Literature DB >> 20608989

Role of drugs and devices in patients at risk of sudden cardiac death.

Giuseppe Boriani1, Igor Diemberger, Cinzia Valzania, Mauro Biffi, Cristian Martignani, Emanuel Raschi, Valentina Mantovani, Matteo Ziacchi, Matteo Bertini, Fabrizio De Ponti, Angelo Branzi.   

Abstract

The search for effective treatment for preventing sudden cardiac death (SCD) initially started with anti-arrhythmic agents in high-risk patients, but the use of randomized controlled trials clearly led to the conclusion that an approach based on anti-arrhythmic agents is not useful, and sometimes potentially harmful (the risk of arrhythmic death was increased up to 159% in CAST study). Today the approach to SCD prevention includes considering both the setting of patients who have already presented a cardiac arrest or a malignant ventricular tachyarrhythmias (secondary prevention of SCD) and the much broader setting of primary prevention in patients at variable degrees of identifiable risk. For secondary prevention of SCD, implantable cardioverter defibrillation is now the standard of care (the risk of overall mortality may be reduced by 20-31%), and anti-arrhythmic agents, specifically amiodarone, have only a complementary role (for reducing device activations or for preventing atrial fibrillation). For primary prevention of SCD in high-risk patients, cardioverter defibrillators have nowadays specific indications in patients with left ventricular dysfunction (often in combination with cardiac resynchronization therapy), where the risk of overall mortality may be reduced by 23-54%. For the large number of subjects who have some risk of SCD, but are not identified as at high risk of SCD, a series of drugs could exert a favorable effect (beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blocker agents, statins, omega-3 fatty acids and aldosterone antagonists), and for some of them evidence is emerging, from subgroup analysis, of possible SCD prevention capabilities.
© 2010 The Authors Fundamental and Clinical Pharmacology © 2010 Société Française de Pharmacologie et de Thérapeutique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20608989     DOI: 10.1111/j.1472-8206.2010.00853.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fundam Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0767-3981            Impact factor:   2.748


  4 in total

Review 1.  Cost-effectiveness of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator in today's world.

Authors:  Giuseppe Boriani; Paolo Cimaglia; Mauro Biffi; Cristian Martignani; Matteo Ziacchi; Cinzia Valzania; Igor Diemberger
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2013-12-31

2.  Cardiac adrenergic neuronal activity, sleep apnea, and potential therapeutic role of nocturnal ventilatory assistance in patients with heart failure.

Authors:  Diwakar Jain
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Influence of time between last myocardial infarction and prophylactic implantable defibrillator implant on device detections and therapies. "Routine Practice" data from the SEARCH MI registry.

Authors:  Giuseppe Boriani; Gianluca Botto; Maurizio Lunati; Alessandro Proclemer; Boris Schmidt; Ali Erdogan; Werner Rauhe; Mauro Biffi; Elisabetta Santi; Daniel Becker; Marc Messier; Massimo Santini
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 2.298

4.  Improvement of left ventricular function under cardiac resynchronization therapy goes along with a reduced incidence of ventricular arrhythmia.

Authors:  Christian Eickholt; Marcus Siekiera; Kiriakos Kirmanoglou; Astrid Rodenbeck; Nicole Heussen; Patrick Schauerte; Artur Lichtenberg; Jan Balzer; Tienush Rassaf; Stefan Perings; Malte Kelm; Dong-In Shin; Christian Meyer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.