INTRODUCTION: Metastases to the brain from breast cancer have a high mortality, and basal-like breast cancers have a propensity for brain metastases. However, the mechanisms that allow cells to colonize the brain are unclear. METHODS: We used morphology, immunohistochemistry, gene expression and somatic mutation profiling to analyze 39 matched pairs of primary breast cancers and brain metastases, 22 unmatched brain metastases of breast cancer, 11 non-breast brain metastases and 6 autopsy cases of patients with breast cancer metastases to multiple sites, including the brain. RESULTS: Most brain metastases were triple negative and basal-like. The brain metastases over-expressed one or more members of the HER family and in particular HER3 was significantly over-expressed relative to matched primary tumors. Brain metastases from breast and other primary sites, and metastases to multiple organs in the autopsied cases, also contained somatic mutations in EGFR, HRAS, KRAS, NRAS or PIK3CA. This paralleled the frequent activation of AKT and MAPK pathways. In particular, activation of the MAPK pathway was increased in the brain metastases compared to the primary tumors. CONCLUSIONS: Deregulated HER family receptors, particularly HER3, and their downstream pathways are implicated in colonization of brain metastasis. The need for HER family receptors to dimerize for activation suggests that tumors may be susceptible to combinations of anti-HER family inhibitors, and may even be effective in the absence of HER2 amplification (that is, in triple negative/basal cancers). However, the presence of activating mutations in PIK3CA, HRAS, KRAS and NRAS suggests the necessity for also specifically targeting downstream molecules.
INTRODUCTION:Metastases to the brain from breast cancer have a high mortality, and basal-like breast cancers have a propensity for brain metastases. However, the mechanisms that allow cells to colonize the brain are unclear. METHODS: We used morphology, immunohistochemistry, gene expression and somatic mutation profiling to analyze 39 matched pairs of primary breast cancers and brain metastases, 22 unmatched brain metastases of breast cancer, 11 non-breast brain metastases and 6 autopsy cases of patients with breast cancer metastases to multiple sites, including the brain. RESULTS: Most brain metastases were triple negative and basal-like. The brain metastases over-expressed one or more members of the HER family and in particular HER3 was significantly over-expressed relative to matched primary tumors. Brain metastases from breast and other primary sites, and metastases to multiple organs in the autopsied cases, also contained somatic mutations in EGFR, HRAS, KRAS, NRAS or PIK3CA. This paralleled the frequent activation of AKT and MAPK pathways. In particular, activation of the MAPK pathway was increased in the brain metastases compared to the primary tumors. CONCLUSIONS: Deregulated HER family receptors, particularly HER3, and their downstream pathways are implicated in colonization of brain metastasis. The need for HER family receptors to dimerize for activation suggests that tumors may be susceptible to combinations of anti-HER family inhibitors, and may even be effective in the absence of HER2 amplification (that is, in triple negative/basal cancers). However, the presence of activating mutations in PIK3CA, HRAS, KRAS and NRAS suggests the necessity for also specifically targeting downstream molecules.
Authors: Jian-Bing Fan; Joanne M Yeakley; Marina Bibikova; Eugene Chudin; Eliza Wickham; Jing Chen; Dennis Doucet; Philippe Rigault; Baohong Zhang; Richard Shen; Celeste McBride; Hai-Ri Li; Xiang-Dong Fu; Arnold Oliphant; David L Barker; Mark S Chee Journal: Genome Res Date: 2004-05 Impact factor: 9.043
Authors: Muhammad Al-Hajj; Max S Wicha; Adalberto Benito-Hernandez; Sean J Morrison; Michael F Clarke Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2003-03-10 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Antoinette Hollestelle; Jord H A Nagel; Marcel Smid; Suzanne Lam; Fons Elstrodt; Marijke Wasielewski; Ser Sue Ng; Pim J French; Justine K Peeters; Marieke J Rozendaal; Muhammad Riaz; Daphne G Koopman; Timo L M Ten Hagen; Bertie H C G M de Leeuw; Ellen C Zwarthoff; Amina Teunisse; Peter J van der Spek; Jan G M Klijn; Winand N M Dinjens; Stephen P Ethier; Hans Clevers; Aart G Jochemsen; Michael A den Bakker; John A Foekens; John W M Martens; Mieke Schutte Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2009-07-11 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: S Bamford; E Dawson; S Forbes; J Clements; R Pettett; A Dogan; A Flanagan; J Teague; P A Futreal; M R Stratton; R Wooster Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2004-07-19 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: David P Kodack; Vasileios Askoxylakis; Gino B Ferraro; Qing Sheng; Mark Badeaux; Shom Goel; Xiaolong Qi; Ram Shankaraiah; Z Alexander Cao; Rakesh R Ramjiawan; Divya Bezwada; Bhushankumar Patel; Yongchul Song; Carlotta Costa; Kamila Naxerova; Christina S F Wong; Jonas Kloepper; Rita Das; Angela Tam; Jantima Tanboon; Dan G Duda; C Ryan Miller; Marni B Siegel; Carey K Anders; Melinda Sanders; Monica V Estrada; Robert Schlegel; Carlos L Arteaga; Elena Brachtel; Alan Huang; Dai Fukumura; Jeffrey A Engelman; Rakesh K Jain Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2017-05-24 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: C Bachmann; S Schmidt; A Staebler; T Fehm; F Fend; J Schittenhelm; D Wallwiener; E Grischke Journal: Med Oncol Date: 2014-11-30 Impact factor: 3.064
Authors: Sandhya Pande; Gillian Browne; Srivatsan Padmanabhan; Sayyed K Zaidi; Jane B Lian; Andre J van Wijnen; Janet L Stein; Gary S Stein Journal: J Cell Physiol Date: 2013-08 Impact factor: 6.384
Authors: C Bachmann; E M Grischke; T Fehm; A Staebler; J Schittenhelm; D Wallwiener Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2012-12-06 Impact factor: 4.553