OBJECTIVES: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate evidence-based strategies for increasing the delivery of smoking cessation treatments in primary care clinics. METHODS: The review included studies published before January 1, 2009. The pooled odds-ratio (OR) was calculated for intervention group versus control group for practitioner performance for "5As" (Ask, Advise, Assess, Assist and Arrange) delivery and smoking abstinence. Multi-component interventions were defined as interventions which combined two or more intervention strategies. RESULTS: Thirty-seven trials met eligibility criteria. Evidence from multiple large-scale trials was found to support the efficacy of multi-component interventions in increasing "5As" delivery. The pooled OR for multi-component interventions compared to control was 1.79 [95% CI 1.6-2.1] for "ask", 1.6 [95% CI 1.4-1.8] for "advice", 9.3 [95% CI 6.8-12.8] for "assist" (quit date) and 3.5 [95% CI 2.8-4.2] for "assist" (prescribe medications). Evidence was also found to support the value of practice-level interventions in increasing 5As delivery. Adjunct counseling [OR 1.7; 95% CI 1.5-2.0] and multi-component interventions [OR 2.2; 95% CI 1.7-2.8] were found to significantly increase smoking abstinence. CONCLUSION: Multi-component interventions improve smoking outcomes in primary care settings. Future trials should attempt to isolate which components of multi-component interventions are required to optimize cost-effectiveness.
OBJECTIVES: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate evidence-based strategies for increasing the delivery of smoking cessation treatments in primary care clinics. METHODS: The review included studies published before January 1, 2009. The pooled odds-ratio (OR) was calculated for intervention group versus control group for practitioner performance for "5As" (Ask, Advise, Assess, Assist and Arrange) delivery and smoking abstinence. Multi-component interventions were defined as interventions which combined two or more intervention strategies. RESULTS: Thirty-seven trials met eligibility criteria. Evidence from multiple large-scale trials was found to support the efficacy of multi-component interventions in increasing "5As" delivery. The pooled OR for multi-component interventions compared to control was 1.79 [95% CI 1.6-2.1] for "ask", 1.6 [95% CI 1.4-1.8] for "advice", 9.3 [95% CI 6.8-12.8] for "assist" (quit date) and 3.5 [95% CI 2.8-4.2] for "assist" (prescribe medications). Evidence was also found to support the value of practice-level interventions in increasing 5As delivery. Adjunct counseling [OR 1.7; 95% CI 1.5-2.0] and multi-component interventions [OR 2.2; 95% CI 1.7-2.8] were found to significantly increase smoking abstinence. CONCLUSION: Multi-component interventions improve smoking outcomes in primary care settings. Future trials should attempt to isolate which components of multi-component interventions are required to optimize cost-effectiveness.
Authors: Thomas H Brandon; Vani N Simmons; Steven K Sutton; Marina Unrod; Paul T Harrell; Cathy D Meade; Benjamin M Craig; Ji-Hyun Lee; Lauren R Meltzer Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2016-02-08 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Li-Shiun Chen; Timothy B Baker; Jeanette M Korpecki; Kelly E Johnson; Jaime P Hook; Ross C Brownson; Laura J Bierut Journal: Psychiatr Serv Date: 2018-06-01 Impact factor: 3.084
Authors: Robert T Adsit; Bradley M Fox; Thanos Tsiolis; Carolyn Ogland; Michelle Simerson; Linda M Vind; Sean M Bell; Amy D Skora; Timothy B Baker; Michael C Fiore Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2014-09 Impact factor: 3.046
Authors: Nan Jiang; Nina Siman; Charles M Cleland; Nancy Van Devanter; Trang Nguyen; Nam Nguyen; Donna Shelley Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2019-10-26 Impact factor: 4.244