Literature DB >> 20608632

How many orthopedic surgeons does it take to write a research article? 50 years of authorship proliferation in and internationalization of the orthopedic surgery literature.

Luthfur Rahman1, Sarah K Muirhead-Allwood.   

Abstract

Publications are considered to indicate academic achievement and can lead to various rewards, including job opportunities and research funding. Recent years have seen a rising trend in the number of articles published, multiple authorship, and internationalization of the biomedical literature. The goal of this study was to analyze the trends in authorship over the past 50 years to determine whether the orthopedic literature parallels trends seen in other areas of the biomedical literature. We performed an observational study with analysis of the number of authors and geographic origin of articles published in the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery British Volume (JBJS) and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research (CORR). We analyzed 2776 articles (CORR, n=1809; JBJS, n=967) published between 1958 and 2008 at 10-year intervals. There has been a significant increase in the mean number of authors per article from 1.638 to 4.08 (P<.0001) and 1.633 to 4.540 (P<.0001) for CORR and JBJS, respectively between 1958 and 2008. There has been a significant increase in the international contribution to both journals (P<.0001). The number of countries contributing to articles increased from 5 to 39 and from 17 to 33 for CORR and JBJS, respectively. These findings are similar to other areas of the biomedical literature. The reasons for this proliferation are multifactorial, including multicenter trials and inappropriate authorship. Guidelines for authorship and preparation of manuscripts from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors or from individual journals are widely available, and every effort should be made to adhere to them to prevent inappropriate authorship proliferation in the future. Copyright 2010, SLACK Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20608632     DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20100526-06

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopedics        ISSN: 0147-7447            Impact factor:   1.390


  7 in total

1.  Ethics of using language editing services in an era of digital communication and heavily multi-authored papers.

Authors:  George A Lozano
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Writers Blocked: On the Wrongs of Research Co-authorship and Some Possible Strategies for Improvement.

Authors:  Daniela Cutas; David Shaw
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  Criteria for authorship in bioethics.

Authors:  David B Resnik; Zubin Master
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 11.229

4.  Have Residents Produced More Research Since the Inception of the 80-Hour Workweek?

Authors:  David M Levy; Timothy J Luchetti; Brett R Levine
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2017

5.  Authorship issues.

Authors:  Sandeep B Bavdekar
Journal:  Lung India       Date:  2012-01

6.  Responsibility for scientific misconduct in collaborative papers.

Authors:  Gert Helgesson; Stefan Eriksson
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2018-09

7.  Twenty Five-Year Publication Trends in Foot and Ankle Literature: Improved Methodological Quality and Internationality With Time.

Authors:  Derek M Klavas; Jonathan Liu; Brendan M Holderread; Jason S Ahuero; Pedro E Cosculluela; Kevin E Varner; Joshua D Harris
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev       Date:  2021-02-10
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.