Literature DB >> 20603521

NUAK1 links genomic instability and senescence.

David Bernard, Arnaud Augert.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20603521      PMCID: PMC2919246          DOI: 10.18632/aging.100153

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)        ISSN: 1945-4589            Impact factor:   5.682


× No keyword cloud information.

NUAK1 and senescence

The AMP-activated protein kinase-related kinase (ARK) family comprises 13 proteins, amongst them NUAK1, that can be classified into five subfamilies: AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), salt-induced kinase (SIK), microtubule-affinity-regulating kinase (MARK), brain specific kinase (BRSK), and SNF1-like kinase 1 (NUAK). These proteins regulate biological responses such as metabolism, polarity, cell proliferation or cell death, presumably in a sub-family specific manner [11]. Although the different proteins regulate different responses, their activities are thought to be controlled by the same kinase, LKB1 [2], which phosphorylates a threonine residue in the conserved T-loop of ARK proteins. AMPK proteins are phosphorylated and activated by LKB1 when ATP levels decrease, whereas ARK proteins are phosphorylated and activated independently of intracellular ATP levels [1]. During metabolic stress, ATP levels decrease and LKB1 activates AMPK that, in turn, phosphorylates a subset of proteins. P53 has been identified as one of these proteins, and it is postulated that the phosphorylation and activation of p53 by AMPK leads to cell cycle arrest and senescence [3]. We have recently identified and described the role of NUAK1 in the regulation of replicative senescence. Indeed, the constitutive expression of NUAK1 induces senescence in WI38 normal human fibroblasts whereas its knockdown extends their replicative lifespan. The loss of NUAK1 activation by LKB1 (by using a NUAK1 NUAK1 mutant unresponsive to LKB1 or by inhibiting LKB1 activity in NUAK1 expressing cells) results in a failure of NUAK1 to induce senescence, thus demonstrating the major role of LKB1 in NUAK1-induced senescence. Interestingly, our results support the existence of a p53 independent response, at least in WI38 cells, and emphasize a potential role of aneuploidy in NUAK1-dependent senescence [4].

Aneuploidy and senescence

Aneuploidy or genomic instability due to various factors have been reported to induce senescence [5, 6, 7]. Interestingly, senescent cells often display elevated aneuploidy, which suggests a putative functional role of aneuploidy in senescence. Nevertheless, it is unclear whether aneuploidy is involved in the establishment of the senescent phenotype and, if prevented, it can impair senescence, at least to some extent. A breakthrough has been achieved with the demonstration that the state of irreversible growth arrest in senescent cells may be due to elevated aneuploidy, putatively through a decrease of LATS1, a kinase involved in mitotic exit [7]. These results suggest that aneuploidy, if not directly involved in the establishment of senescence, can be required for irreversible growth arrest in senescent cells. Interestingly, aneuploidy was also observed during replicative senescence and during NUAK1-induced premature senescence in our model. More importantly, the replicative lifespan extension due to NUAK1 knockdown correlated with normal ploidy. Altogether, these results suggest that ploidy can be a functional regulator of the senescence program. We also identified LATS1 as a potential target of NUAK1 and a putative regulator of ploidy in NUAK1-dependent senescence. Altogether, these results suggest that aneuploidy could be part of the endogenous senescence program. Its mis-regulation could therefore induce premature senescence through a process that we chose to term "aneuploidy-induced senescence" (AIS). Our results also suggest that AIS may occur, at least in some settings, without the involvement of the p53 pathway. Interestingly, others have described that the overexpression of Aurora A, a serine threonine kinase tightly associated with the mitotic process, induces senescence in the mammary gland of p53-deficient mice [8]. Hence aneuploidy could be one of the signals triggering senescence and could act, in some settings, independently of p53.

