Literature DB >> 20609639

Three-year outcome of sirolimus-eluting versus bare-metal stents for the treatment of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (from the MISSION! Intervention Study).

Jael Z Atary1, Bas L van der Hoeven, Su San Liem, J Wouter Jukema, Johanna G van der Bom, Douwe E Atsma, Marianne Bootsma, Katja Zeppenfeld, Ernst E van der Wall, Martin J Schalij.   

Abstract

To compare the long-term efficacy and safety of sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) to those of bare-metal stents (BMS) for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, outcomes were assessed in 310 patients (mean age age 59 +/- 11 years, 78% men) included in the randomized MISSION! Intervention Study: A Prospective Randomised Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of Drug-Eluting Stents Versus Bare-Metal Stents for the Treatment of Acute Myocardial Infarction after a median follow-up period of 38 months. All patients were treated with aspirin (lifelong) and clopidogrel for 1 year after stent implantation. Except for a significant difference between reference vessel diameters (SES 2.76 mm vs BMS 2.92 mm, p = 0.02), there were no significant differences in baseline and angiographic characteristics between the treatment groups (158 SES, 152 BMS). A significant difference between SES and BMS patients for all revascularization end points was found after the first year of follow-up. However, at 3 years of follow-up, although there was still a trend toward better clinical outcomes in SES-treated patients, differences were no longer significant (death 4.4% vs 6.6%, p = 0.41; target vessel-related myocardial infarction 2.5% vs 4.6%, p = 0.32; target vessel revascularization 8.9% vs 15.8%, p = 0.06), target lesion revascularization 6.3% vs 12.5%, p = 0.06; and target vessel failure 12.0% vs 19.7%, p = 0.06). Three cases of very late (definite) stent thrombosis were observed in the SES group (1.9%) versus none in the BMS group (p = 0.14). In conclusion, the significant SES benefit (compared to BMS) in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctions at 1-year follow-up in terms of target vessel revascularizations decreased to some extent because of more similar target vessel revascularization rates during the 2 subsequent years. Rates of death and nonfatal recurrent MI remained comparable. Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20609639     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.02.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  11 in total

1.  First human trial of KW39 slotted-tube stents: for percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Minoru Tanaka; Nelson Hirokazu Tsuno; Kazuaki Mitsudo; Kazushige Kadota; Ryozo Tatami; Masayuki Kato; Kenichi Kato; Akihiko Nogami; Osamu Ishikawa; Koki Takahashi
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2011

2.  Drug-eluting stents in patients with anterior STEMI undergoing primary angioplasty: a substudy of the DESERT cooperation.

Authors:  Giuseppe De Luca; Maurits T Dirksen; Christian Spaulding; Henning Kelbæk; Martin Schalij; Leif Thuesen; Bas van der Hoeven; Marteen A Vink; Christoph Kaiser; Carmine Musto; Tania Chechi; Gaia Spaziani; Luis Salvador Diaz de la Llera; Vincenzo Pasceri; Emilio Di Lorenzo; Roberto Violini; Harry Suryapranata; Gregg W Stone
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 3.  Drug-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents for acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Joshua Feinberg; Emil Eik Nielsen; Janette Greenhalgh; Juliet Hounsome; Naqash J Sethi; Sanam Safi; Christian Gluud; Janus C Jakobsen
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-08-23

4.  Drug-eluting stents versus bare metal stents in ST elevation myocardial infarction at a follow-up of three years or longer: A meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Authors:  Ankur Sethi; Amol Bahekar; Rohit Bhuriya; Anurag Bajaj; Daniela Kovacs; Aziz Ahmed; Sandeep Khosla
Journal:  Exp Clin Cardiol       Date:  2012

5.  Drug-Eluting Stents versus Bare-Metal Stents in Taiwanese Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome: An Outcome Report of a Multicenter Registry.

Authors:  Chi-Cheng Lai; Hon-Kan Yip; Tsung-Hsien Lin; Chiung-Jen Wu; Wen-Ter Lai; Chun-Peng Liu; Shu-Chen Chang; Guang-Yuan Mar
Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 2.672

Review 6.  Long-term clinical outcomes following sirolimus-eluting stent implantation in patients with acute myocardial infarction. A meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Authors:  Raffaele Piccolo; Salvatore Cassese; Gennaro Galasso; Tullio Niglio; Roberta De Rosa; Chiara De Biase; Federico Piscione
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 7.  Risk stratification for ST segment elevation myocardial infarction in the era of primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Richard A Brogan; Christopher J Malkin; Phillip D Batin; Alexander D Simms; James M McLenachan; Christopher P Gale
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2014-08-26

8.  Efficacy and safety of a biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent in primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Qiang Li; Zichuan Tong; Lefeng Wang; Jianjun Zhang; Yonggui Ge; Hongshi Wang; Weiming Li; Li Xu; Zhuhua Ni; Xinchun Yang
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2013-12-26       Impact factor: 3.318

9.  Drug-eluting coronary stents - focus on improved patient outcomes.

Authors:  Zehra Jaffery; Amit Prasad; John H Lee; Christopher J White
Journal:  Patient Relat Outcome Meas       Date:  2011-09-22

10.  Chinese Herbal Medicines Might Improve the Long-Term Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Results of a Decision-Analytic Markov Model.

Authors:  Shao-Li Wang; Cheng-Long Wang; Pei-Li Wang; Hao Xu; Ke-Ji Chen; Da-Zhuo Shi
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 2.629

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.