BACKGROUND: In euthymic bipolar disorder patients, scores on the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) are not abnormal but general functioning remains impaired. Recent studies provide ample evidence that euthymic patients show significant impairment on more comprehensive neuropsychological test batteries. There is no definitive relationship between performance on neuropsychological test batteries and the ability to cope in everyday life. Ecologically valid tests of cognitive function aim to bridge this gap as they use everyday tasks to explore cognitive function. The aims of the study were to examine if euthymic bipolar disorder patients were impaired on ecologically valid tests of cognitive function and measures of general, social and occupational function. We examined the relationships between cognitive impairment and residual symptoms, clinical history, general functioning and employment. METHOD: Cognitive tasks, functional assessments and mood scales were administered to 29 euthymic bipolar disorder patients and 29 matched controls. RESULTS: Patients were impaired on ecologically valid tests of attention, memory and executive function. Patients showed impairment in general, social and occupational functioning. Unemployment was associated with impairment in attention. Memory impairment correlated with number of previous manic episodes. LIMITATIONS: All patients were on psychotropic medication, which may affect cognition. Traditional neuropsychological tests were not performed concurrently with ecologically valid tests. CONCLUSIONS: Ecologically valid tests of cognitive function are sensitive in detecting cognitive impairment in euthymic bipolar disorder. Clinicians should consider using these tests in the recovery phase of bipolar illness, as they may be particularly helpful in showing where rehabilitation should focus. 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND: In euthymic bipolar disorderpatients, scores on the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) are not abnormal but general functioning remains impaired. Recent studies provide ample evidence that euthymic patients show significant impairment on more comprehensive neuropsychological test batteries. There is no definitive relationship between performance on neuropsychological test batteries and the ability to cope in everyday life. Ecologically valid tests of cognitive function aim to bridge this gap as they use everyday tasks to explore cognitive function. The aims of the study were to examine if euthymic bipolar disorderpatients were impaired on ecologically valid tests of cognitive function and measures of general, social and occupational function. We examined the relationships between cognitive impairment and residual symptoms, clinical history, general functioning and employment. METHOD: Cognitive tasks, functional assessments and mood scales were administered to 29 euthymic bipolar disorderpatients and 29 matched controls. RESULTS:Patients were impaired on ecologically valid tests of attention, memory and executive function. Patients showed impairment in general, social and occupational functioning. Unemployment was associated with impairment in attention. Memory impairment correlated with number of previous manic episodes. LIMITATIONS: All patients were on psychotropic medication, which may affect cognition. Traditional neuropsychological tests were not performed concurrently with ecologically valid tests. CONCLUSIONS: Ecologically valid tests of cognitive function are sensitive in detecting cognitive impairment in euthymic bipolar disorder. Clinicians should consider using these tests in the recovery phase of bipolar illness, as they may be particularly helpful in showing where rehabilitation should focus. 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Authors: C M Bonnín; C Torrent; J M Goikolea; M Reinares; B Solé; M Valentí; J Sánchez-Moreno; D Hidalgo; R Tabarés-Seisdedos; A Martínez-Arán; E Vieta Journal: Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci Date: 2013-08-03 Impact factor: 5.270
Authors: Timea Sparding; Katja Silander; Erik Pålsson; Josefin Östlind; Carl Sellgren; Carl Johan Ekman; Erik Joas; Stefan Hansen; Mikael Landén Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-01-23 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Juul Koene; Susan Zyto; Jaap van der Stel; Natasja van Lang; Marion Ammeraal; Ralph W Kupka; Jaap van Weeghel Journal: Int J Bipolar Disord Date: 2022-03-14
Authors: Michela Lupo; Giusy Olivito; Andrea Gragnani; Marco Saettoni; Libera Siciliano; Corinna Pancheri; Matteo Panfili; Marco Bozzali; Roberto Delle Chiaie; Maria Leggio Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2021-03-29 Impact factor: 5.923