AIMS: Stair climbing is an activity that can easily be integrated into everyday life and has positive health effects. Point-of-choice prompts are informational or motivational signs near stairs and elevators/escalators aimed at increased stair climbing. The aim of this review was to assess the effectiveness of point-of-choice prompts for the promotion of stair climbing. METHODS: In a systematic search of the literature, studies that assessed the effectiveness of point-of-choice prompts to increase the rate of stair climbing in the general population were identified. No restrictions were made regarding the setting, the duration of the intervention, or the kind of message. RESULTS: A total of 25 studies were identified. Point-of-choice prompts were predominantly posters or stair-riser banners in public traffic stations, shopping malls or office buildings. The 25 studies reported 42 results. Of 10 results for elevator settings, only three reported a significant increase in stair climbing, whereas 28 of 32 results for escalator settings reported a significant increase in stair climbing. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, point-of-choice prompts are able to increase the rate of stair climbing, especially in escalator settings. In elevator settings, point-of-choice prompts seem less effective. The long-term efficacy and the most efficient message format have yet to be determined in methodologically rigorous studies.
AIMS: Stair climbing is an activity that can easily be integrated into everyday life and has positive health effects. Point-of-choice prompts are informational or motivational signs near stairs and elevators/escalators aimed at increased stair climbing. The aim of this review was to assess the effectiveness of point-of-choice prompts for the promotion of stair climbing. METHODS: In a systematic search of the literature, studies that assessed the effectiveness of point-of-choice prompts to increase the rate of stair climbing in the general population were identified. No restrictions were made regarding the setting, the duration of the intervention, or the kind of message. RESULTS: A total of 25 studies were identified. Point-of-choice prompts were predominantly posters or stair-riser banners in public traffic stations, shopping malls or office buildings. The 25 studies reported 42 results. Of 10 results for elevator settings, only three reported a significant increase in stair climbing, whereas 28 of 32 results for escalator settings reported a significant increase in stair climbing. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, point-of-choice prompts are able to increase the rate of stair climbing, especially in escalator settings. In elevator settings, point-of-choice prompts seem less effective. The long-term efficacy and the most efficient message format have yet to be determined in methodologically rigorous studies.
Authors: John Bellettiere; Ben Nguyen; Sandy Liles; Vincent Berardi; Marc A Adams; Paddy Dempsey; Yael Benporat; Jacqueline Kerr; Andrea Z LaCroix; Melbourne Hovell Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2019-07-16 Impact factor: 3.046
Authors: Gregory W Heath; Diana C Parra; Olga L Sarmiento; Lars Bo Andersen; Neville Owen; Shifalika Goenka; Felipe Montes; Ross C Brownson Journal: Lancet Date: 2012-07-21 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Deborah A Cohen; Bing Han; Kathryn Pitkin Derose; Stephanie Williamson; Terry Marsh; Thomas L McKenzie Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2013-11 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Anna C Whittaker; Frank F Eves; Douglas Carroll; Tessa J Roseboom; Annie T Ginty; Rebecca C Painter; Susanne R de Rooij Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2021-05-14 Impact factor: 4.135
Authors: Robert Alan Sloan; Benjamin Adam Haaland; Carol Leung; Falk Müller-Riemenschneider Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2013-01-07 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Falk Müller-Riemenschneider; Marc Nocon; Thomas Reinhold; Stefan N Willich Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2010-08-04 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Johannes A N Dorresteijn; Yolanda van der Graaf; Kailiang Zheng; Wilko Spiering; Frank L J Visseren Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2013-01-24 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Jeri Brittin; Dina Sorensen; Matthew Trowbridge; Karen K Lee; Dieter Breithecker; Leah Frerichs; Terry Huang Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-07-31 Impact factor: 3.240