Literature DB >> 20605339

Standardized method for quantification of developing lymphedema in patients treated for breast cancer.

Marek Ancukiewicz1, Tara A Russell, Jean Otoole, Michelle Specht, Marybeth Singer, Alexandra Kelada, Colleen D Murphy, Jessica Pogachar, Valeria Gioioso, Megha Patel, Melissa Skolny, Barbara L Smith, Alphonse G Taghian.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To develop a simple and practical formula for quantifying breast cancer-related lymphedema, accounting for both the asymmetry of upper extremities' volumes and their temporal changes. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We analyzed bilateral perometer measurements of the upper extremity in a series of 677 women who prospectively underwent lymphedema screening during treatment for unilateral breast cancer at Massachusetts General Hospital between August 2005 and November 2008. Four sources of variation were analyzed: between repeated measurements on the same arm at the same session; between both arms at baseline (preoperative) visit; in follow-up measurements; and between patients. Effects of hand dominance, time since diagnosis and surgery, age, weight, and body mass index were also analyzed.
RESULTS: The statistical distribution of variation of measurements suggests that the ratio of volume ratios is most appropriate for quantification of both asymmetry and temporal changes. Therefore, we present the formula for relative volume change (RVC): RVC = (A(2)U(1))/(U(2)A(1)) - 1, where A(1), A(2) are arm volumes on the side of the treated breast at two different time points, and U(1), U(2) are volumes on the contralateral side. Relative volume change is not significantly associated with hand dominance, age, or time since diagnosis. Baseline weight correlates (p = 0.0074) with higher RVC; however, baseline body mass index or weight changes over time do not.
CONCLUSIONS: We propose the use of the RVC formula to assess the presence and course of breast cancer-related lymphedema in clinical practice and research.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20605339      PMCID: PMC2952286          DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.01.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  18 in total

1.  A comparison of four diagnostic criteria for lymphedema in a post-breast cancer population.

Authors:  Jane M Armer; Bob R Stewart
Journal:  Lymphat Res Biol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.589

2.  The problem of post-breast cancer lymphedema: impact and measurement issues.

Authors:  Jane M Armer
Journal:  Cancer Invest       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.176

3.  The use of bioimpedance analysis to evaluate lymphedema.

Authors:  Anne G Warren; Brian A Janz; Sumner A Slavin; Loren J Borud
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 1.539

4.  The psycho-social impact of lymphedema.

Authors:  Sheila H Ridner
Journal:  Lymphat Res Biol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.589

Review 5.  A review of measures of lymphedema.

Authors:  L H Gerber
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1998-12-15       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Preoperative assessment enables the early diagnosis and successful treatment of lymphedema.

Authors:  Nicole L Stout Gergich; Lucinda A Pfalzer; Charles McGarvey; Barbara Springer; Lynn H Gerber; Peter Soballe
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-06-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Home-based lymphedema treatment in patients with cancer-related lymphedema or noncancer-related lymphedema.

Authors:  Sheila H Ridner; Elizabeth McMahon; Mary S Dietrich; Sunday Hoy
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 2.172

8.  Comparison of upper limb volume measurement techniques and arm symptoms between healthy volunteers and individuals with known lymphedema.

Authors:  S H Ridner; L D Montgomery; J T Hepworth; B R Stewart; J M Armer
Journal:  Lymphology       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 1.286

9.  Lymphedema after breast cancer: incidence, risk factors, and effect on upper body function.

Authors:  Sandra C Hayes; Monika Janda; Bruce Cornish; Diana Battistutta; Beth Newman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-07-20       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  The epidemiology of arm and hand swelling in premenopausal breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Electra D Paskett; Michelle J Naughton; Thomas P McCoy; L Douglas Case; Jill M Abbott
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 4.254

View more
  43 in total

1.  Standardized approach to lymphedema screening.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Dylke; Leigh C Ward; Sharon L Kilbreath
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2013

2.  In reply.

Authors:  Jean O'Toole; Lauren S Jammallo; Cynthia L Miller; Melissa N Skolny; Michelle C Specht; Alphonse G Taghian
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2013

3.  Impact of body mass index and weight fluctuation on lymphedema risk in patients treated for breast cancer.

Authors:  Lauren S Jammallo; Cynthia L Miller; Marybeth Singer; Nora K Horick; Melissa N Skolny; Michelle C Specht; Jean O'Toole; Alphonse G Taghian
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  Timing of Lymphedema After Treatment for Breast Cancer: When Are Patients Most At Risk?

Authors:  Susan G R McDuff; Amir I Mina; Cheryl L Brunelle; Laura Salama; Laura E G Warren; Mohamed Abouegylah; Meyha Swaroop; Melissa N Skolny; Maria Asdourian; Tessa Gillespie; Kayla Daniell; Hoda E Sayegh; George E Naoum; Hui Zheng; Alphonse G Taghian
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Patients who report cording after breast cancer surgery are at higher risk of lymphedema: Results from a large prospective screening cohort.

Authors:  Cheryl L Brunelle; Sacha A Roberts; Amy M Shui; Tessa C Gillespie; Kayla M Daniell; George E Naoum; Alphonse Taghian
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 3.454

6.  Risk of lymphedema after mastectomy: potential benefit of applying ACOSOG Z0011 protocol to mastectomy patients.

Authors:  Cynthia L Miller; Michelle C Specht; Melissa N Skolny; Nora Horick; Lauren S Jammallo; Jean O'Toole; Mina N Shenouda; Betro T Sadek; Barbara L Smith; Alphonse G Taghian
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  Perometry versus simulated circumferential tape measurement for the detection of breast cancer-related lymphedema.

Authors:  Fangdi Sun; Alexander Hall; Megan P Tighe; Cheryl L Brunelle; Hoda E Sayegh; Tessa C Gillespie; Kayla M Daniell; Alphonse G Taghian
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 4.872

8.  The impact of radiation therapy on the risk of lymphedema after treatment for breast cancer: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Laura E G Warren; Cynthia L Miller; Nora Horick; Melissa N Skolny; Lauren S Jammallo; Betro T Sadek; Mina N Shenouda; Jean A O'Toole; Shannon M MacDonald; Michelle C Specht; Alphonse G Taghian
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Hand Edema in Patients at Risk of Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema: Health Professionals Should Take Notice.

Authors:  Cheryl L Brunelle; Meyha N Swaroop; Melissa N Skolny; Maria S Asdourian; Hoda E Sayegh; Alphonse G Taghian
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2018-06-01

Review 10.  Lymphedema following treatment for breast cancer: a new approach to an old problem.

Authors:  Jean O'Toole; Lauren S Jammallo; Melissa N Skolny; Cynthia L Miller; Krista Elliott; Michelle C Specht; Alphonse G Taghian
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol       Date:  2013-06-16       Impact factor: 6.312

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.