Literature DB >> 20599294

Validation and response to treatment of a pruritus self-assessment tool in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis.

Alice Gottlieb1, Jingyuan Feng, David J Harrison, Denise Globe.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pruritus is a common symptom of psoriasis. In many clinical trials of psoriasis treatments, severity of pruritus is a patient-reported outcome.
OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate a patient-reported pruritus self-assessment tool using data from clinical trials of a tumor necrosis factor blocker.
METHODS: The validity of the patient-reported 6-point pruritus assessment tool (0 = none to 5 = severe) was determined using data from a phase III trial of etanercept, a tumor necrosis factor blocker. The performance of the pruritus assessment tool was then evaluated using data from two large etanercept trials.
RESULTS: The pruritus assessment tool was validated and deemed to have good test-retest reliability (kappa coefficient = 0.71; 95% confidence interval = 0.62-0.80) and responsiveness (standardized response mean = 1.28; effect size = 1.63, responsiveness statistic = 1.54). Improvements in pruritus scores correlated with improvements in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index after 8 weeks of etanercept therapy in two phase III trials. LIMITATIONS: The pruritus assessment is validated only for patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, and may not be applicable to other patient populations.
CONCLUSIONS: The pruritus assessment tool is a valid measurement of pruritus intensity in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis and can discriminate between patients on and off treatment.
Copyright © 2009 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20599294     DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2009.09.049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol        ISSN: 0190-9622            Impact factor:   11.527


  2 in total

1.  [Pruritus and psoriasis : an important but frequently underestimated relation].

Authors:  E Weisshaar
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 0.751

2.  Automated, computer-guided PASI measurements by digital image analysis versus conventional physicians' PASI calculations: study protocol for a comparative, single-centre, observational study.

Authors:  Christine Fink; Lorenz Uhlmann; Christina Klose; Holger A Haenssle
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 2.692

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.