Literature DB >> 20600645

Conditioned turning behavior: a Pavlovian fear response expressed during the post-encounter period following aversive stimulation.

J W Tarpley1, I G Shlifer, L R Halladay, H T Blair.   

Abstract

Rats were trained to fear an auditory conditioned stimulus (CS) by pairing it with a mild electric shock (the unconditioned stimulus, or US) delivered to one eyelid. After training, the CS elicited two different conditioned fear responses from rats: a passive freezing response, and an active turning response. The balance between these two modes of conditioned responding depended upon the rat's recent history of encounters with the US. If rats had not recently encountered the US, then they responded to the CS by freezing. But after recently encountering the US, rats exhibited CS-evoked turning responses that were always directed away from the trained eyelid, even if the US had recently been delivered to the opposite (untrained) eyelid. This post-encounter turning behavior was not observed in rats that had been trained with unpaired presentations of the CS and US, indicating that even though CS-evoked turning was selectively expressed after recent encounters with the US, it was nonetheless a conditioned Pavlovian fear response that depended upon a learned association between the CS and US. Further supporting this conclusion, pharmacological inactivation experiments showed that expression of both freezing and turning behaviors depended upon lateralized circuits in the amygdala and periaqueductal gray (PAG) that are known to support expression of Pavlovian fear responses. These findings indicate that even though the ability of a CS to elicit Pavlovian fear responses depend upon the long-term history of CS-US pairings, the mode of conditioned responding (freezing versus turning in the present experiments) can be modulated by short-term factors, such as the recent history of US encounters. We discuss neural mechanisms that might mediate such short-term transitions between different modes of defensive responding, and consider how dysregulation of such mechanisms might contribute to clinical anxiety disorders. (c) 2010 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20600645      PMCID: PMC2966824          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2010.06.046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroscience        ISSN: 0306-4522            Impact factor:   3.590


  65 in total

Review 1.  Parallel circuits mediating distinct emotional coping reactions to different types of stress.

Authors:  K A Keay; R Bandler
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 8.989

Review 2.  Opposing roles of the amygdala and dorsolateral periaqueductal gray in fear-potentiated startle.

Authors:  D L Walker; J V Cassella; Y Lee; T C De Lima; M Davis
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 8.989

Review 3.  Establishing an agenda for translational research on PTSD.

Authors:  Melinda M Miller; Bruce S McEwen
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.691

Review 4.  Functional characteristics of the midbrain periaqueductal gray.

Authors:  M M Behbehani
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 11.685

5.  Effects of amygdala, hippocampus, and periaqueductal gray lesions on short- and long-term contextual fear.

Authors:  J J Kim; R A Rison; M S Fanselow
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 1.912

6.  Distinct regions of the periaqueductal gray are involved in the acquisition and expression of defensive responses.

Authors:  B M De Oca; J P DeCola; S Maren; M S Fanselow
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-05-01       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  When fear is near: threat imminence elicits prefrontal-periaqueductal gray shifts in humans.

Authors:  Dean Mobbs; Predrag Petrovic; Jennifer L Marchant; Demis Hassabis; Nikolaus Weiskopf; Ben Seymour; Raymond J Dolan; Christopher D Frith
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-08-24       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Neural correlates of competing fear behaviors evoked by an innately aversive stimulus.

Authors:  Raymond Mongeau; Gabriel A Miller; Elizabeth Chiang; David J Anderson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-05-01       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Hemispheric lateralization of pain processing by amygdala neurons.

Authors:  Guangchen Ji; Volker Neugebauer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-07-22       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Influence of long-term sensitization on long-term habituation of the acoustic startle response in rats: central gray lesions, preexposure, and extinction.

Authors:  G S Borszcz; J Cranney; R N Leaton
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1989-01
View more
  2 in total

1.  Distinct ensembles of medial prefrontal cortex neurons are activated by threatening stimuli that elicit excitation vs. inhibition of movement.

Authors:  Lindsay R Halladay; Hugh T Blair
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Prefrontal infralimbic cortex mediates competition between excitation and inhibition of body movements during pavlovian fear conditioning.

Authors:  Lindsay R Halladay; Hugh T Blair
Journal:  J Neurosci Res       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 4.164

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.