Literature DB >> 20610466

High adherence and concordance within a clinical trial of antihypertensives.

Robert Horne1, Jane Clatworthy, Matthew Hankins.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To explore hypertensive patients' beliefs about their condition and its treatment and their adherence within the context of a clinical trial. To assess the degree of concordance between patients' beliefs about hypertension and the medical model of the condition.
METHODS: This was a questionnaire-based study, involving 230 patients participating in the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial (ASCOT), a randomized controlled trial comparing two pharmaceutical approaches to the management of hypertension. A comparison group of 106 hypertensive patients who were screened for ASCOT but did not meet the entry criteria was also recruited. Outcome measures were beliefs about hypertension and antihypertensive medication, and adherence to medication (self-report and tablet count).
RESULTS: Adherence to medication was higher than anticipated, with 45% participants reporting complete adherence over the 18-month study and a further 40% only rare non-adherence. Patients' beliefs about their condition and treatment were generally concordant with the medical model of hypertension. High concordance was associated with high medication adherence (p<0.001). DISCUSSION: Clinical trial volunteers may have beliefs that are unusually concordant with the medical model of hypertension and may demonstrate atypically high adherence. This has implications for the transferability of trial findings to the general hypertensive population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20610466     DOI: 10.1177/1742395310369018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chronic Illn        ISSN: 1742-3953


  14 in total

1.  Disease-specific perception of fracture risk and incident fracture rates: GLOW cohort study.

Authors:  C L Gregson; E M Dennison; J E Compston; S Adami; J D Adachi; F A Anderson; S Boonen; R Chapurlat; A Díez-Pérez; S L Greenspan; F H Hooven; A Z LaCroix; J W Nieves; J C Netelenbos; J Pfeilschifter; M Rossini; C Roux; K G Saag; S Silverman; E S Siris; N B Watts; A Wyman; C Cooper
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Choose (and use) your tools wisely: "Validated" measures and advanced analyses can provide invalid evidence for/against a theory.

Authors:  L Alison Phillips; Howard Leventhal; Edith A Burns
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2016-10-18

3.  Health Beliefs and Medication Adherence in Omanis With Hypertension.

Authors:  Huda Al-Noumani; Jia-Rong Wu; Debra Barksdale; George Knafl; Esra AlKhasawneh; Gwen Sherwood
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Nurs       Date:  2018 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 2.083

4.  Inhaled corticosteroid beliefs, complementary and alternative medicine, and uncontrolled asthma in urban minority adults.

Authors:  Maureen George; Maxim Topaz; Cynthia Rand; Marilyn Lynn Sawyer Sommers; Karen Glanz; Michael V Pantalon; Jun J Mao; Judy A Shea
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 10.793

Review 5.  Men's beliefs about treatment for erectile dysfunction-what influences treatment use? A systematic review.

Authors:  Paul Williams; Hayley McBain; Aliya Amirova; Stanton Newman; Kathleen Mulligan
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2020-03-31       Impact factor: 2.896

Review 6.  A systematic review of patient self-reported barriers of adherence to antihypertensive medications using the world health organization multidimensional adherence model.

Authors:  Suliman A AlGhurair; Christine A Hughes; Scot H Simpson; Lisa M Guirguis
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 3.738

7.  Diagnosing medication non-adherence in a patient with myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Siqin Ye; David J Krupka; Karina W Davidson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-08-03

Review 8.  Understanding patients' adherence-related beliefs about medicines prescribed for long-term conditions: a meta-analytic review of the Necessity-Concerns Framework.

Authors:  Rob Horne; Sarah C E Chapman; Rhian Parham; Nick Freemantle; Alastair Forbes; Vanessa Cooper
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Developing an interactive mobile phone self-report system for self-management of hypertension. Part 1: patient and professional perspectives.

Authors:  Ulrika Bengtsson; Dick Kasperowski; Lena Ring; Karin Kjellgren
Journal:  Blood Press       Date:  2014-02-24       Impact factor: 2.835

10.  Translation and psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Leeds Attitudes to Concordance II scale.

Authors:  Wei He; Ann Bonner; Debra Anderson
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2015-08-01       Impact factor: 2.796

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.