Literature DB >> 20600455

Evaluation of concentration-response options for diacetyl in support of occupational risk assessment.

Andrew Maier1, Melissa Kohrman-Vincent, Ann Parker, Lynne T Haber.   

Abstract

The current emphasis on occupational exposures to diacetyl has led to new research on its effects. We evaluated whether the data are sufficient to support a transition from a hazard-based risk management approach to a quantitative occupational risk assessment approach, characterized by developing a health-based occupational exposure limit (OEL). Inhalation health effects data were evaluated and issues and uncertainties related to occupational risk assessment needs were identified. A systematic hazard characterization, supported by both the toxicology and epidemiology literature, showed that the respiratory tract effects of diacetyl are the primary end points of relevance for developing an OEL. In an effort to provide a systematic approach for the analysis of the issues that need to be considered in developing an occupational risk assessment for diacetyl, a potential OEL was derived. A concentration-response assessment was completed using tracheobronchial effects in mice as the critical effect. The resulting benchmark concentration (lower bound estimate or BMCL) was adjusted to a human equivalent concentration of 1.8 ppm. A composite uncertainty factor of 10 was recommended to account for extrapolation from an adjusted BMCL from an animal study and for human variability in sensitivity and taking into account other uncertainties in the overall database. The resulting OEL recommendation of 0.2 ppm as a time-weighted average (TWA) was supported by the current occupational epidemiology literature. This evaluation showed that a health-based OEL value can be derived for diacetyl with moderate to high confidence.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20600455     DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2010.06.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol        ISSN: 0273-2300            Impact factor:   3.271


  6 in total

1.  Safe exposure level for diacetyl.

Authors:  Kendal B Wallace; Gilman D Veith
Journal:  Int J Occup Environ Health       Date:  2014 Jan-Mar

2.  Pulmonary Impairment and Risk Assessment in a Diacetyl-Exposed Population: Microwave Popcorn Workers.

Authors:  Robert M Park; Stephen J Gilbert
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.162

Review 3.  Occupational causes of constrictive bronchiolitis.

Authors:  Kathleen Kreiss
Journal:  Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2013-04

4.  Impacts of risk assessment data, assumptions, and methods: Considering the evidence for diacetyl and 2,3-pentanedione.

Authors:  Douglas O Johns; Christine Whittaker; Jean M Cox-Ganser
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-09-08

5.  Naturally occurring diacetyl and 2,3-pentanedione concentrations associated with roasting and grinding unflavored coffee beans in a commercial setting.

Authors:  Shannon H Gaffney; Anders Abelmann; Jennifer S Pierce; Meghan E Glynn; John L Henshaw; Lauren A McCarthy; Jason T Lotter; Monty Liong; Brent L Finley
Journal:  Toxicol Rep       Date:  2015-08-14

6.  Characterization of naturally occurring airborne diacetyl concentrations associated with the preparation and consumption of unflavored coffee.

Authors:  Jennifer S Pierce; Anders Abelmann; Jason T Lotter; Chris Comerford; Kara Keeton; Brent L Finley
Journal:  Toxicol Rep       Date:  2015-08-18
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.