Literature DB >> 20606404

Femorotibial cartilage morphology: reproducibility of different metrics and femoral regions, and sensitivity to change in disease.

M Hudelmaier1, W Wirth, B Wehr, V Kraus, B T Wyman, M-P Hellio Le Graverand, F Eckstein.   

Abstract

This study was designed to characterize the reproducibility and sensitivity to change of magnetic resonance imaging-based cartilage morphology metrics and femoral regions of interest (ROIs), in order to provide preferable outcome measures in longitudinal studies of cartilage morphology. Test-retest acquisitions were obtained at 3 tesla (T) in 33 subjects with and without radiographic signs of osteoarthritis (OA) (reproducibility study) as well as baseline and 2-year follow-up acquisitions in 28 subjects with radiographic signs of advanced OA (sensitivity study). Cartilage was segmented in the tibia and two distinct anatomical femoral ROIs, a 'long' ROI extending 60% from the trochlear notch to the posterior end of the condyles, and a 'short' ROI extending to the intercondylar bone bridge. Coefficients of variation (reproducibility study) and standardized response means (SRMs, sensitivity study) were obtained for different morphology metrics and anatomical regions. The subchondral bone area of the long ROI was 20% greater and less variable than that of the short ROI; cartilage morphology metrics were generally more reproducible in the long ROI. Normalized cartilage volume (VCtAB) and mean cartilage thickness (over the entire subchondral bone area; ThCtAB.Me) tended to be more reproducible and more sensitive to change (SRM up to -0.62) than cartilage volume (SRM up to -0.44), cartilage thickness over the cartilaginous area (ThCcAB; SRM up to -0.48) or maximum cartilage thickness (ThCtAB; SRM up to -0.35). The long femoral cartilage ROI provided more reproducible measurements than the short one. VCtAB and ThCtAB.Me may be preferable metrics in longitudinal studies of articular cartilage adaptation or OA.
Copyright © 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20606404     DOI: 10.1159/000318178

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cells Tissues Organs        ISSN: 1422-6405            Impact factor:   2.481


  9 in total

1.  Comparison of 1-year vs 2-year change in regional cartilage thickness in osteoarthritis results from 346 participants from the Osteoarthritis Initiative.

Authors:  W Wirth; S Larroque; R Y Davies; M Nevitt; A Gimona; F Baribaud; J H Lee; O Benichou; B T Wyman; M Hudelmaier; S Maschek; F Eckstein
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2010-10-31       Impact factor: 6.576

2.  Use magnetic resonance imaging to assess articular cartilage.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Wang; Anita E Wluka; Graeme Jones; Changhai Ding; Flavia M Cicuttini
Journal:  Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 5.346

Review 3.  Imaging of cartilage and bone: promises and pitfalls in clinical trials of osteoarthritis.

Authors:  F Eckstein; A Guermazi; G Gold; J Duryea; M-P Hellio Le Graverand; W Wirth; C G Miller
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 6.576

4.  Trajectory of cartilage loss within 4 years of knee replacement--a nested case-control study from the osteoarthritis initiative.

Authors:  F Eckstein; R M Boudreau; Z Wang; M J Hannon; W Wirth; S Cotofana; A Guermazi; F Roemer; M Nevitt; M R John; C Ladel; L Sharma; D J Hunter; C K Kwoh
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 6.576

5.  Equivalence and precision of knee cartilage morphometry between different segmentation teams, cartilage regions, and MR acquisitions.

Authors:  E Schneider; M Nevitt; C McCulloch; F M Cicuttini; J Duryea; F Eckstein; J Tamez-Pena
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2012-04-17       Impact factor: 6.576

6.  Reference values and Z-scores for subregional femorotibial cartilage thickness--results from a large population-based sample (Framingham) and comparison with the non-exposed Osteoarthritis Initiative reference cohort.

Authors:  F Eckstein; M Yang; A Guermazi; F W Roemer; M Hudelmaier; K Picha; F Baribaud; W Wirth; D T Felson
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 6.576

7.  Minimum joint space width (mJSW) of patellofemoral joint on standing "skyline" radiographs: test-retest reproducibility and comparison with quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (qMRI).

Authors:  Paolo Simoni; Sanaa Jamali; Adelin Albert; Saara Totterman; Edward Schreyer; Jose G Tamez-Peña; Bruno Beomonte Zobel; Victoria Alvarez Miezentseva; Philippe Gillet
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2013-08-24       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Quantitative cartilage imaging in knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Felix Eckstein; Wolfgang Wirth
Journal:  Arthritis       Date:  2010-12-08

9.  Validation of an active shape model-based semi-automated segmentation algorithm for the analysis of thigh muscle and adipose tissue cross-sectional areas.

Authors:  Jana Kemnitz; Felix Eckstein; Adam G Culvenor; Anja Ruhdorfer; Torben Dannhauer; Susanne Ring-Dimitriou; Alexandra M Sänger; Wolfgang Wirth
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 2.310

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.