Literature DB >> 20602858

Choice cuts: parsing policymakers' pursuit of patient empowerment from an individual perspective.

Mark Schlesinger1.   

Abstract

In this commentary I explore several ways in which the psychology of individual decision-making shapes consumers' choices in medical settings and the potential for choice-based policies to improve the performance of the health care system. This analysis draws some crucial distinctions among the various pathways though which policymakers expect choice to improve outcomes and the various forms of support that might enhance patients' engagement with choice. I also consider how choice-promoting policies interact with other strategies for patient empowerment and depend crucially on the ways in which individual patients develop the capacity to make sense of their experiences with medical care. Drawing largely on data and studies from medical consumerism in the US, I identify a number of choice 'pathologies' that might compromise the influence or beneficial effects of choice-promoting initiatives. Though these limitations are unlikely to turn public officials away from their consumerist policy aspirations, identifying the realistic limitations of such initiatives makes clear the need to complement them with other strategies for enhancing patients' well being and encouraging a more responsive health care system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20602858     DOI: 10.1017/S174413311000006X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Econ Policy Law        ISSN: 1744-1331


  6 in total

1.  Complexity, public reporting, and choice of doctors: a look inside the blackest box of consumer behavior.

Authors:  Mark Schlesinger; David E Kanouse; Steven C Martino; Dale Shaller; Lise Rybowski
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2013-09-01       Impact factor: 3.929

2.  What Words Convey: The Potential for Patient Narratives to Inform Quality Improvement.

Authors:  Rachel Grob; Mark Schlesinger; Lacey Rose Barre; Naomi Bardach; Tara Lagu; Dale Shaller; Andrew M Parker; Steven C Martino; Melissa L Finucane; Jennifer L Cerully; Alina Palimaru
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 4.911

3.  Five questions for health economists.

Authors:  Randall P Ellis
Journal:  Int J Health Care Finance Econ       Date:  2012-09-04

4.  Patients' expectations of variation in quality of care relates to their search for comparative performance information.

Authors:  Nicole A B M Ketelaar; Marjan J Faber; Jozé C Braspenning; Gert P Westert
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  Comparative performance information plays no role in the referral behaviour of GPs.

Authors:  Nicole A B M Ketelaar; Marjan J Faber; Glyn Elwyn; Gert P Westert; Jozé C Braspenning
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 2.497

Review 6.  Using Patient-Reported Information to Improve Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Mark Schlesinger; Rachel Grob; Dale Shaller
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 3.402

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.