Literature DB >> 20607146

Sign Lowering and Phonetic Reduction in American Sign Language.

Martha E Tyrone1, Claude E Mauk.   

Abstract

This study examines sign lowering as a form of phonetic reduction in American Sign Language. Phonetic reduction occurs in the course of normal language production, when instead of producing a carefully articulated form of a word, the language user produces a less clearly articulated form. When signs are produced in context by native signers, they often differ from the citation forms of signs. In some cases, phonetic reduction is manifested as a sign being produced at a lower location than in the citation form. Sign lowering has been documented previously, but this is the first study to examine it in phonetic detail. The data presented here are tokens of the sign WONDER, as produced by six native signers, in two phonetic contexts and at three signing rates, which were captured by optoelectronic motion capture. The results indicate that sign lowering occurred for all signers, according to the factors we manipulated. Sign production was affected by several phonetic factors that also influence speech production, namely, production rate, phonetic context, and position within an utterance. In addition, we have discovered interesting variations in sign production, which could underlie distinctions in signing style, analogous to accent or voice quality in speech.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 20607146      PMCID: PMC2895670          DOI: 10.1016/j.wocn.2010.02.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phon        ISSN: 0095-4470


  11 in total

1.  Pointing in 3D space to remembered targets. II. Effects of movement speed toward kinesthetically defined targets.

Authors:  S V Adamovich; M B Berkinblit; O Fookson; H Poizner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Tactile feedback contributes to consistency of finger movements during typing.

Authors:  Ely Rabin; Andrew M Gordon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-12-19       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Movement velocity effects on kinaesthetic localisation of spatial positions.

Authors:  S Chieffi; M Conson; S Carlomagno
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-05-04       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Declination of supralaryngeal gestures in spoken Italian.

Authors:  M Vayra; C A Fowler
Journal:  Phonetica       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.759

5.  Optimizing rapid aiming behaviour: Movement kinematics depend on the cost of corrective modifications.

Authors:  James Lyons; Steve Hansen; Suzanne Hurding; Digby Elliott
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-03-31       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Palilalia in sign language.

Authors:  Martha E Tyrone; Bencie Woll
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2008-01-08       Impact factor: 9.910

7.  Elderly subjects are impaired in spatial coordination in fine motor control.

Authors:  J L Contreras-Vidal; H L Teulings; G E Stelmach
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1998-11

8.  Effects of speaking rate on tongue position and velocity of movement in vowel production.

Authors:  J E Flege
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  The effects of linguistic stress on ASL signs.

Authors:  R B Wilbur; B S Schick
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  1987 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.500

10.  A qualitative dynamic analysis of reiterant speech production: phase portraits, kinematics, and dynamic modeling.

Authors:  J A Kelso; E Vatikiotis-Bateson; E L Saltzman; B Kay
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  6 in total

1.  Dataglove measurement of joint angles in sign language handshapes.

Authors:  Petra Eccarius; Rebecca Bour; Robert A Scheidt
Journal:  Sign Lang Linguist       Date:  2012

2.  Location in ASL: Insights from phonetic variation.

Authors:  Claude E Mauk; Martha E Tyrone
Journal:  Sign Lang Linguist       Date:  2012-04-01

Review 3.  Gesture, sign, and language: The coming of age of sign language and gesture studies.

Authors:  Susan Goldin-Meadow; Diane Brentari
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 12.579

4.  How to distinguish gesture from sign: New technology is not the answer.

Authors:  Karen Emmorey
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 12.579

5.  Phonetic reduction and variation in American Sign Language: A quantitative study of sign lowering.

Authors:  Martha E Tyrone; Claude E Mauk
Journal:  Lab Phonol       Date:  2012-10-01

6.  Synchronizing eye tracking and optical motion capture: How to bring them together.

Authors:  Birgitta Burger; Anna Puupponen; Tommi Jantunen
Journal:  J Eye Mov Res       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 0.957

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.