Literature DB >> 20602354

Antibodies as a model system for comparative model refinement.

Benjamin D Sellers1, Jerome P Nilmeier, Matthew P Jacobson.   

Abstract

Predicting the conformations of loops is a critical aspect of protein comparative (homology) modeling. Despite considerable advances in developing loop prediction algorithms, refining loops in homology models remains challenging. In this work, we use antibodies as a model system to investigate strategies for more robustly predicting loop conformations when the protein model contains errors in the conformations of side chains and protein backbone surrounding the loop in question. Specifically, our test system consists of partial models of antibodies in which the "scaffold" (i.e., the portion other than the complementarity determining region, CDR, loops) retains native backbone conformation, whereas the CDR loops are predicted using a combination of knowledge-based modeling (H1, H2, L1, L2, and L3) and ab initio loop prediction (H3). H3 is the most variable of the CDRs. Using a previously published method, a test set of 10 shorter H3 loops (5-7 residues) are predicted to an average backbone (N-C alpha-C-O) RMSD of 2.7 A while 11 longer loops (8-9 residues) are predicted to 5.1 A, thus recapitulating the difficulties in refining loops in models. By contrast, in control calculations predicting the same loops in crystal structures, the same method reconstructs the loops to an average of 0.5 and 1.4 A for the shorter and longer loops, respectively. We modify the loop prediction method to improve the ability to sample near-native loop conformations in the models, primarily by reducing the sensitivity of the sampling to the loop surroundings, and allowing the other CDR loops to optimize with the H3 loop. The new method improves the average accuracy significantly to 1.3 A RMSD and 3.1 A RMSD for the shorter and longer loops, respectively. Finally, we present results predicting 8-10 residue loops within complete comparative models of five nonantibody proteins. While anecdotal, these mixed, full-model results suggest our approach is a promising step toward more accurately predicting loops in homology models. Furthermore, while significant challenges remain, our method is a potentially useful tool for predicting antibody structures based on a known Fv scaffold. 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20602354      PMCID: PMC2998178          DOI: 10.1002/prot.22757

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  70 in total

1.  The Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  H M Berman; J Westbrook; Z Feng; G Gilliland; T N Bhat; H Weissig; I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  A hierarchical approach to all-atom protein loop prediction.

Authors:  Matthew P Jacobson; David L Pincus; Chaya S Rapp; Tyler J F Day; Barry Honig; David E Shaw; Richard A Friesner
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2004-05-01

3.  Structure of HOE/BAY 793 complexed to human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1) protease in two different crystal forms--structure/function relationship and influence of crystal packing.

Authors:  G Lange-Savage; H Berchtold; A Liesum; K H Budt; A Peyman; J Knolle; J Sedlacek; M Fabry; R Hilgenfeld
Journal:  Eur J Biochem       Date:  1997-09-01

4.  PIGS: automatic prediction of antibody structures.

Authors:  Paolo Marcatili; Alessandra Rosi; Anna Tramontano
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-07-19       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  Automated classification of antibody complementarity determining region 3 of the heavy chain (H3) loops into canonical forms and its application to protein structure prediction.

Authors:  B Oliva; P A Bates; E Querol; F X Avilés; M J Sternberg
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1998-06-26       Impact factor: 5.469

6.  Structural families in loops of homologous proteins: automatic classification, modelling and application to antibodies.

Authors:  A C Martin; J M Thornton
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1996-11-15       Impact factor: 5.469

7.  Mechanistic study of proton transfer and hysteresis in catalytic antibody 16E7 by site-directed mutagenesis and homology modeling.

Authors:  Lei Zheng; Roman Manetsch; Wolf-Dietrich Woggon; Ulrich Baumann; Jean-Louis Reymond
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2005-02-15       Impact factor: 3.641

8.  Crystal structure of the complex of a catalytic antibody Fab fragment with a transition state analog: structural similarities in esterase-like catalytic antibodies.

Authors:  J B Charbonnier; E Carpenter; B Gigant; B Golinelli-Pimpaneau; Z Eshhar; B S Green; M Knossow
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-12-05       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Crystal structure of monoclonal 6B5 Fab complexed with phencyclidine.

Authors:  K Lim; S M Owens; L Arnold; J C Sacchettini; D S Linthicum
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1998-10-30       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  Conformational changes in protein loops and helices induced by post-translational phosphorylation.

Authors:  Eli S Groban; Arjun Narayanan; Matthew P Jacobson
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2006-04-21       Impact factor: 4.475

View more
  8 in total

1.  IBC's 22nd Annual Antibody Engineering and 9th Annual Antibody Therapeutics International Conferences and the 2011 Annual Meeting of The Antibody Society, December 5-8, 2011, San Diego, CA.

Authors:  Johan Nilvebrant; D Cameron Dunlop; Aroop Sircar; Thierry Wurch; Emilia Falkowska; Janice M Reichert; Gustavo Helguera; Emily C Piccione; Simon Brack; Sven Berger
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 5.857

2.  Conformational sampling and structure prediction of multiple interacting loops in soluble and β-barrel membrane proteins using multi-loop distance-guided chain-growth Monte Carlo method.

Authors:  Ke Tang; Samuel W K Wong; Jun S Liu; Jinfeng Zhang; Jie Liang
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Blind prediction performance of RosettaAntibody 3.0: grafting, relaxation, kinematic loop modeling, and full CDR optimization.

Authors:  Brian D Weitzner; Daisuke Kuroda; Nicholas Marze; Jianqing Xu; Jeffrey J Gray
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2014-03-31

Review 4.  Computer-aided antibody design.

Authors:  Daisuke Kuroda; Hiroki Shirai; Matthew P Jacobson; Haruki Nakamura
Journal:  Protein Eng Des Sel       Date:  2012-06-02       Impact factor: 1.650

5.  OptMAVEn--a new framework for the de novo design of antibody variable region models targeting specific antigen epitopes.

Authors:  Tong Li; Robert J Pantazes; Costas D Maranas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-25       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Sphinx: merging knowledge-based and ab initio approaches to improve protein loop prediction.

Authors:  Claire Marks; Jaroslaw Nowak; Stefan Klostermann; Guy Georges; James Dunbar; Jiye Shi; Sebastian Kelm; Charlotte M Deane
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 6.937

7.  Homology modeling and molecular dynamics provide structural insights into tospovirus nucleoprotein.

Authors:  Rayane Nunes Lima; Muhammad Faheem; João Alexandre Ribeiro Gonçalves Barbosa; Marcelo Depólo Polêto; Hugo Verli; Fernando Lucas Melo; Renato Oliveira Resende
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Insights into evolutionary interaction patterns of the 'Phosphorylation Activation Segment' in kinase.

Authors:  Adil Ahiri; Hocine Garmes; Crtomir Podlipnik; Aziz Aboulmouhajir
Journal:  Bioinformation       Date:  2019-10-13
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.