Literature DB >> 2060192

Legal liability for injury to research subjects.

K C Glass1, B Freedman.   

Abstract

In Weiss vs Solomon, the heirs of a subject who died while a volunteer in a nontherapeutic study successfully sued the investigator and his university-affiliated hospital. Without referring to any 'standard of practice', including the MRC Guidelines, the judge found the principal investigator and the hospital (for its research ethics committee) equivalently responsible for not disclosing a rare but fatal complication caused by fluorescein dye and not adequately screening the subject, who suffered from undisclosed hypertropic cardiomyopathy. From the point of view of research institutions, members of research committees, and the investigators themselves, the judgement has left serious uncertainty and ambiguity concerning their responsibilities for subject selection and safety, and disclosure for the purposes of informed consent.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Legal Approach; Medical Research Council of Canada; Weiss v. Solomon

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2060192

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Invest Med        ISSN: 0147-958X            Impact factor:   0.825


  1 in total

1.  When a serious adverse event in research occurs, how do other volunteers react?

Authors:  Caitlin E Kennedy; Nancy Kass; Rachel K Myers; Edward J Fuchs; Charles Flexner
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.742

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.