Literature DB >> 20598995

Effect on bleeding, time to revascularization, and one-year clinical outcomes of the radial approach during primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

Dabit Arzamendi1, Hung Quoc Ly, Jean-François Tanguay, Mark Yan Yee Chan, Pierre Chevallereau, Richard Gallo, Reda Ibrahim, Philippe L'Allier, Sylvie Levesque, Gilbert Gosselin, Pierre Deguise, Michel Joyal, Jean Gregoire, Raoul Bonan, Jacques Crepeau, Serge Doucet.   

Abstract

The radial approach during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been reported to reduce the incidence of bleeding complications. However, the radial approach still accounts for <10% of procedures worldwide and only 1% in the United States. Our objective was to compare the effect of radial versus femoral vascular access on the time to reperfusion, incidence of bleeding complications, and overall clinical outcomes in the setting of primary PCI. We prospectively collected data on all patients undergoing primary PCI at the Montreal Heart Institute from April 1, 2007 to March 30, 2008. The time to revascularization and major bleeding were prespecified as a co-primary end point, and major adverse cardiac events, including death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization within 12 months, were considered a secondary end point. A total of 489 patients were included in the present longitudinal cohort study, 234 in the femoral group and 254 in the radial group. In the propensity-adjusted model, the use of the femoral approach was a strong independent predictor of bleeding (odds ratio 4.22, 95% confidence interval 3.17 to 10.60). No significant difference between the radial and femoral groups was observed relative to the time to revascularization (21.4 +/- 11.8 minutes vs 22.8 +/- 10.3 minutes, respectively; p = 0.68). Moreover, the radial approach was associated with a decreased risk of major adverse cardiac events (odds ratio 0.31, 95% confidence interval 0.10 to 0.94). In conclusion, primary PCI using the radial approach was associated with a fourfold reduction in major bleeding, without compromising the time to revascularization. Moreover, the radial approach was associated with a significant reduction in major adverse cardiac events at 12 months. Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20598995     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.02.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  8 in total

Review 1.  Vascular access and closure in coronary angiography and percutaneous intervention.

Authors:  Robert A Byrne; Salvatore Cassese; Maryam Linhardt; Adnan Kastrati
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2012-11-27       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 2.  Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Major Cardiovascular Outcomes for Radial Versus Femoral Access in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Authors:  Ernesto Ruiz-Rodriguez; Ahmed Asfour; Georges Lolay; Khaled M Ziada; Ahmed K Abdel-Latif
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 0.954

3.  Comparison of short- and medium-term clinical outcomes between transradial approach and transfemoral approach in a high-volume PCI heart center in China.

Authors:  Peiyuan He; Yuejin Yang; Shubin Qiao; Bo Xu; Min Yao; Yongjian Wu; Jinqing Yuan; Jue Chen; Haibo Liu; Jun Dai; Xiao Yang; Xinran Tang; Yang Wang; Wei Li; Runlin Gao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Percutaneous coronary intervention in the elderly with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Lei Gao; Xin Hu; Yu-Qi Liu; Qiao Xue; Quan-Zhou Feng
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 4.458

5.  Increased pulse wave transit time after percutaneous coronary intervention procedure in CAD patients.

Authors:  Lizhen Ji; Chengyu Liu; Peng Li; Xinpei Wang; Changchun Liu; Yinglong Hou
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Antiplatelet therapy in acute coronary syndromes: current agents and impact on patient outcomes.

Authors:  Hussam M Tayeb; Adam J Nelson; Scott R Willoughby; Matthew I Worthley
Journal:  Patient Relat Outcome Meas       Date:  2010-12-30

7.  Randomized comparative study of left versus right radial approach in the setting of primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Qiang Fu; Hongyu Hu; Dezhao Wang; Wei Chen; Zhixu Tan; Qun Li; Buxing Chen
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 4.458

Review 8.  Radial artery occlusion after percutaneous coronary interventions - an underestimated issue.

Authors:  Janusz Sławin; Piotr Kubler; Andrzej Szczepański; Joanna Piątek; Michał Stępkowski; Krzysztof Reczuch
Journal:  Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej       Date:  2013-11-18       Impact factor: 1.426

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.