Literature DB >> 20602112

Impact of body image on patients' attitude towards conventional, minimal invasive, and natural orifice surgery.

Wolfram Lamadé1, Colin Friedrich, Christoph Ulmer, Tarkan Basar, Heinz Weiss, Klaus-Peter Thon.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: A series of investigations proposed that patients' preference on minimal invasive and scarless surgery may be influenced by age, sex, and surgical as well as endoscopic history of the individual patient. However, it is unknown which psychological criteria lead to the acceptance of increased personal surgical risk or increased personal expenses in patients demanding scarless operations. We investigated whether individual body image contributes to the patient's readiness to assume higher risk in favor of potentially increased cosmesis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a nonrandomized survey among 63 consecutive surgical patients after receiving surgery. Individual body image perception was assessed postoperatively applying the FKB-20 questionnaire extended by four additional items. The FKB-20 questionnaire is a validated tool for measuring body image disturbances resulting in a two-dimensional score with negative body image (NBI) and vital body dynamics (VBD) being the two resulting scores. A subgroup analysis was performed according to the conducted operations: conventional open surgery = group 1, traditional laparoscopic surgery = group 2, and no scar surgery = group 3.
RESULTS: There was a significant correlation between a negative body image and the preference for scar sparing and scarless surgery indicated by a significantly increased acceptance of surgical risks and the willingness to spend additional money for receiving scarless surgery (r = 0.333; p = 0.0227). Allocated to operation subgroups, 17 of 63 patients belonged to group 1 (OS), 29 to group 2 (minimally invasive surgery), and 17 patients to group 3 (no scar). Although age and sex were unequally distributed, the groups were homogenous regarding body mass index and body image (NBI). Subgroup analysis revealed that postoperative desire for scar sparing approaches was most frequently expressed by patients who received no scar operations.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with an NBI tend towards scarless surgery and are willing to accept increased operative risk and to spend additional money for improved postoperative cosmesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20602112     DOI: 10.1007/s00423-010-0669-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg        ISSN: 1435-2443            Impact factor:   3.445


  17 in total

1.  Trilumenal hybrid-NOS proctocolectomy.

Authors:  Wolfram Lamadé; Christoph Ulmer; Jürgen Hochberger; Kai Matthes; Colin Friedrich; Klaus Peter Thon
Journal:  Surg Innov       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.058

2.  Risk factors for conversion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy to open cholecystectomy.

Authors:  C Simopoulos; S Botaitis; A Polychronidis; G Tripsianis; A J Karayiannakis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-05-04       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Transgastric surgery in the abdomen: the dawn of a new era?

Authors:  Juergen Hochberger; Wolfram Lamadé
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 9.427

4.  Surgeon perceptions of Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES).

Authors:  Eric T Volckmann; Eric S Hungness; Nathaniel J Soper; Lee L Swanstrom
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-06-02       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  [Validation of the FKB-20 as scale for the detection of body image distortions in psychosomatic patients].

Authors:  U Clement; B Löwe
Journal:  Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol       Date:  1996-07

6.  Triluminal hybrid NOS as a novel approach for colonic resection with colorectal anastomosis.

Authors:  Wolfram Lamadé; Juergen Hochberger; Christoph Ulmer; Kai Matthes; Klaus Peter Thon
Journal:  Surg Innov       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.058

7.  Risk factors for conversion to open surgery in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Salleh Ibrahim; Tay Khoon Hean; Lim Swee Ho; T Ravintharan; Tan Ngian Chye; Chng Hong Chee
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Women's positive perception of transvaginal NOTES surgery.

Authors:  Carrie Y Peterson; Sonia Ramamoorthy; Barbara Andrews; Santiago Horgan; Mark Talamini; Alana Chock
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-12-05       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Patient attitudes and expectations regarding natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Lee L Swanstrom; Eric Volckmann; Eric Hungness; Nathaniel J Soper
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-04-03       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Cosmetic issues of abdominal surgery: results of an enquiry into possible grounds for a natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) approach.

Authors:  M E Hagen; O J Wagner; D Christen; P Morel
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 10.093

View more
  8 in total

1.  Innovations in Endosurgery-Journey into the Past of the Future: To Ride the SILS Bandwagon or Not?

Authors:  Brij B Agarwal; Kamran Ali; Karan Goyal; Krishan C Mahajan
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 0.656

2.  Prospective assessment of trocar-specific morbidity in laparoscopy.

Authors:  Alessandra Cristaudi; Marie-Laure Matthey-Gié; Nicolas Demartines; Dimitri Christoforidis
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Single-port cholecystectomy versus multi-port cholecystectomy: a prospective cohort study with 222 patients.

Authors:  Markus J Wagner; Hans Kern; Alexander Hapfelmeier; Jan Mehler; Michael H Schoenberg
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Transoral endoscopic mediastinal surgery (TOEMS)-results of a first clinical study for scarless mediastinal lymph node biopsies.

Authors:  Wolfram Klemm; Steffen Frese; Gunda Leschber; André Nemat; Thomas Wilhelm
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  Conventional laparoscopy vs. single port surgery from a patient's point of view: influence of demographics and body mass index.

Authors:  Bernhard Dauser; Achim Görgei; Johannes Stopfer; Friedrich Herbst
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 1.704

6.  Single-incision and NOTES cholecystectomy, are there clinical or cosmetic advantages when compared to conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy? A case-control study comparing single-incision, transvaginal, and conventional laparoscopic technique for cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Peter B van den Boezem; Simone Velthuis; Harm J Lourens; Miguel A Cuesta; Colin Sietses
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Scars Matter: The Importance of Incision Decisions in Bariatric Patients.

Authors:  Andres Narvaez C; Camila Ortega; Gerardo Davalos; L Kasey Welsh; Ramon Diaz Jara; Juan Esteban Perez; Jana Chtchetinin; Hui-Jie Lee; Nicole Garzon; Kelli Friedman; Kunoor Jain-Spangler; Dana Portenier; Alfredo D Guerron
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 4.129

8.  Feasibility and safety of robotic-assisted total pancreatectomy: a pilot western series.

Authors:  Emanuele F Kauffmann; Niccolò Napoli; Valerio Genovese; Michael Ginesini; Cesare Gianfaldoni; Fabio Vistoli; Gabriella Amorese; Ugo Boggi
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2021-05-19
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.