Literature DB >> 20605850

The development and validation of a novel questionnaire to measure patient and family satisfaction with end-of-life care: the Canadian Health Care Evaluation Project (CANHELP) Questionnaire.

Daren K Heyland1, Deborah J Cook, Graeme M Rocker, Peter M Dodek, Demetrios J Kutsogiannis, Yoanna Skrobik, Xuran Jiang, Andrew G Day, S Robin Cohen.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to further validate a novel instrument to measure satisfaction with end-of-life care, called the Canadian Health Care Evaluation Project (CANHELP) questionnaire. Data were collected by a cross-sectional survey of patients who had advanced, life-limiting illnesses and their family caregivers, and who completed CANHELP, a global rating of satisfaction, and a quality of life questionnaire. We conducted factor analysis, assessed internal consistency using Cronbach's alpha, and evaluated construct validity by describing the correlation amongst CANHELP, global rating of satisfaction and the quality of life questionnaire scores. There were 361 patient and 193 family questionnaires available for analysis. In the factor analysis, we identified six easily interpretable factors which explained 55.4% and 60.2% of the variance for the patient and caregiver questionnaire, respectively. For the patient version, the subscales derived from these factors were Relationship with Doctors, Illness Management, Communication, Decision-Making, Role of the Family, and Your Well-being. For the family questionnaire, the factors were Relationship with Doctors, Characteristics of Doctors and Nurses, Illness Management, Communication and Decision-Making, Your Involvement, and Your Well-being. Each subscale for each questionnaire had acceptable to excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha ranged from 0.69-0.94). We observed good correlations between the CANHELP overall satisfaction score and global rating of satisfaction (correlation coefficient 0.49 and 0.63 for patient and family, respectively) which was greater than the correlations between CANHELP and the quality of life instruments. We conclude that the CANHELP Questionnaire is a valid and internally consistent instrument to measure satisfaction with end-of-life care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20605850     DOI: 10.1177/0269216310373168

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Palliat Med        ISSN: 0269-2163            Impact factor:   4.762


  34 in total

1.  Defining priorities for improving end-of-life care in Canada.

Authors:  Daren K Heyland; Deborah J Cook; Graeme M Rocker; Peter M Dodek; Demetrios J Kutsogiannis; Yoanna Skrobik; Xuran Jiang; Andrew G Day; S Robin Cohen
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  What really matters in end-of-life discussions? Perspectives of patients in hospital with serious illness and their families.

Authors:  John J You; Peter Dodek; Francois Lamontagne; James Downar; Tasnim Sinuff; Xuran Jiang; Andrew G Day; Daren K Heyland
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Increased access to palliative care and hospice services: opportunities to improve value in health care.

Authors:  Diane E Meier
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.911

4.  New measures to capture end of life concerns in Huntington disease: Meaning and Purpose and Concern with Death and Dying from HDQLIFE (a patient-reported outcomes measurement system).

Authors:  N E Carlozzi; N R Downing; M K McCormack; S G Schilling; J S Perlmutter; E A Hahn; J S Lai; S Frank; K A Quaid; J S Paulsen; D Cella; S M Goodnight; J A Miner; M A Nance
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Satisfaction with oncology care among patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers.

Authors:  Breffni Hannon; Nadia Swami; Monika K Krzyzanowska; Natasha Leighl; Gary Rodin; Lisa W Le; Camilla Zimmermann
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2013-02-23       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 6.  Measuring Experience With End-of-Life Care: A Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Jessica Penn Lendon; Sangeeta C Ahluwalia; Anne M Walling; Karl A Lorenz; Oluwatobi A Oluwatola; Rebecca Anhang Price; Denise Quigley; Joan M Teno
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 3.612

7.  Design and Preliminary Testing of the Caregiver-Centered Communication Questionnaire (CCCQ).

Authors:  George Demiris; Freda DeKeyser Ganz; Claire J Han; Kenneth Pike; Debra Parker Oliver; Karla Washington
Journal:  J Palliat Care       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 2.250

Review 8.  Challenges and facilitators in delivering optimal care at the End of Life for older patients: a scoping review on the clinicians' perspective.

Authors:  Samantha Fien; Emily Plunkett; Claudia Fien; Sally Greenaway; Daren K Heyland; Justin Clark; Magnolia Cardona
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2021-03-13       Impact factor: 3.636

9.  Default options in advance directives influence how patients set goals for end-of-life care.

Authors:  Scott D Halpern; George Loewenstein; Kevin G Volpp; Elizabeth Cooney; Kelly Vranas; Caroline M Quill; Mary S McKenzie; Michael O Harhay; Nicole B Gabler; Tatiana Silva; Robert Arnold; Derek C Angus; Cindy Bryce
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 6.301

10.  Implementing a palliative care trial in advanced COPD: a feasibility assessment (the COPD IMPACT study).

Authors:  Robert Horton; Graeme Rocker; Andrea Dale; Joanne Young; Paul Hernandez; Tasnim Sinuff
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.947

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.