Literature DB >> 20601151

Long-term outcomes and clinical predictors for pacemaker-requiring bradyarrhythmias after cardiac transplantation: analysis of the UNOS/OPTN cardiac transplant database.

Daniel J Cantillon1, Khaldoun G Tarakji, Tingfei Hu, Amy Hsu, Nicholas G Smedira, Randall C Starling, Bruce L Wilkoff, Walid I Saliba.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pacemaker-requiring bradyarrhythmias after cardiac transplantation are common, and rarely can lead to sudden cardiac death. Prior outcomes studies have been limited to single-center data.
OBJECTIVE: This study sought to define the long-term outcomes and clinical predictors for pacemaker-requiring bradyarrhythmias in the cardiac transplant population.
METHODS: This study used multivariable analysis of the United Network for Organ Sharing/Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (UNOS/OPTN) database of sequential U.S. cardiac transplant recipients from 1997 to 2007 stratified by postoperative bradyarrhythmias requiring a pacemaker. The primary end point was all-cause mortality.
RESULTS: Among 35,987 cardiac transplant recipients (age 46.1 ± 18.3 years, 76% male, 22% bicaval technique) with a follow-up of 6.3 ± 4.7 years, pacemaker-requiring bradyarrhythmias occurred in 3,940 patients (10.9%). Pacemaker recipients demonstrated improved survival (median 8.0 years vs. 5.2 years, P < .001), decreased 5-year mortality (13.8% vs. 17.7%, P < .001), and overall crude mortality (42.9% vs. 45.9%, P < .001). Multivariable propensity-score-adjusted analysis demonstrated improved survival among pacemaker recipients (adjusted hazard ratio 0.84, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.80 to 0.88, P < .001) after adjustment for donor/recipient age, UNOS listing status, donor heart ischemic time, surgical technique, graft rejection, and other common comorbidities. The bicaval surgical technique was strongly protective against a postoperative pacemaker requirement (odds ratio [OR] 0.33, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.36, P < .001) in multivariable analysis. Among the other variables studied, only increasing donor age (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.09, P < .001) and recipient age (OR 1.09, 95% CI 1.0 to 1.12, P < .001) were associated with a permanent pacemaker requirement.
CONCLUSION: Cardiac transplant recipients with pacemaker-requiring bradyarrhythmias have an excellent long-term prognosis. Increased mortality in the nonpacemaker group merits further investigation. Biatrial surgical technique and increasing donor/recipient age are associated with postoperative pacemaker requirement.
Copyright © 2010 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20601151     DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2010.06.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Rhythm        ISSN: 1547-5271            Impact factor:   6.343


  9 in total

1.  A Young Woman with Someone Else's Heart.

Authors:  George Waits; Ju Kim
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2020 Jan-Mar

2.  Pacemaker Use Following Heart Transplantation.

Authors:  Hari R Mallidi; Michael Bates
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2017

3.  Permanent pacing in a very long-term follow-up after orthotopic heart transplantation: A matter of when or why?

Authors:  Emyal Alyaydin; Christian Pogoda; Angelo Dell'Aquila; Gerrit Frommeyer; Juergen R Sindermann; Holger Reinecke; Izabela Tuleta
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 1.485

4.  Arrhythmias in the Heart Transplant Patient.

Authors:  David Hamon; Jane Taleski; Marmar Vaseghi; Kalyanam Shivkumar; Noel G Boyle
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2014-11-29

5.  Risk factors and survival of patients with permanent pacemaker implantation after heart transplantation.

Authors:  Rasmus Rivinius; Matthias Helmschrott; Ann-Kathrin Rahm; Fabrice F Darche; Dierk Thomas; Tom Bruckner; Andreas O Doesch; Philipp Ehlermann; Hugo A Katus; Edgar Zitron
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  Transvenous Extraction and Removal of Pacing Leads Placed after Cardiac Transplantation.

Authors:  Caleb Norton; Benjamin Holmes; Asad Al Aboud; Eun-Jeong Kim; Holly Gonzales; Christopher Ellis; Roy John; George H Crossley; Jay Montgomery
Journal:  Case Rep Cardiol       Date:  2019-01-03

7.  Cardiac allograft vasculopathy and donor age affecting permanent pacemaker implantation after heart transplantation.

Authors:  Stefan Roest; Olivier C Manintveld; Marit A E Kolff; Ferdi Akca; Jesse F Veenis; Alina A Constantinescu; Jasper J Brugts; Ozcan Birim; Lennie M van Osch-Gevers; Tamas Szili-Torok; Kadir Caliskan
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2022-02-17

8.  Arrhythmias after heart transplantation: mechanisms and management.

Authors:  Anees Thajudeen; Eric C Stecker; Michael Shehata; Jignesh Patel; Xunzhang Wang; John H McAnulty; Jon Kobashigawa; Sumeet S Chugh
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 5.501

Review 9.  A Meta-Analysis on Prophylactic Donor Heart Tricuspid Annuloplasty in Orthotopic Heart Transplantation: High Hopes from a Small Intervention.

Authors:  Alberto Emanuel Bacusca; Andrei Tarus; Alexandru Burlacu; Mihail Enache; Grigore Tinica
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-10
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.