Literature DB >> 20600707

Variability of biomarkers in volunteer studies: The biological component.

Suzanne Spaan1, Wouter Fransman, Nick Warren, Richard Cotton, John Cocker, Erik Tielemans.   

Abstract

Biological monitoring has become one of the methods to measure exposure, with the advantage that it gives information about the concentration of a substance that actually enters the body and reflects the inter-individual differences in uptake and metabolic variation. However, limited information is available on inter- and intra-individual variability of biomarkers. The aim of this study was to gather information about the biological component of inter-individual variation in biomarkers using results from volunteer studies. Open literature and other (internal) sources were searched to find human volunteer studies utilizing biological monitoring. Ultimately 41 studies were included in our analysis, with a total of 6747 observations for one or more biomarkers from 223 volunteers. The data from these studies were grouped on the basis of study, substance under investigation, exposure route, biological matrix, exposure duration, dose and number of exposure events to obtain 278 homogeneous groups (strata) for statistical analysis. Variability was assessed in two ways. Firstly, estimates of biomarker half-life were calculated for each individual, thereby allowing the estimation of inter-individual variability in half-lives within the homogeneous groups. Secondly, variation in biomarker concentrations at a given time point was estimated. For estimated half-lives the GSDs ranged from 1.0 to 6.8. The variability in estimated half-lives did not differ much for the different types of substances. For concentrations at a given time point the average GSDs within strata ranged from 1.0 to 5.6. Again, variability did not differ much for different groups (e.g., type of substance). The median variability component was 0.11 (range 0-3.0). In conclusion, volunteer studies enable the estimation of both variation in half-lives and variation in biomarker levels in the well-defined homogeneous groups. Comparison of our results with other studies indicates that variation due to biological differences within and between people is quite substantial in homogeneous exposure groups. The relative contribution of this biological component to the total variation will be smaller when variance components are estimated in less homogeneous groups, such as those in occupational and environmental settings. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20600707     DOI: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2010.06.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Lett        ISSN: 0378-4274            Impact factor:   4.372


  2 in total

1.  Evaluation of occupational exposure: comparison of biological and environmental variabilities using physiologically based toxicokinetic modeling.

Authors:  G Truchon; R Tardif; G Charest-Tardif; A de Batz; P O Droz
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 3.015

2.  How Many Urine Samples Are Needed to Accurately Assess Exposure to Non-Persistent Chemicals? The Biomarker Reliability Assessment Tool (BRAT) for Scientists, Research Sponsors, and Risk Managers.

Authors:  Marc-André Verner; Hassan Salame; Conrad Housand; Linda S Birnbaum; Maryse F Bouchard; Jonathan Chevrier; Lesa L Aylward; Daniel Q Naiman; Judy S LaKind
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-12-06       Impact factor: 3.390

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.