuhrim; D R Horowitz; M Sacher; J H Godbold
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 7.598

8.  Prospective validation of the ICH Score for 12-month functional outcome.

Authors:  J Claude Hemphill; Mary Farrant; Terry A Neill
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 9.910

9.  Use of the original, modified, or new intracerebral hemorrhage score to predict mortality and morbidity after intracerebral hemorrhage.

Authors:  Raymond Tak Fai Cheung; Liang-Yu Zou
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2003-06-12       Impact factor: 7.914

10.  Predicting recovery after intracerebral hemorrhage--an external validation in patients from controlled clinical trials.

Authors:  Christian Weimar; Andreas Ziegler; Ralph L Sacco; Hans C Diener; Inke R König
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 4.849

View more
  36 in total

Review 1.  Intracranial hemorrhage.

Authors:  Andrew M Naidech
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 21.405

Review 2.  Steps to consider in the approach and management of critically ill patient with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage.

Authors:  Daniel Agustin Godoy; Gustavo Rene Piñero; Patricia Koller; Luca Masotti; Mario Di Napoli
Journal:  World J Crit Care Med       Date:  2015-08-04

3.  Variability in physician prognosis and recommendations after intracerebral hemorrhage.

Authors:  Darin B Zahuranec; Angela Fagerlin; Brisa N Sánchez; Meghan E Roney; Bradford B Thompson; Andrea Fuhrel-Forbis; Lewis B Morgenstern
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 9.910

4.  Time Trends in Race-Ethnic Differences in Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders After Stroke.

Authors:  Kunal Bailoor; Fatema Shafie-Khorassani; Rebecca J Lank; Erin Case; Nelda M Garcia; Lynda D Lisabeth; Brisa N Sánchez; Sehee Kim; Lewis B Morgenstern; Darin B Zahuranec
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 7.914

5.  Hyperglycemia and outcome in intracerebral hemorrhage: from bedside to bench-more study is needed.

Authors:  Wuwei Feng; Shunaiber Tauhid; Sweta Goel; Evgeny V Sidorov; Magdy Selim
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 6.829

6.  Pediatric intracerebral hemorrhage score: a simple grading scale for intracerebral hemorrhage in children.

Authors:  Lauren A Beslow; Rebecca N Ichord; Melissa C Gindville; Jonathan T Kleinman; Kyle Engelmann; Rachel A Bastian; Daniel J Licht; Sabrina E Smith; Argye E Hillis; Lori C Jordan
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 7.914

7.  Variation in do-not-resuscitate orders for patients with ischemic stroke: implications for national hospital comparisons.

Authors:  Adam G Kelly; Darin B Zahuranec; Robert G Holloway; Lewis B Morgenstern; James F Burke
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 7.914

8.  Factors associated with the withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies in patients with severe traumatic brain injury: a multicenter cohort study.

Authors:  Nicolas Côte; Alexis F Turgeon; François Lauzier; Lynne Moore; Damon C Scales; Francis Bernard; Ryan Zarychanski; Karen E A Burns; Maureen O Meade; David Zygun; Jean-François Simard; Amélie Boutin; Jacques G Brochu; Dean A Fergusson
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.210

9.  Withdrawal of Life-Sustaining Treatments in Perceived Devastating Brain Injury: The Key Role of Uncertainty.

Authors:  Christos Lazaridis
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 3.210

10.  Estimating and communicating prognosis in advanced neurologic disease.

Authors:  Robert G Holloway; Robert Gramling; Adam G Kelly
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 9.910

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.