Literature DB >> 20607851

A GOG 210 aCGH study of gain at 1q23 in endometrioid endometrial cancer in the context of racial disparity and outcome.

Carl Morrison1, Jeffrey Miecznikowski, Kathleen M Darcy, Jean M Dolce, Eugene Kandel, Deborah O Erwin, Song Liu, Lori Shepherd, David Cohn, D Scott McMeekin, Annemarie W Block, Norma J Nowak, Larry Maxwell.   

Abstract

The goal of this study was to identify recurrent regions of genomic gain or loss in endometrial cancer of the endometrioid type in the context of racial disparities in mortality for this disease. Array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) analysis was performed on 80 frozen primary tumors from the Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG)-210 bank using the RPCI 19K BAC arrays. The 80 patients included 20 African American (AA) Stage I, 20 White (W) Stage I, 20 African American (AA) Stage IIIC/IV, and 20 White (W) Stage IIIC/IV. A separate subset of 220 endometrial cancers with outcome data was used for validation. A 1.6-Mbp region of gain at 1q23 was identified by aCGH in all AA patients and high grade W patients, but not W low grade patients. In the validation arm of 220 patients copy number gain at this region was validated using FISH and locus specific BACs. The number of AA patients in the validation arm was too small to confirm the aCGH association with racial disparity. Kaplan-Meier curves for survival showed a significant difference for gain at 1q23 versus no gain (log rank P = 0.0014). When subdivided into various groups of risk by stage and grade the survival curves showed a decreased survival for high grade and/or stage tumors, but not for low grade and/or stage endometrioid tumors. Univariate analyses for gain at 1q23 showed a significant association (P = 0.009) with survival. Multivariate analysis for gain at 1q23 did not show a significant association with survival (P = 0.14). (c) 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20607851     DOI: 10.1002/gcc.20782

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer        ISSN: 1045-2257            Impact factor:   5.006


  5 in total

Review 1.  Gynecologic cancer disparities: a report from the Health Disparities Taskforce of the Society of Gynecologic Oncology.

Authors:  Yvonne Collins; Kevin Holcomb; Eloise Chapman-Davis; Dineo Khabele; John H Farley
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 5.482

2.  Impact of age at diagnosis on racial disparities in endometrial cancer patients.

Authors:  Christopher M Tarney; Chunqiao Tian; Guisong Wang; Elizabeth A Dubil; Nicholas W Bateman; John K Chan; Mohamed A Elshaikh; Michele L Cote; Joellen M Schildkraut; Craig D Shriver; Thomas P Conrads; Chad A Hamilton; G Larry Maxwell; Kathleen M Darcy
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  Assessing the prognostic role of ATR mutation in endometrioid endometrial cancer: An NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

Authors:  Israel Zighelboim; Shamshad Ali; Heather A Lankes; Floor Backes; Kathleen Moore; David Mutch; Katina Robison; Kian Behbakht; Steven Waggoner; Rahel G Ghebre; Michael Pearl; Nilsa C Ramirez; Paul Goodfellow
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 5.482

4.  Analysis of PSPHL as a Candidate Gene Influencing the Racial Disparity in Endometrial Cancer.

Authors:  Jay E Allard; Gadisetti V R Chandramouli; Katherine Stagliano; Brian L Hood; Tracy Litzi; Yutaka Shoji; Jeff Boyd; Andrew Berchuck; Thomas P Conrads; G Larry Maxwell; John I Risinger
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2012-07-04       Impact factor: 6.244

5.  Are race-specific ERCC1 haplotypes in melanoma cases versus controls related to the predictive and prognostic value of ERCC1 N118N?

Authors:  Rui Gao; Kelie M Reece; Tristan Sissung; Samuel H Fu; David J Venzon; Eddie Reed; Shawn D Spencer; Douglas K Price; William D Figg
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 2.692

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.