Literature DB >> 20609392

Creating a global rare disease patient registry linked to a rare diseases biorepository database: Rare Disease-HUB (RD-HUB).

Yaffa R Rubinstein1, Stephen C Groft, Ronald Bartek, Kyle Brown, Ronald A Christensen, Elaine Collier, Amy Farber, Jennifer Farmer, John H Ferguson, Christopher B Forrest, Nicole C Lockhart, Kate R McCurdy, Helen Moore, Geraldine B Pollen, Rachel Richesson, Vanessa Rangel Miller, Sara Hull, Jim Vaught.   

Abstract

A movement to create a global patient registry for as many as 7,000 rare diseases was launched at a workshop, "Advancing Rare Disease Research: The Intersection of Patient Registries, Biospecimen Repositories, and Clinical Data." http://rarediseases.info.nih.gov/PATIENT_REGISTRIES_WORKSHOP/. The workshop was sponsored by the Office of Rare Diseases Research (ORDR). The focus was the building of an infrastructure for an internet-based global registry linking to biorepositories. Such a registry would serve the patients, investigators, and drug companies. To aid researchers the participants suggested the creation of a centralized database of biorepositories for rare biospecimens (RD-HUB)http://biospecimens.ordr.info.nih.gov/ that could be linked to the registry. Over two days of presentations and breakout sessions, several hundred attendees discussed government rules and regulations concerning privacy and patients' rights and the nature and scope of data to be entered into a central registry as well as concerns about how to validate patient and clinician-entered data to ensure data accuracy. Mechanisms for aggregating data from existing registries were also discussed. The attendees identified registry best practices, model coding systems, international systems for recruiting patients into clinical trials and novel ways of using the internet directly to invite participation in research. They also speculated about who would bear ultimate responsibility for the informatics in the registry and who would have access to the information. Hurdles associated with biospecimen collection and how to overcome them were detailed. The development of the recommendations was, in itself, an indication of the commitment of the rare disease community as never before. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20609392      PMCID: PMC2930109          DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2010.06.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials        ISSN: 1551-7144            Impact factor:   2.226


  35 in total

1.  Mutation (variation) databases and registries: a rationale for coordination of efforts.

Authors:  Arleen D Auerbach; John Burn; Jean-Jacques Cassiman; Mireille Claustres; Richard G H Cotton; Garry Cutting; Johan T den Dunnen; Mona El-Ruby; Aida Falcon Vargas; Marc S Greenblatt; Finlay Macrae; Yoichi Matsubara; David L Rimoin; Mauno Vihinen; Christine Van Broeckhoven
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 53.242

2.  Down syndrome: national conference on patient registries, research databases, and biobanks.

Authors:  Mary Lou Oster-Granite; Melissa A Parisi; Leonard Abbeduto; Dorit S Berlin; Cathy Bodine; Dana Bynum; George Capone; Elaine Collier; Dan Hall; Lisa Kaeser; Petra Kaufmann; Jeffrey Krischer; Michelle Livingston; Linda L McCabe; Jill Pace; Karl Pfenninger; Sonja A Rasmussen; Roger H Reeves; Yaffa Rubinstein; Stephanie Sherman; Sharon F Terry; Michelle Sie Whitten; Stephen Williams; Edward R B McCabe; Yvonne T Maddox
Journal:  Mol Genet Metab       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 4.797

3.  Diagnostic odyssey of patients with myotonic dystrophy.

Authors:  James E Hilbert; Tetsuo Ashizawa; John W Day; Elizabeth A Luebbe; William B Martens; Michael P McDermott; Rabi Tawil; Charles A Thornton; Richard T Moxley
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 4.849

4.  Disease registries on the nationwide health information network.

Authors:  Daniel Russler
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2011-05-01

Review 5.  National information system for rare diseases with an approach to data architecture: A systematic review.

Authors:  Simin Derayeh; Alireza Kazemi; Reza Rabiei; Azamossadat Hosseini; Hamid Moghaddasi
Journal:  Intractable Rare Dis Res       Date:  2018-08

6.  Integrated image data and medical record management for rare disease registries. A general framework and its instantiation to theGerman Calciphylaxis Registry.

Authors:  Thomas M Deserno; Daniel Haak; Vincent Brandenburg; Verena Deserno; Christoph Classen; Paula Specht
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 7.  Informed consent process for patient participation in rare disease registries linked to biorepositories.

Authors:  Yaffa R Rubinstein; Stephen C Groft; Sara Hull Chandros; Julie Kaneshiro; Barbara Karp; Nicole C Lockhart; Patricia A Marshall; Richard T Moxley; Geraldine B Pollen; Vanessa Rangel Miller; Jack Schwartz
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2011-10-24       Impact factor: 2.226

8.  Malignant hyperthermia and the clinical significance of type-1 ryanodine receptor gene (RYR1) variants: proceedings of the 2013 MHAUS Scientific Conference.

Authors:  Sheila Riazi; Natalia Kraeva; Sheila M Muldoon; James Dowling; Clara Ho; Maria-Alexandra Petre; Jerome Parness; Robert T Dirksen; Henry Rosenberg
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2014-09-05       Impact factor: 5.063

9.  The NIH Office of Rare Diseases Research patient registry Standard: a report from the University of New Mexico's Oculopharyngeal Muscular Dystrophy Patient Registry.

Authors:  Shamsi Daneshvari; Sarah Youssof; Philip J Kroth
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2013-11-16

10.  A methodology for a minimum data set for rare diseases to support national centers of excellence for healthcare and research.

Authors:  Rémy Choquet; Meriem Maaroufi; Albane de Carrara; Claude Messiaen; Emmanuel Luigi; Paul Landais
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 4.497

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.