Literature DB >> 20606148

Effect of glucosamine on pain-related disability in patients with chronic low back pain and degenerative lumbar osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial.

Philip Wilkens1, Inger B Scheel, Oliver Grundnes, Christian Hellum, Kjersti Storheim.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Chronic low back pain (LBP) with degenerative lumbar osteoarthritis (OA) is widespread in the adult population. Although glucosamine is increasingly used by patients with chronic LBP, little is known about its effect in this setting.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of glucosamine in patients with chronic LBP and degenerative lumbar OA. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial conducted at Oslo University Hospital Outpatient Clinic, Oslo, Norway, with 250 patients older than 25 years of age with chronic LBP (>6 months) and degenerative lumbar OA.
INTERVENTIONS: Daily intake of 1500 mg of oral glucosamine (n = 125) or placebo (n = 125) for 6 months, with assessment of effect after the 6-month intervention period and at 1 year (6 months postintervention). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was pain-related disability measured with the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ). Secondary outcomes were numerical scores from pain-rating scales of patients at rest and during activity, and the quality-of-life EuroQol-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) instrument. Data collection occurred during the intervention period at baseline, 6 weeks, 3 and 6 months, and again 6 months following the intervention at 1 year. Group differences were analyzed using linear mixed models analysis.
RESULTS: At baseline, mean RMDQ scores were 9.2 (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.4-10.0) for glucosamine and 9.7 (95% CI, 8.9-10.5) for the placebo group (P = .37). At 6 months, the mean RMDQ score was the same for the glucosamine and placebo groups (5.0; 95% CI, 4.2-5.8). At 1 year, the mean RMDQ scores were 4.8 (95% CI, 3.9-5.6) for glucosamine and 5.5 (95% CI, 4.7-6.4) for the placebo group. No statistically significant difference in change between groups was found when assessed after the 6-month intervention period and at 1 year: RMDQ (P = .72), LBP at rest (P = .91), LBP during activity (P = .97), and quality-of-life EQ-5D (P = .20). Mild adverse events were reported in 40 patients in the glucosamine group and 46 in the placebo group (P = .48).
CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with chronic LBP and degenerative lumbar OA, 6-month treatment with oral glucosamine compared with placebo did not result in reduced pain-related disability after the 6-month intervention and after 1-year follow-up. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00404079.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20606148     DOI: 10.1001/jama.2010.893

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  19 in total

1.  Use of glucosamine and chondroitin in relation to mortality.

Authors:  Griffith A Bell; Elizabeth D Kantor; Johanna W Lampe; Danny D Shen; Emily White
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 8.082

Review 2.  Efficacy of duloxetine versus alternative oral therapies: an indirect comparison of randomised clinical trials in chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Hélène Cawston; Alison Davie; Marie-Ange Paget; Vladimir Skljarevski; Michael Happich
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-05-18       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Nutraceuticals in the management of osteoarthritis : a critical review.

Authors:  Ryan L Ragle; Allen D Sawitzke
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 3.923

4.  Glucosamine supplementation demonstrates a negative effect on intervertebral disc matrix in an animal model of disc degeneration.

Authors:  Lloydine Jacobs; Nam Vo; Joao Paulo Coelho; Qing Dong; Bernard Bechara; Barrett Woods; Eric Hempen; Robert Hartman; Harry Preuss; Judith Balk; James Kang; Gwendolyn Sowa
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-05-20       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  The effects of glucosamine sulfate on intervertebral disc annulus fibrosus cells in vitro.

Authors:  Gwendolyn A Sowa; J Paulo Coelho; Lloydine J Jacobs; Kasey Komperda; Nora Sherry; Nam V Vo; Harry G Preuss; Judith L Balk; Jame D Kang
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 4.166

6.  Phase II study of glucosamine with chondroitin on aromatase inhibitor-associated joint symptoms in women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Heather Greenlee; Katherine D Crew; Theresa Shao; Grace Kranwinkel; Kevin Kalinsky; Matthew Maurer; Lois Brafman; Beverly Insel; Wei Yann Tsai; Dawn L Hershman
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of eszopiclone for the treatment of insomnia in patients with chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Harold W Goforth; Xavier A Preud'homme; Andrew D Krystal
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2014-06-01       Impact factor: 5.849

8.  The use of glucosamine for chronic low back pain: a systematic review of randomised control trials.

Authors:  Reena Sodha; Naveethan Sivanadarajah; Mahbub Alam
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  No effect of 6-month intake of glucosamine sulfate on Modic changes or high intensity zones in the lumbar spine: sub-group analysis of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Philip Wilkens; Kjersti Storheim; Inger Scheel; Linda Berg; Ansgar Espeland
Journal:  J Negat Results Biomed       Date:  2012-08-17

Review 10.  Generic Preference-based Measures for Low Back Pain: Which of Them Should Be Used?

Authors:  Aureliano Paolo Finch; Melina Dritsaki; Claudio Jommi
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 3.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.