BACKGROUND: Although guidelines recommend similar evaluation and treatment for both sexes, differences in approach and outcomes have been reported. DESIGN: Prospective, observational registry. METHODS: Consecutive patients at high cardiovascular risk were assessed for risk factors and management at baseline,and followed-up for 2 years. RESULTS: Twenty-two thousand and twenty-eight patients with documented arterial disease (symptomatic) or three or more atherothrombotic risk factors (asymptomatic) completed the 2-year follow-up of the REduction of Atherothrombosis for Continued Health Registry in Europe (women, 31.5%; men, 68.4%). Women patients were 3.3 years (mean) older than men. Few differences were observed between asymptomatic men and women in risk factor profile or management at baseline. Higher proportions of symptomatic women than men had diabetes (P<0.001), hypertension (P<0.0001), elevated total cholesterol levels (P<0.0001) or elevated triglycerides (P<0.01). A much lower proportion of women than men were current smokers (asymptomatic, 14.6 vs. 29.3%; symptomatic, 11.9 vs.19.5%, both P<0.0001). Within the symptomatic population, women received antithrombotic agents (91.8 vs. 94.9%,P<0.0001) and lipid-lowering agents (68.2 vs. 73.1%, P<0.0001) less frequently than men. After multivariate adjustment,fewer symptomatic women than men had undergone coronary revascularizations at 2 years (odds ratio, 0.72; 95% confidence interval, 0.61-0.85). There were no differences in primary outcomes, including cardiovascular death/myocardial infarction/stroke (odds ratio, 1.01, 95% confidence interval, 0.93-1.11, P=0.78), between the sexes. DISCUSSION: Although no differences were found in cardiovascular event rates at 2-year follow-up, secondary prevention could be improved in women, which might further reduce event rates.
BACKGROUND: Although guidelines recommend similar evaluation and treatment for both sexes, differences in approach and outcomes have been reported. DESIGN: Prospective, observational registry. METHODS: Consecutive patients at high cardiovascular risk were assessed for risk factors and management at baseline,and followed-up for 2 years. RESULTS: Twenty-two thousand and twenty-eight patients with documented arterial disease (symptomatic) or three or more atherothrombotic risk factors (asymptomatic) completed the 2-year follow-up of the REduction of Atherothrombosis for Continued Health Registry in Europe (women, 31.5%; men, 68.4%). Womenpatients were 3.3 years (mean) older than men. Few differences were observed between asymptomatic men and women in risk factor profile or management at baseline. Higher proportions of symptomatic women than men had diabetes (P<0.001), hypertension (P<0.0001), elevated total cholesterol levels (P<0.0001) or elevated triglycerides (P<0.01). A much lower proportion of women than men were current smokers (asymptomatic, 14.6 vs. 29.3%; symptomatic, 11.9 vs.19.5%, both P<0.0001). Within the symptomatic population, women received antithrombotic agents (91.8 vs. 94.9%,P<0.0001) and lipid-lowering agents (68.2 vs. 73.1%, P<0.0001) less frequently than men. After multivariate adjustment,fewer symptomatic women than men had undergone coronary revascularizations at 2 years (odds ratio, 0.72; 95% confidence interval, 0.61-0.85). There were no differences in primary outcomes, including cardiovascular death/myocardial infarction/stroke (odds ratio, 1.01, 95% confidence interval, 0.93-1.11, P=0.78), between the sexes. DISCUSSION: Although no differences were found in cardiovascular event rates at 2-year follow-up, secondary prevention could be improved in women, which might further reduce event rates.
Authors: Giuliano Tocci; Andrea Ferrucci; Jasmine Passerini; Maurizio Averna; Paolo Bellotti; Graziella Bruno; Francesco Cosentino; Gaetano Crepaldi; Cristina Giannattasio; Maria Grazia Modena; Giulio Nati; Antonio Tiengo; Bruno Trimarco; Diego Vanuzzo; Massimo Volpe Journal: High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev Date: 2011-06-01
Authors: Maria Pabon; Susan Cheng; S Elissa Altin; Sanjum S Sethi; Michael D Nelson; Kerrie L Moreau; Naomi Hamburg; Connie N Hess Journal: Circ Res Date: 2022-02-17 Impact factor: 23.213
Authors: Dirk De Bacquer; Delphine De Smedt; Kornelia Kotseva; Catriona Jennings; David Wood; Lars Rydén; Viveca Gyberg; Bahira Shahim; Philippe Amouyel; Jan Bruthans; Almudena Castro Conde; Renata Cífková; Jaap W Deckers; Johan De Sutter; Mirza Dilic; Maryna Dolzhenko; Andrejs Erglis; Zlatko Fras; Dan Gaita; Nina Gotcheva; John Goudevenos; Peter Heuschmann; Aleksandras Laucevicius; Seppo Lehto; Dragan Lovic; Davor Miličić; David Moore; Evagoras Nicolaides; Raphael Oganov; Andrzej Pajak; Nana Pogosova; Zeljko Reiner; Martin Stagmo; Stefan Störk; Lale Tokgözoğlu; Dusko Vulic; Martin Wagner; Guy De Backer Journal: Eur J Epidemiol Date: 2018-10-23 Impact factor: 8.082
Authors: Tom G Briffa; Lee J Nedkoff; Matthew W Knuiman; Graeme J Hankey; Paul E Norman; Joseph Hung; Peter L Thompson; Siobhan Hickling; Alexandra Bremner; Frank M Sanfilippo Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2013-11-20 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Jose Luis Clua-Espuny; Rosa Ripolles-Vicente; Carlos Lopez-Pablo; Anna Panisello-Tafalla; Jorgina Lucas-Noll; Cristina Calduch-Noll; M Antonia González-Henares; M Lluisa Queralt-Tomas Journal: Aten Primaria Date: 2014-06-19 Impact factor: 1.137