Aneuploidy-induced senescence as a possible safeguard against tumor formation and development

Oncogene activation is one of the hallmarks of cancer cells and a driving force in tumorigenesis [9]. Oncogene-induced senescence (OIS) was described about a decade ago [10], and a long debate has raged about its relevance. With the development of adequate mouse models of cancer susceptibility and new tools to detect senescence in vivo, it has become possible do demonstrate its effectiveness in blocking malignant transformation [11]. Aneuploidy, another classical hallmark of cancer cells, is also believed to be involved in tumorigenesis [12]. As mentioned above, induction of aneuploidy can result in premature senescence in various settings [5, 6, 7]. Together, these observations suggest that AIS, like OIS, could constitute a failsafe mechanism against early tumorigenesis. To validate this hypothesis, it would be interesting to test the presence and the frequency of aneuploidy in benign lesions and to identify the genetic events possibly favoring AIS escape. The AIS model could resolve the apparent discrepancy about the role of NUAK1 in tumorigenesis. Our recent findings demonstrate an ability of NUAK1 to induce premature senescence in normal human cells whereas others, mainly the team of H. Esumi, have demonstrated a pro tumoral effect of NUAK1 through promoting cell growth and invasion [13, 14, 15]. However, these last conclusions were based on data obtained in cancer cell lines, in particular in colon cancer cell lines known to be highly aneuploid [16]. Thus, NUAK1 may have no additional effect on genomic stability and instead regulate other targets to confer a growth advantage to the cells. NUAK1 might even add more genomic instability, thus conferring additional growth and invasion advantages to these cancer cells.
  16 in total

Review 1.  The hallmarks of cancer.

Authors:  D Hanahan; R A Weinberg
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2000-01-07       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Mitogenic signalling and the p16INK4a-Rb pathway cooperate to enforce irreversible cellular senescence.

Authors:  Akiko Takahashi; Naoko Ohtani; Kimi Yamakoshi; Shin-ichi Iida; Hidetoshi Tahara; Keiko Nakayama; Keiichi I Nakayama; Toshinori Ide; Hideyuki Saya; Eiji Hara
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2006-10-08       Impact factor: 28.824

3.  AMP-activated protein kinase induces a p53-dependent metabolic checkpoint.

Authors:  Russell G Jones; David R Plas; Sara Kubek; Monica Buzzai; James Mu; Yang Xu; Morris J Birnbaum; Craig B Thompson
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2005-04-29       Impact factor: 17.970

4.  Oncogenic ras provokes premature cell senescence associated with accumulation of p53 and p16INK4a.

Authors:  M Serrano; A W Lin; M E McCurrach; D Beach; S W Lowe
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1997-03-07       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 5.  On the road to cancer: aneuploidy and the mitotic checkpoint.

Authors:  Geert J P L Kops; Beth A A Weaver; Don W Cleveland
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 60.716

6.  Genetic instability in colorectal cancers.

Authors:  C Lengauer; K W Kinzler; B Vogelstein
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-04-10       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Strong association of ARK5 with tumor invasion and metastasis.

Authors:  G Kusakai; A Suzuki; T Ogura; M Kaminishi; H Esumi
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2004-06

8.  Regulation of ploidy and senescence by the AMPK-related kinase NUAK1.

Authors:  Nicolas Humbert; Naveenan Navaratnam; Arnaud Augert; Marco Da Costa; Sébastien Martien; Jing Wang; Dolores Martinez; Corinne Abbadie; David Carling; Yvan de Launoit; Jesus Gil; David Bernard
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2009-11-19       Impact factor: 11.598

9.  BubR1 insufficiency causes early onset of aging-associated phenotypes and infertility in mice.

Authors:  Darren J Baker; Karthik B Jeganathan; J Douglas Cameron; Michael Thompson; Subhash Juneja; Alena Kopecka; Rajiv Kumar; Robert B Jenkins; Piet C de Groen; Patrick Roche; Jan M van Deursen
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2004-06-20       Impact factor: 38.330

10.  ARK5 expression in colorectal cancer and its implications for tumor progression.

Authors:  Gen-ichi Kusakai; Atsushi Suzuki; Tsutomu Ogura; Sin'ichi Miyamoto; Atsushi Ochiai; Michio Kaminishi; Hiroyasu Esumi
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.307

View more
  2 in total

1.  Role of Hepatic-Specific Transcription Factors and Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 during Induction of Fibroblasts to Hepatic Fate.

Authors:  Shima Rastegar-Pouyani; Niusha Khazaei; Ping Wee; Abdulshakour Mohammadnia; Moein Yaqubi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Genome-wide DNA methylation analysis reveals a potential mechanism for the pathogenesis and development of uterine leiomyomas.

Authors:  Ryo Maekawa; Shun Sato; Yoshiaki Yamagata; Hiromi Asada; Isao Tamura; Lifa Lee; Maki Okada; Hiroshi Tamura; Eiichi Takaki; Akira Nakai; Norihiro Sugino
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.