Literature DB >> 20610556

Genomic alterations and allelic imbalances are strong prognostic predictors in osteosarcoma.

Jan Smida1, Daniel Baumhoer, Michael Rosemann, Axel Walch, Stefan Bielack, Christopher Poremba, Klaus Remberger, Eberhard Korsching, Wolfram Scheurlen, Christian Dierkes, Stefan Burdach, Gernot Jundt, Michael J Atkinson, Michaela Nathrath.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Osteosarcoma, the most common primary malignant tumor of the bone, is characterized by complex karyotypes with numerous structural and numerical alterations. Despite attempts to establish molecular prognostic markers at the time of diagnosis, the most accepted predictive factor remains the histologic evaluation of necrosis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The present approach was carried out to search for genome-wide recurrent loss of heterozygosity and copy number variations that could have prognostic and therapeutic impact for osteosarcoma patients. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Pretherapeutic biopsy samples of 45 osteosarcoma patients were analyzed using Affymetrix 10K2 high-density single nucleotide polymorphism arrays. Numerical aberrations and allelic imbalances were correlated with the histologically assessed response to therapy and clinical follow-up.
RESULTS: The most frequent genomic alterations included amplifications of chromosome 6p21 (15.6%), 8q24 (15.6%, harboring MYC), and 12q14 (11.1%, harboring CDK4), as well as loss of heterozygosity of 10q21.1 (44.4%). All these aberrations and the total degree of heterozygosity of each tumor were significantly associated with an adverse outcome of patients and were used to define a chromosomal alteration staging system with a superior predictive potential compared with the histologic regression grading.
CONCLUSIONS: Structural chromosomal alterations detected by single nucleotide polymorphism analysis provide a simple but robust parameter to anticipate response to chemotherapy. The proposed chromosomal alteration staging system might therefore help to better predict the clinical course of osteosarcoma patients at the time of initial diagnosis and to adapt neoadjuvant treatment in patients resistant to the current protocols.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20610556     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-0284

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  45 in total

1.  Detection of Somatic Structural Variants Enables Quantification and Characterization of Circulating Tumor DNA in Children With Solid Tumors.

Authors:  Kelly Klega; Alma Imamovic-Tuco; Gavin Ha; Andrea N Clapp; Stephanie Meyer; Abigail Ward; Catherine Clinton; Anwesha Nag; Eliezer Van Allen; Elizabeth Mullen; Steven G DuBois; Katherine Janeway; Matthew Meyerson; Aaron R Thorner; Brian D Crompton
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2018-07-05

Review 2.  The pharmacogenomics of osteosarcoma.

Authors:  M Serra; C M Hattinger
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 3.550

Review 3.  Epigenetic alterations in osteosarcoma: promising targets.

Authors:  Binghao Li; Zhaoming Ye
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 2.316

Review 4.  Understanding tumor heterogeneity as functional compartments--superorganisms revisited.

Authors:  Thomas G P Grunewald; Saskia M Herbst; Jürgen Heinze; Stefan Burdach
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 5.531

5.  CD8+/FOXP3+-ratio in osteosarcoma microenvironment separates survivors from non-survivors: a multicenter validated retrospective study.

Authors:  Benedikt Fritzsching; Joerg Fellenberg; Linda Moskovszky; Zoltan Sápi; Tibor Krenacs; Isidro Machado; Johannes Poeschl; Burkhard Lehner; Miklos Szendrõi; Antonio Llombart Bosch; Ludger Bernd; Monika Csóka; Gunhild Mechtersheimer; Volker Ewerbeck; Ralf Kinscherf; Pierre Kunz
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 8.110

6.  p53 mediated apoptosis in osteosarcoma MG-63 cells by inhibition of FANCD2 gene expression.

Authors:  Peng Xia; Yifu Sun; Changjun Zheng; Tingting Hou; Mingyang Kang; Xiaoyu Yang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-07-15

Review 7.  Advances in the Treatment of Pediatric Bone Sarcomas.

Authors:  Patrick J Grohar; Katherine A Janeway; Luke D Mase; Joshua D Schiffman
Journal:  Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book       Date:  2017

8.  A novel prognostic model for osteosarcoma using circulating CXCL10 and FLT3LG.

Authors:  Ricardo J Flores; Aaron J Kelly; Yiting Li; Manjula Nakka; Donald A Barkauskas; Mark Krailo; Lisa L Wang; Laszlo Perlaky; Ching C Lau; M John Hicks; Tsz-Kwong Man
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 9.  Canine sarcomas as a surrogate for the human disease.

Authors:  Daniel L Gustafson; Dawn L Duval; Daniel P Regan; Douglas H Thamm
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 12.310

Review 10.  [Molecular characterization of osteosarcomas].

Authors:  D Baumhoer
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.011

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.