Literature DB >> 20604592

A taxonomy of effect size measures for the differential functioning of items and scales.

Adam W Meade1.   

Abstract

Much progress has been made in the past 2 decades with respect to methods of identifying measurement invariance or a lack thereof. Until now, the focus of these efforts has been to establish criteria for statistical significance in items and scales that function differently across samples. The power associated with tests of differential functioning, as with all significance tests, is affected by sample size and other considerations. Additionally, statistical significance need not imply practical importance. There is a strong need as such for meaningful effect size indicators to describe the extent to which items and scales function differently. Recently developed effect size measures show promise for providing a metric to describe the amount of differential functioning present between groups. Expanding upon recent developments, this article presents a taxonomy of potential differential functioning effect sizes; several new indices of item and scale differential functioning effect size are proposed and illustrated with 2 data samples. Software created for computing these indices and graphing item- and scale-level differential functioning is described.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20604592     DOI: 10.1037/a0018966

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Psychol        ISSN: 0021-9010


  38 in total

1.  Differential item functioning analysis of the Vanderbilt Expertise Test for cars.

Authors:  Woo-Yeol Lee; Sun-Joo Cho; Rankin W McGugin; Ana Beth Van Gulick; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  After Differential Item Functioning Is Detected: IRT Item Calibration and Scoring in the Presence of DIF.

Authors:  Sun-Joo Cho; Youngsuk Suh; Woo-Yeol Lee
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2016-09-24

3.  Psychometric Evaluation of PROMIS Sexual Function and Satisfaction Measures in a Longitudinal Population-Based Cohort of Men With Localized Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Bryce B Reeve; Mian Wang; Kevin Weinfurt; Kathryn E Flynn; Deborah S Usinger; Ronald C Chen
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 3.802

4.  Model-Based Measures for Detecting and Quantifying Response Bias.

Authors:  R Philip Chalmers
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 2.500

5.  Investigating Measurement Invariance in Computer-Based Personality Testing: The Impact of Using Anchor Items on Effect Size Indices.

Authors:  Iris J L Egberink; Rob R Meijer; Jorge N Tendeiro
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 2.821

6.  An Effect Size Measure for Raju's Differential Functioning for Items and Tests.

Authors:  Keith D Wright; T C Oshima
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 2.821

7.  Fit Indices for Measurement Invariance Tests in the Thurstonian IRT Model.

Authors:  HyeSun Lee; Weldon Z Smith
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2019-12-26

8.  Examining the measurement precision and invariance of the revised get ready to read!

Authors:  Amber L Farrington; Christopher J Lonigan
Journal:  J Learn Disabil       Date:  2013-07-12

9.  UNC Perceived Message Effectiveness: Validation of a Brief Scale.

Authors:  Sabeeh A Baig; Seth M Noar; Nisha C Gottfredson; Marcella H Boynton; Kurt M Ribisl; Noel T Brewer
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2019-07-17

10.  Measurement Equivalence of the K6 Scale: The Effects of Race/Ethnicity and Language.

Authors:  Giyeon Kim; Jamie DeCoster; Ami N Bryant; Katy L Ford
Journal:  Assessment       Date:  2015-08-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.