Literature DB >> 20610756

Low-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation over left dorsal premotor cortex improves the dynamic control of visuospatially cued actions.

Nick S Ward1, Sven Bestmann, Gesa Hartwigsen, Michael M Weiss, Lars O D Christensen, Richard S J Frackowiak, John C Rothwell, Hartwig R Siebner.   

Abstract

Left rostral dorsal premotor cortex (rPMd) and supramarginal gyrus (SMG) have been implicated in the dynamic control of actions. In 12 right-handed healthy individuals, we applied 30 min of low-frequency (1 Hz) repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) over left rPMd to investigate the involvement of left rPMd and SMG in the rapid adjustment of actions guided by visuospatial cues. After rTMS, subjects underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging while making spatially congruent button presses with the right or left index finger in response to a left- or right-sided target. Subjects were asked to covertly prepare motor responses as indicated by a directional cue presented 1 s before the target. On 20% of trials, the cue was invalid, requiring subjects to readjust their motor plan according to the target location. Compared with sham rTMS, real rTMS increased the number of correct responses in invalidly cued trials. After real rTMS, task-related activity of the stimulated left rPMd showed increased task-related coupling with activity in ipsilateral SMG and the adjacent anterior intraparietal area (AIP). Individuals who showed a stronger increase in left-hemispheric premotor-parietal connectivity also made fewer errors on invalidly cued trials after rTMS. The results suggest that rTMS over left rPMd improved the ability to dynamically adjust visuospatial response mapping by strengthening left-hemispheric connectivity between rPMd and the SMG-AIP region. These results support the notion that left rPMd and SMG-AIP contribute toward dynamic control of actions and demonstrate that low-frequency rTMS can enhance functional coupling between task-relevant brain regions and improve some aspects of motor performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20610756      PMCID: PMC3717513          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4499-09.2010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  37 in total

Review 1.  Imaging the premotor areas.

Authors:  N Picard; P L Strick
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 6.627

Review 2.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain.

Authors:  Maurizio Corbetta; Gordon L Shulman
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 34.870

3.  Effects on the right motor hand-area excitability produced by low-frequency rTMS over human contralateral homologous cortex.

Authors:  Francesca Gilio; Vincenzo Rizzo; Hartwig R Siebner; John C Rothwell
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2003-06-23       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Implementation of visuospatial cues in response selection.

Authors:  Thilo van Eimeren; Thomas Wolbers; Alexander Münchau; Christian Büchel; Cornelius Weiller; Hartwig Roman Siebner
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-08-08       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Cerebral changes during performance of overlearned arbitrary visuomotor associations.

Authors:  Meike J Grol; Floris P de Lange; Frans A J Verstraten; Richard E Passingham; Ivan Toni
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-01-04       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Premotor cortex modulates somatosensory cortex during voluntary movements without proprioceptive feedback.

Authors:  Mark Schram Christensen; Jesper Lundbye-Jensen; Svend Sparre Geertsen; Tue Hvass Petersen; Olaf B Paulson; Jens Bo Nielsen
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2007-03-18       Impact factor: 24.884

7.  Dissociating arbitrary stimulus-response mapping from movement planning during preparatory period: evidence from event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Cristiana Cavina-Pratesi; Kenneth F Valyear; Jody C Culham; Stefan Köhler; Sukhvinder S Obhi; Carlo Alberto Marzi; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-03-08       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Bimodal (auditory and visual) left frontoparietal circuitry for sensorimotor integration and sensorimotor learning.

Authors:  M Iacoboni; R P Woods; J C Mazziotta
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 13.501

9.  Analysis of fMRI time-series revisited--again.

Authors:  K J Worsley; K J Friston
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Functionally specific reorganization in human premotor cortex.

Authors:  Jacinta O'Shea; Heidi Johansen-Berg; Danielle Trief; Silke Göbel; Matthew F S Rushworth
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2007-05-03       Impact factor: 17.173

View more
  20 in total

1.  Rapid functional reorganization in human cortex following neural perturbation.

Authors:  Theodore P Zanto; James Z Chadick; Gabriela Satris; Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Causal role of prefrontal cortex in strengthening of episodic memories through reconsolidation.

Authors:  Marco Sandrini; Nitzan Censor; Jonathan Mishoe; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Coordination of uncoupled bimanual movements by strictly timed interhemispheric connectivity.

Authors:  Gianpiero Liuzzi; Vanessa Hörniss; Maximo Zimerman; Christian Gerloff; Friedhelm C Hummel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Shifts in connectivity during procedural learning after motor cortex stimulation: A combined transcranial magnetic stimulation/functional magnetic resonance imaging study.

Authors:  Adam Steel; Sunbin Song; Devin Bageac; Kristine M Knutson; Aysha Keisler; Ziad S Saad; Stephen J Gotts; Eric M Wassermann; Leonora Wilkinson
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 4.027

5.  Left dorsal premotor cortex and supramarginal gyrus complement each other during rapid action reprogramming.

Authors:  Gesa Hartwigsen; Sven Bestmann; Nick S Ward; Saskia Woerbel; Claudia Mastroeni; Oliver Granert; Hartwig R Siebner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Task-Dependent Functional and Effective Connectivity during Conceptual Processing.

Authors:  Philipp Kuhnke; Markus Kiefer; Gesa Hartwigsen
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Online Movement Correction in Response to the Unexpectedly Perturbed Initial or Final Action Goals: An ERP and sLORETA Study.

Authors:  Lin Yu; Thomas Schack; Dirk Koester
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-05-15

8.  Deficit in complex sequence processing after a virtual lesion of left BA45.

Authors:  Emeline Clerget; Michael Andres; Etienne Olivier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Safety and recommendations for TMS use in healthy subjects and patient populations, with updates on training, ethical and regulatory issues: Expert Guidelines.

Authors:  Simone Rossi; Andrea Antal; Sven Bestmann; Marom Bikson; Carmen Brewer; Jürgen Brockmöller; Linda L Carpenter; Massimo Cincotta; Robert Chen; Jeff D Daskalakis; Vincenzo Di Lazzaro; Michael D Fox; Mark S George; Donald Gilbert; Vasilios K Kimiskidis; Giacomo Koch; Risto J Ilmoniemi; Jean Pascal Lefaucheur; Letizia Leocani; Sarah H Lisanby; Carlo Miniussi; Frank Padberg; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Walter Paulus; Angel V Peterchev; Angelo Quartarone; Alexander Rotenberg; John Rothwell; Paolo M Rossini; Emiliano Santarnecchi; Mouhsin M Shafi; Hartwig R Siebner; Yoshikatzu Ugawa; Eric M Wassermann; Abraham Zangen; Ulf Ziemann; Mark Hallett
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-10-24       Impact factor: 4.861

Review 10.  Combined neurostimulation and neuroimaging in cognitive neuroscience: past, present, and future.

Authors:  Sven Bestmann; Eva Feredoes
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 5.691

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.