Literature DB >> 20599339

Disparities in quality of care for colon cancer between hospitals in the Netherlands.

M A G Elferink1, M W J M Wouters, P Krijnen, V E P P Lemmens, M L E A Jansen-Landheer, C J H van de Velde, S Siesling, R A E M Tollenaar.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Aim of this study was to describe treatment patterns and outcome according to region, and according to hospital types and volumes among patients with colon cancer in the Netherlands.
METHODS: All patients with invasive colon carcinoma diagnosed in the period 2001-2006 were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Logistic regression analyses were performed to examine the influence of relevant factors on the odds of having adequate lymph node evaluation, receiving adjuvant chemotherapy and postoperative mortality. Relative survival analysis was used to estimate relative excess risk of dying according to hospital type and volume.
RESULTS: In total, 39 907 patients were selected. Patients diagnosed in a university hospital had a higher odds (OR 2.47; 95% CI 2.19-2.78) and patients diagnosed in a hospital with >100 colon carcinoma diagnoses annually had a lower odds (OR 0.70; 95% CI 0.64-0.77) of having >/=10 lymph nodes evaluated. The odds of receiving adjuvant chemotherapy was lower in patients diagnosed in teaching hospitals (OR 0.85; 95% CI 0.73-0.98) and university hospitals (OR 0.56; 95% CI 0.45-0.70) compared to patients diagnosed in non-teaching hospitals. Funnel plots showed large variation in these two outcome measures between individual hospitals. No differences in postoperative mortality were found between hospital types or volumes. Patients diagnosed in university hospitals and patients diagnosed in hospitals with >50 diagnoses of colon carcinoma per year had a better survival.
CONCLUSIONS: Variation in treatment and outcome of patients with colon cancer in the Netherlands was revealed, with differences between hospital types and volumes. However, variation seemed mainly based on the level of the individual hospital. Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20599339     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2010.05.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0748-7983            Impact factor:   4.424


  12 in total

1.  Practice parameters for early colon cancer management: Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (Società Italiana di Chirurgia Colo-Rettale; SICCR) guidelines.

Authors:  F Bianco; A Arezzo; F Agresta; C Coco; R Faletti; Z Krivocapic; G Rotondano; G A Santoro; N Vettoretto; S De Franciscis; A Belli; G M Romano
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 3.781

2.  Surgery has a key role for quality assurance of colorectal cancer screening programs: impact of the third level multidisciplinary team on lymph nodal staging.

Authors:  Francesco Bianco; Silvia De Franciscis; Andrea Belli; Maria Di Lena; Antonio Avallone; Maria Antonia Bianco; Sabato Di Marzo; Letizia Gigli; Gianluca Rotondano; Silvana Russo Spena; Fabiana Tatangelo; Alfonso Tempesta; Giovanni Maria Romano
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Influence of hospital type on survival in stage IV colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Nobuaki Hoshino; Suguru Hasegawa; Koya Hida; Kenji Kawada; Ryosuke Okamura; Madoka Hamada; Yoshinori Munemoto; Yoshiharu Sakai; Masahiko Watanabe
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Optimal Treatment Strategy in Rectal Cancer Surgery: Should We Be Cowboys or Chickens?

Authors:  Heleen S Snijders; Nicoline J van Leersum; Daan Henneman; Alexander C de Vries; Rob A E M Tollenaar; Anne M Stiggelbout; Michel W J M Wouters; Jan Willem T Dekker
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Ethnic differences in colon cancer care in the Netherlands: a nationwide registry-based study.

Authors:  M Lamkaddem; M A G Elferink; M C Seeleman; E Dekker; C J A Punt; O Visser; M L Essink-Bot
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 4.430

6.  Hospital Teaching Status and Patients' Outcomes After Colon Cancer Surgery.

Authors:  Julia T van Groningen; Eric H Eddes; Hans F J Fabry; Marc W A van Tilburg; Ernst J van Nieuwenhoven; Yvonne Snel; Perla J Marang-van de Mheen; Mirre E de Noo
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Variation in guideline adherence in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma care: impact of patient and hospital characteristics.

Authors:  Jozette J C Stienen; Rosella P M G Hermens; Lianne Wennekes; Saskia A M van de Schans; Richard W M van der Maazen; Helena M Dekker; Janine Liefers; Johan H J M van Krieken; Nicole M A Blijlevens; Petronella B Ottevanger
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-08-08       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  The impact of organisational external peer review on colorectal cancer treatment and survival in the Netherlands.

Authors:  M J Kilsdonk; B A C van Dijk; R Otter; S Siesling; W H van Harten
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  The Evaluation of More Lymph Nodes in Colon Cancer Is Associated with Improved Survival in Patients of All Ages.

Authors:  Wouter B Aan de Stegge; Barbara L van Leeuwen; Marloes A G Elferink; Geertruida H de Bock
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Hospital variation in sphincter-preservation rates in rectal cancer treatment: results of a population-based study in the Netherlands.

Authors:  T Koëter; L C F de Nes; D K Wasowicz; D D E Zimmerman; R H A Verhoeven; M A Elferink; J H W de Wilt
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2021-07-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.