Literature DB >> 20609470

A comparison of osteoclast resorption pits on bone with titanium and zirconia surfaces.

Thomas Hefti1, Martina Frischherz, Nicholas D Spencer, Heike Hall, Falko Schlottig.   

Abstract

Osteoclasts resorb bone at surfaces, leaving behind pits and trails where both mineral and organic phases of bone have been dissolved. Rough surface structures are deliberately imparted to synthetic implants, in order to improve osseointegration. The aim of this study is to characterize osteoclastic resorption pits on native bone surfaces and to compare these with state-of-the-art titanium and zirconia implant surfaces. The size (i.e. length, width and depth) of resorption pits was compared to the size of surface features of sandblasted and etched titanium and zirconia surfaces. It was found that resorption pits from native bone and surface features of the sandblasted and etched titanium and zirconia surfaces were quite similar in their dimensions. Most structures showed a length between 5 and 40 mum, a width between 2 and 20 mum and a depth between 1 and 8 mum. Additionally, the wavelength-dependent surface roughness was measured, revealing an S(a) value of 60 nm in the resorption pits, 86 nm on zirconia and between 127 and 140 nm on titanium surfaces. The results of this study may provide some insight into structural requirements for the bone-remodeling cycle and help to improve the design of new implant surfaces for osseointegration applications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20609470     DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.06.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomaterials        ISSN: 0142-9612            Impact factor:   12.479


  12 in total

Review 1.  Reconsidering Osteoconduction in the Era of Additive Manufacturing.

Authors:  Franz E Weber
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 6.389

Review 2.  Podosome organization drives osteoclast-mediated bone resorption.

Authors:  Dan Georgess; Irma Machuca-Gayet; Anne Blangy; Pierre Jurdic
Journal:  Cell Adh Migr       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 3.  Novel insights into the coupling of osteoclasts and resorption to bone formation.

Authors:  Margaret M Durdan; Ruth D Azaria; Megan M Weivoda
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2021-10-30       Impact factor: 7.727

4.  Platelet-rich plasma alone is unable to trigger contact osteogenesis on titanium implant surfaces.

Authors:  Ung-Gyu Kim; Jung-You Choi; Jun-Beom Lee; In-Sung Luke Yeo
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2022-06-06

5.  Varanoid Tooth Eruption and Implantation Modes in a Late Cretaceous Mosasaur.

Authors:  Min Liu; David A Reed; Giancarlo M Cecchini; Xuanyu Lu; Karan Ganjawalla; Carol S Gonzales; Richard Monahan; Xianghong Luan; Thomas G H Diekwisch
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 4.566

6.  Study of Osteoclast Adhesion to Cortical Bone Surfaces: A Correlative Microscopy Approach for Concomitant Imaging of Cellular Dynamics and Surface Modifications.

Authors:  Michal Shemesh; Sefi Addadi; Yonat Milstein; Benjamin Geiger; Lia Addadi
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 9.229

Review 7.  Modulation of Osteoclast Interactions with Orthopaedic Biomaterials.

Authors:  Chris Steffi; Zhilong Shi; Chee Hoe Kong; Wilson Wang
Journal:  J Funct Biomater       Date:  2018-02-26

8.  Osteoclastogenesis Behavior of Zirconia for Dental Implant.

Authors:  Boldbayar Ganbold; Seong-Kyun Kim; Seong-Joo Heo; Jai-Young Koak; Zang Hee Lee; Jaejin Cho
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 3.623

9.  Osteoclasts on bone and dentin in vitro: mechanism of trail formation and comparison of resorption behavior.

Authors:  M Rumpler; T Würger; P Roschger; E Zwettler; I Sturmlechner; P Altmann; P Fratzl; M J Rogers; K Klaushofer
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.333

10.  Combinatorial Surface Roughness Effects on Osteoclastogenesis and Osteogenesis.

Authors:  Yang Zhang; S Elisa Chen; Jinlong Shao; Jeroen J J P van den Beucken
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 9.229

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.