Literature DB >> 20605552

Physical examination and self-reported pain outcomes from a randomized trial on chronic cervicogenic headache.

Darcy Vavrek1, Mitchell Haas, Dave Peterson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Objective clinical measures for use as surrogate markers of cervicogenic headache (CGH) pain have not been established. In this analysis, we investigate relationships between objective physical examination (PE) measures with self-reported CGH outcomes.
METHODS: This is an exploratory analysis of data generated by attention control PE from an open-label randomized clinical trial. Of 80 subjects, 40 were randomized to 8 treatments (spinal manipulative therapy or light massage control) and 8 PE over 8 weeks. The remaining subjects received no PE. Physical examination included motion palpation of the cervical and upper thoracic regions, active cervical range of motion (ROM) and associated pain, and algometric pain threshold evaluated over articular pillars. Self-reported outcomes included CGH and neck pain and disability, number of CGH headaches, and related disability days. Associations between PE and self-reported outcomes were evaluated using generalized linear models, adjusting for sociodemographic differences and study group.
RESULTS: At baseline, number of CGH and disability days were strongly associated with cervical active ROM (P < .001 to .037). Neck pain and disability were strongly associated with ROM-elicited pain (P < .001 to .035) but not later in the study. After the final treatment, pain thresholds were strongly associated with week 12 neck pain and disability and CGH disability and disability days (P < or = .001 to .048).
CONCLUSIONS: Cervical ROM was most associated with the baseline headache experience. However, 4 weeks after treatment, algometric pain thresholds were most associated. No one PE measure remained associated with the self-reported headache outcomes over time. Copyright (c) 2010 National University of Health Sciences. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20605552      PMCID: PMC2917237          DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2010.05.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther        ISSN: 0161-4754            Impact factor:   1.437


  37 in total

1.  Evaluation of two time-specific back pain outcome measures.

Authors:  M R Underwood; A G Barnett; M R Vickers
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Spinal manipulative therapy in the management of cervicogenic headache.

Authors:  Cesar Fernández-de-Las-Peñas; Cristina Alonso-Blanco; Maria Luz Cuadrado; Juan A Pareja
Journal:  Headache       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.887

3.  Dose response for chiropractic care of chronic cervicogenic headache and associated neck pain: a randomized pilot study.

Authors:  Mitchell Haas; Elyse Groupp; Mikel Aickin; Alisa Fairweather; Bonnie Ganger; Michael Attwood; Cathy Cummins; Laura Baffes
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.437

Review 4.  Systematic review of randomized clinical trials of complementary/alternative therapies in the treatment of tension-type and cervicogenic headache.

Authors:  H Vernon; C S McDermaid; C Hagino
Journal:  Complement Ther Med       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 2.446

5.  A treatment allocation procedure for sequential clinical trials.

Authors:  C B Begg; B Iglewicz
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Trends in alternative medicine use in the United States, 1990-1997: results of a follow-up national survey.

Authors:  D M Eisenberg; R B Davis; S L Ettner; S Appel; S Wilkey; M Van Rompay; R C Kessler
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-11-11       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  The efficacy of spinal manipulation, amitriptyline and the combination of both therapies for the prophylaxis of migraine headache.

Authors:  C F Nelson; G Bronfort; R Evans; P Boline; C Goldsmith; A V Anderson
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 1.437

8.  Interrater reliability of algometry in measuring pressure pain thresholds in healthy humans, using multiple raters.

Authors:  Linda S Chesterton; Julius Sim; Christine C Wright; Nadine E Foster
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.442

9.  A practice-based study of patients with acute and chronic low back pain attending primary care and chiropractic physicians: two-week to 48-month follow-up.

Authors:  Mitchell Haas; Bruce Goldberg; Mikel Aickin; Bonnie Ganger; Michael Attwood
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.437

10.  A randomized controlled trial of the effect of spinal manipulation in the treatment of cervicogenic headache.

Authors:  N Nilsson
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 1.437

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Conservative physical therapy management for the treatment of cervicogenic headache: a systematic review.

Authors:  Stephanie Racicki; Sarah Gerwin; Stacy Diclaudio; Samuel Reinmann; Megan Donaldson
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2013-05

2.  Effects of cervical stretching and cranio-cervical flexion exercises on cervical muscle characteristics and posture of patients with cervicogenic headache.

Authors:  Seung Kyu Park; Dae Jung Yang; Je Ho Kim; Da Hang Kang; Sam Heon Park; Jong Hyuk Yoon
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2017-10-21

3.  Quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials in chiropractic using the CONSORT checklist.

Authors:  Fay Karpouzis; Rod Bonello; Mario Pribicevic; Allan Kalamir; Benjamin T Brown
Journal:  Chiropr Man Therap       Date:  2016-06-09

4.  Dose-response of spinal manipulation for cervicogenic headache: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Linda Hanson; Mitchell Haas; Gert Bronfort; Darcy Vavrek; Craig Schulz; Brent Leininger; Roni Evans; Leslie Takaki; Moni Neradilek
Journal:  Chiropr Man Therap       Date:  2016-06-08
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.