Literature DB >> 2060876

Reflex anal dilatation: effect of parting the buttocks on anal function in normal subjects and patients with anorectal and spinal disease.

N W Read1, W M Sun.   

Abstract

Anal dilatation in response to gentle parting of the buttocks has been advocated as a sign of sexual abuse in children, but nothing is known of the physiology of this response or its existence in normal subjects, in patients with spinal disease, and in patients with a weak sphincter and whether it can be elicited after training. To answer these questions we investigated the effect of parting the buttocks on anal function. Combined anal manometry and electromyography was conducted in six normal subjects (five men, one woman, aged 19-53 years), in 18 patients with faecal incontinence (three men, 15 women, aged 30-80 years), and in seven paraplegic patients (six men, one woman, aged 25-36 years), in four of whom the posterior sacral roots had been cut. Parting the buttocks in normal subjects reduced the pressure in the anal canal from 102 (20) to 14 (3) cm H2O (mean (SEM), p less than 0.00001), but did not cause the anus to gape. This drop in pressure was associated with increased electrical activity in the external anal sphincter. Normal subjects could consciously relax the external anal sphincter and reduce the anal pressure but not so as to result in anal gaping during traction on the buttocks, even after anal dilatation. Stimulation of the anal lining by moving a probe in and out of the anal canal increased the activity of the external anal sphincter, raising anal pressures. Paraplegic patients who had lost conscious control of their external sphincters showed anal gaping when the buttocks were parted. A similar phenomenon was seen in patients with faecal incontinence who had weakness of the external anal sphincter, while incontinent patients with weakness of both sphincters showed anal gaping even at rest. Inasmuch as the results of our study can be applied to children, the data suggest that reflex anal dilatation should only be used to support a diagnosis of sexual abuse if sphincter function is otherwise normal and there is no evidence of cerebrospinal disease. Although our results do not support the notion that children could become so conditioned to repeated digital or penile penetration of the anus that they can cause the anus to gape when the buttocks are parted, neither do they exclude it.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2060876      PMCID: PMC1378886          DOI: 10.1136/gut.32.6.670

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gut        ISSN: 0017-5749            Impact factor:   23.059


  9 in total

1.  STUDIES OF THE REFLEX ACTIVITY OF THE EXTERNAL SPHINCTER ANI IN SPINAL MAN.

Authors:  J MELZAK; N H PORTER
Journal:  Paraplegia       Date:  1964-03

2.  Buggery in childhood--a common syndrome of child abuse.

Authors:  C J Hobbs; J M Wynne
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-10-04       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Voluntary relaxation of the external anal sphincter.

Authors:  G Brodén; A Dolk; C Frostell; B Nilsson; B Holmström
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 4.585

4.  Anorectal function in normal human subjects: effect of gender.

Authors:  W M Sun; N W Read
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  An analysis of anal sphincter pressure and anal compliance in normal subjects.

Authors:  C P Gibbons; J J Bannister; E A Trowbridge; N W Read
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Anal appearances and child sex abuse.

Authors:  G Clayden
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1987-03-14       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Differential diagnosis in child sexual abuse.

Authors:  F Hey; P C Buchan; J M Littlewood; R I Hall
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1987-01-31       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 8.  Investigation of the sexually abused child.

Authors:  H Zeitlin
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1987-10-10       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  External anal sphincter response to rectal distention: learned response or reflex.

Authors:  W E Whitehead; W C Orr; B T Engel; M M Schuster
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 4.016

  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  Functional outcome of stapled ileal pouch-anal canal anastomosis versus handsewn pouch-anal anastomosis.

Authors:  N Saigusa; T Kurahashi; T Nakamura; H Sugimura; S Baba; H Konno; S Nakamura
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.549

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.