Sietske Corporaal1, Jan H Kleibeuker, Jan J Koornstra. 1. Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands. s.corporaal@mdl.umcg.nl
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: High volumes of polyethylene glycol (PEG)-based solutions as bowel preparation for colonoscopy are effective, but often poorly tolerated. To compare a 2 l PEG-based solution combined with ascorbic acid (PEG + Asc) with 4 l PEG-based solution (PEG). METHODS: In a single blind, quasi-randomized, prospective study, 350 patients undergoingcolonoscopy received 2 l of PEG + Asc or 4 l of PEG. For morning procedures, the total dose of PEG + Asc was taken the evening before, for afternoon colonoscopies, PEG + Asc was given as a split dose. The 4 l PEG preparation was given as a split dose. Efficacy of preparation was scored on a five-point scale in three different colon segments. Patients' experiences were evaluated using a questionnaire. RESULTS: From 307 patients (149 PEG + Asc, 158 PEG), results were available. Successful colon cleansing was achieved in 90.6% in the PEG + Asc group compared to 96% in the PEG group (not significant). In patients prepared with PEG + Asc, bowel cleansing was worse when patients underwent colonoscopy in the morning, compared to afternoon procedures. Side-effects and patients' experiences were similar in the PEG + Asc and PEG group. CONCLUSIONS:Low-volume PEG + ascorbic acid has comparable efficacy and tolerability as high-volume PEG solution. The cleansing results were worse if patients received the full dose PEG + Asc the evening before the procedure compared to the split dose. Our data support the administration of PEG + Asc as a split dose before the procedure.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: High volumes of polyethylene glycol (PEG)-based solutions as bowel preparation for colonoscopy are effective, but often poorly tolerated. To compare a 2 l PEG-based solution combined with ascorbic acid (PEG + Asc) with 4 l PEG-based solution (PEG). METHODS: In a single blind, quasi-randomized, prospective study, 350 patients undergoing colonoscopy received 2 l of PEG + Asc or 4 l of PEG. For morning procedures, the total dose of PEG + Asc was taken the evening before, for afternoon colonoscopies, PEG + Asc was given as a split dose. The 4 l PEG preparation was given as a split dose. Efficacy of preparation was scored on a five-point scale in three different colon segments. Patients' experiences were evaluated using a questionnaire. RESULTS: From 307 patients (149 PEG + Asc, 158 PEG), results were available. Successful colon cleansing was achieved in 90.6% in the PEG + Asc group compared to 96% in the PEG group (not significant). In patients prepared with PEG + Asc, bowel cleansing was worse when patients underwent colonoscopy in the morning, compared to afternoon procedures. Side-effects and patients' experiences were similar in the PEG + Asc and PEG group. CONCLUSIONS: Low-volume PEG + ascorbic acid has comparable efficacy and tolerability as high-volume PEG solution. The cleansing results were worse if patients received the full dose PEG + Asc the evening before the procedure compared to the split dose. Our data support the administration of PEG + Asc as a split dose before the procedure.
Authors: Fw Leung; Jo Harker; Jw Leung; Rm Siao-Salera; Sk Mann; Fc Ramirez; S Friedland; A Amato; F Radaelli; S Paggi; V Terruzzi; Yh Hsieh Journal: J Interv Gastroenterol Date: 2011-07-01
Authors: Vladimir Kojecky; Jan Matous; Radan Keil; Milan Dastych; Radek Kroupa; Zdena Zadorova; Michal Varga; Jiri Dolina; Milan Kment; Ales Hep Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2017-09-24 Impact factor: 2.571
Authors: Ala I Sharara; Ali H Harb; Fayez S Sarkis; Jean M Chalhoub; Rami Badreddine; Fadi H Mourad; Mahmoud Othman; Omar Masri Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2015-02-14 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Javier Romero-Vázquez; Federico Argüelles-Arias; Josefa Maria García-Montes; Ángel Caunedo-Álvarez; Francisco Javier Pellicer-Bautista; Juan Manuel Herrerías-Gutiérrez Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2014-06-21 Impact factor: 5.742