PURPOSE: Inhibition of the antiapoptotic BCL2 family is one of the most promising areas of anticancer drug development. However, ABT-737, a specific BCL2 inhibitor, is neither orally bioavailable nor metabolically stable. To overcome these problems, the structurally related molecule ABT-263 was synthesized and recently entered clinical trials in hematologic malignancies, including chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Almost all laboratory studies have been carried out with ABT-737 rather than ABT-263, the drug being used in clinical trials. Currently there are no published data on the comparative effects of these inhibitors. To gain insight into the potential value or limitations of ABT-263 in the clinic, we assessed its ability to induce apoptosis in clinically relevant cellular models of CLL. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: The susceptibility of freshly isolated primary CLL cells to these inhibitors was compared in standard culture conditions and in conditions that more closely mimic in vivo conditions in a whole blood assay system. RESULTS: ABT-737 was more potent than ABT-263 at inducing apoptosis in CLL cells. In whole blood, approximately 100-fold higher concentrations of both drugs were required to induce apoptosis. We found that ABT-263 was highly bound by albumin and that an increased albumin binding of ABT-263 as compared with ABT-737 accounted for the differential sensitivity of CLL cells. CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that the exquisite in vitro sensitivity of CLL cells to BCL2 inhibitors may be lost in vivo due to high cell densities and the albumin binding of ABT-263. Modification of ABT-263 may yield a BCL2 inhibitor with greater bioavailability and more favorable pharmacokinetics.
PURPOSE: Inhibition of the antiapoptotic BCL2 family is one of the most promising areas of anticancer drug development. However, ABT-737, a specific BCL2 inhibitor, is neither orally bioavailable nor metabolically stable. To overcome these problems, the structurally related molecule ABT-263 was synthesized and recently entered clinical trials in hematologic malignancies, including chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Almost all laboratory studies have been carried out with ABT-737 rather than ABT-263, the drug being used in clinical trials. Currently there are no published data on the comparative effects of these inhibitors. To gain insight into the potential value or limitations of ABT-263 in the clinic, we assessed its ability to induce apoptosis in clinically relevant cellular models of CLL. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: The susceptibility of freshly isolated primary CLL cells to these inhibitors was compared in standard culture conditions and in conditions that more closely mimic in vivo conditions in a whole blood assay system. RESULTS:ABT-737 was more potent than ABT-263 at inducing apoptosis in CLL cells. In whole blood, approximately 100-fold higher concentrations of both drugs were required to induce apoptosis. We found that ABT-263 was highly bound by albumin and that an increased albumin binding of ABT-263 as compared with ABT-737 accounted for the differential sensitivity of CLL cells. CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that the exquisite in vitro sensitivity of CLL cells to BCL2 inhibitors may be lost in vivo due to high cell densities and the albumin binding of ABT-263. Modification of ABT-263 may yield a BCL2 inhibitor with greater bioavailability and more favorable pharmacokinetics.
Authors: K D Mason; S L Khaw; K C Rayeroux; E Chew; E F Lee; W D Fairlie; A P Grigg; J F Seymour; J Szer; D C S Huang; A W Roberts Journal: Leukemia Date: 2009-07-30 Impact factor: 11.528
Authors: M Sattler; H Liang; D Nettesheim; R P Meadows; J E Harlan; M Eberstadt; H S Yoon; S B Shuker; B S Chang; A J Minn; C B Thompson; S W Fesik Journal: Science Date: 1997-02-14 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Tomomi Kuwana; Mason R Mackey; Guy Perkins; Mark H Ellisman; Martin Latterich; Roger Schneiter; Douglas R Green; Donald D Newmeyer Journal: Cell Date: 2002-11-01 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: M Vogler; K Weber; D Dinsdale; I Schmitz; K Schulze-Osthoff; M J S Dyer; G M Cohen Journal: Cell Death Differ Date: 2009-04-24 Impact factor: 15.828
Authors: Andrew W Roberts; John F Seymour; Jennifer R Brown; William G Wierda; Thomas J Kipps; Seong Lin Khaw; Dennis A Carney; Simon Z He; David C S Huang; Hao Xiong; Yue Cui; Todd A Busman; Evelyn M McKeegan; Andrew P Krivoshik; Sari H Enschede; Rod Humerickhouse Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2011-12-19 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Rongqing Pan; Leah J Hogdal; Juliana M Benito; Donna Bucci; Lina Han; Gautam Borthakur; Jorge Cortes; Daniel J DeAngelo; Lakeisha Debose; Hong Mu; Hartmut Döhner; Verena I Gaidzik; Ilene Galinsky; Leonard S Golfman; Torsten Haferlach; Karine G Harutyunyan; Jianhua Hu; Joel D Leverson; Guido Marcucci; Markus Müschen; Rachel Newman; Eugene Park; Peter P Ruvolo; Vivian Ruvolo; Jeremy Ryan; Sonja Schindela; Patrick Zweidler-McKay; Richard M Stone; Hagop Kantarjian; Michael Andreeff; Marina Konopleva; Anthony G Letai Journal: Cancer Discov Date: 2013-12-17 Impact factor: 39.397
Authors: Beata Holkova; Jeffrey G Supko; Matthew M Ames; Joel M Reid; Geoffrey I Shapiro; Edward Brent Perkins; Viswanathan Ramakrishnan; Mary Beth Tombes; Connie Honeycutt; Renee M McGovern; Maciej Kmieciak; Ellen Shrader; Martha D Wellons; Heidi Sankala; Austin Doyle; John Wright; John D Roberts; Steven Grant Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2013-03-20 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: B Kim; S Wang; J M Lee; Y Jeong; T Ahn; D-S Son; H W Park; H-s Yoo; Y-J Song; E Lee; Y M Oh; S B Lee; J Choi; J C Murray; Y Zhou; P H Song; K-A Kim; L M Weiner Journal: Oncogene Date: 2014-03-24 Impact factor: 9.867