Literature DB >> 20607630

Endoscopic resection of "giant" colorectal lesions: long-term outcome and safety.

R Hochdörffer1, A Eickhoff, D Apel, J C Eickhoff, D Hartmann, R Jakobs, J F Riemann.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Today, endoscopic resection is a standard procedure for the resection of colonic polyps. Before the establishment of endoscopic techniques, the surgical approach was a clearly preferred method for removal of polyps with a size larger than three centimeters. The safety and effectiveness concerning endoscopic resections of colorectal polyps also with a size of more than 3 cm have been demonstrated in numerous studies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from 165 patients (age: 68 +/- 10.4 years) harboring 167 polyps with a minimum diameter of 3 cm were retrospectively evaluated. Objects of interest were macroscopic morphology and histopathology of the polyps, their localization in the colon, the modality of endoscopic resection and follow-up. In those cases with macroscopic signs of malignancy the patients were excluded.
RESULTS: Successful endoscopic resections were obtained in 72.5 %. Therefrom, resection in the piecemeal-technique was necessary in 73.6 %. Recurrence polyps after endoscopic complete resections occurred in 26.3 % after a mean follow-up of 16 +/- 12.5 months. We registered a complication rate of 19.2 %. Relevant bleeding and perforation were registered as early complications in 18.6 %. We observed no intervention-related mortality.
CONCLUSION: Endoscopic mucosal resection is a safe and efficient method even for removing giant colorectal polyps. Controls are recommended at defined intervals for detecting polyp recurrence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20607630     DOI: 10.1055/s-0028-1109971

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Z Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0044-2771            Impact factor:   2.000


  8 in total

1.  Malignant recurrence and distal metastasis after complete local resection of colorectal "high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia": incidence and risk factors.

Authors:  Xu Biao Wei; Lei Xin; Jun Hao
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Sequential endoscopic and surgical removal of giant rectal adenomas extending to the dentate line.

Authors:  A Rickenbacher; P Bauerfeind; F Rössler; M Turina
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 3.  [Colorectal adenoma: pro conventional/laparoscopic resection].

Authors:  S Rüth; J Spatz; M Anthuber
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 4.  [Colorectal adenoma: pro-endoscopic removal].

Authors:  A Probst; H Messmann
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 0.955

5.  Snaring large serrated polyps.

Authors:  Jennifer Liang; Matthew F Kalady; James Church
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Warning for unprincipled colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: accurate diagnosis and reasonable treatment strategy.

Authors:  Shinji Tanaka; Motomi Terasaki; Nana Hayashi; Shiro Oka; Kazuaki Chayama
Journal:  Dig Endosc       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 7.559

Review 7.  Is There an Indication for Surgical Resection in Colorectal Adenoma?

Authors:  Stefan Rüth; Johann Spatz; Matthias Anthuber
Journal:  Viszeralmedizin       Date:  2014-02

8.  Safety of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) of large non-pedunculated colorectal adenomas in the elderly.

Authors:  K Bronsgeest; J F Huisman; A Langers; J J Boonstra; B E Schenk; W H de Vos Tot Nederveen Cappel; H F A Vasen; J C H Hardwick
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 2.571

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.