Literature DB >> 20601918

Revision stapedotomy: operative findings and hearing results. A prospective study of 652 cases from the Otology-Neurotology Database.

Robert Vincent1, Maroeska Rovers, Narayan Zingade, John Oates, Neil Sperling, Arnaud Devèze, Wilko Grolman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify the causes of failure of primary stapes surgery and to evaluate the hearing results of revision stapes surgery in a consecutive series of 652 cases. STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective nonrandomized clinical study.
SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Six hundred thirty-four patients who underwent 652 consecutive revision stapes operations from April 1992 to December 2007 were enrolled in this study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Preoperative and postoperative audiometric evaluation using conventional audiometry, namely, air-bone gap (ABG), bone-conduction thresholds, and air-conduction thresholds, were assessed. Postoperative audiometry was performed at 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months and then annually for 15 years.
RESULTS: The most frequently identified reason for primary surgery failure was incus erosion (27.6%) and prosthesis displacement (18.2%). The postoperative ABG was closed to 10 dB or less and 20 dB or less in 63.4 and 74.6% of cases, respectively. The mean 4-frequency postoperative ABG was 11.5 dB as compared with 28 dB preoperatively (mean difference, 16.5 dB; 95% confidence interval [CI], 15.1-17.9 dB, p < 0.0001). The mean 4-frequency postoperative air-conduction thresholds were 45.7 dB compared with 58.7 dB preoperatively (mean difference, 13 dB; 95% CI, 11.4-14.6 dB, p < 0.0001). The mean 4-frequency postoperative bone-conduction thresholds were 34 dB compared with 30.6 dB preoperatively (mean difference, -3.5 dB; 95% CI, -4.4 to -2.5 dB, p < 0.0001). A significant postoperative sensorineural hearing loss (>15 dB) was observed in 2.9% of cases in this series.
CONCLUSION: Improvement of a conductive hearing loss after initial unsuccessful primary or revision stapes surgery can be accomplished with further revision but is occasionally modest.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20601918     DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181e8f1da

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  8 in total

1.  Predictable prosthesis length on a high-resolution CT scan before a stapedotomy.

Authors:  Emilie Gosselin; Ahlem Elblidi; Salman F Alhabib; Marc-Elie Nader; George Wanna; Issam Saliba
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Stapedotomy and its effect on hearing - our experience with 54 cases.

Authors:  Taiwo Olugbemiga Adedeji; Shabbir Indorewala; Abuzar Indorewala; Gaurav Nemade
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 0.927

3.  KTP laser stapedotomy with a self-crimping, thermal shape memory Nitinol piston: follow-up study reporting intermediate-term hearing.

Authors:  Imre Gerlinger; Péter Bakó; Zalán Piski; Péter Révész; Gábor Ráth; Tamás Karosi; László Lujber
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  CO2 laser stapedotomy safety: influence of laser energy and time on bone-conduction hearing levels.

Authors:  Uwe Schönfeld; Hu Weiming; Veit M Hofmann; Sergije Jovanovic; Andreas E Albers
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Endoscopic stapedotomy: safety and audiological results in 150 patients.

Authors:  Luca Bianconi; Luca Gazzini; Elisa Laura; Stefano De Rossi; Alessandro Conti; Daniele Marchioni
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  An "Uncrimped" SMart Stapes Prosthesis: A Cause of Late Hearing Deterioration in Otosclerosis.

Authors:  Premjit S Randhawa; Nicholas Hamilton; Antony A Narula
Journal:  Case Rep Med       Date:  2012-01-31

7.  The Relationship between Stapes Prosthesis Length and Rate of Stapedectomy Success.

Authors:  Cinzia L Marchica; Issam Saliba
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Ear Nose Throat       Date:  2015-06-24

8.  Revision Stapes Surgery in a Tertiary Referral Center: Surgical and Audiometric Outcomes.

Authors:  Esther E Blijleven; Inge Wegner; Rinze A Tange; Hans G X M Thomeer
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2019-06-04       Impact factor: 1.547

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.