Literature DB >> 20598897

Arthrocentesis and stabilizing splint are the treatment of choice for acute intermittent closed lock in patients with bruxism.

Walid A Ghanem1.   

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the long-term outcome of arthrocentesis and stabilizing splints for the treatment of acute closed lock in patients with bruxism. This study included 20 female patients who were divided into two equal groups and who underwent temporomandibular joint (TMJ) arthrocentesis. Patients in the first group wore a full coverage stabilizing splint following arthrocentesis. The second group underwent arthrocentesis only. The scores for preoperative maximal mouth opening (MMO), protrusive movement (PM), contra-lateral (CL) movement (CLM) and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores for pain and dysfunction were compared with the follow-up scores obtained by the questionnaire and clinical examination. Statistical evaluation of the baseline and follow-up data was made with the t-test. The follow-up period was 12 months. There was a significant (P<0.001) increase in the MMO, CL and PMs during the longer-term follow-up period for group 1, while there was a significant decrease (P<0.019) in these parameters for group 2. The pain and dysfunction levels at follow-up were significantly (P<0.001) lower than the preoperative values. Ninety percent of patients in group 2 showed pain and dysfunction scores that increased significantly (P<0.001) and ranged from moderate to severe. The overall success rate was 90% for group 1 and 30% for group 2. In conclusion, arthrocentesis and a stabilizing splint are the treatment of choice for acute closed lock of short duration in young patients with bruxism.
Copyright © 2010 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20598897     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2010.05.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg        ISSN: 1010-5182            Impact factor:   2.078


  4 in total

1.  A comparison of the effects of Methylprednisolone Acetate, Sodium Hyaluronate and Tenoxicam in the treatment of non-reducing disc displacement of the temporomandibular joint.

Authors:  G Yapici-Yavuz; G Şimşek-Kaya; H Oğul
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2018-05-01

2.  Evaluation of Patient Comfort and Impact of Different Anesthesia Techniques on the Temporomandibular Joint Arthrocentesis Applications by Comparing Gow-Gates Mandibular Block Anesthesia with Auriculotemporal Nerve Block.

Authors:  Onur Atalı; Elif Özçelik; Onur Gönül; Hasan Garip
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 2.667

3.  Clinicoradiological evaluation of dermis-fat grafts after temporomandibular joint discectomy: A retrospective study.

Authors:  Celal Candirli; Alparslan Esen; Fatih Taskesen; Salih Celik; Banu Cakir
Journal:  Natl J Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2012-01

4.  Influencing factor on the prognosis of arthrocentesis.

Authors:  Yoon Ho Kim; Tae Min Jeong; Kang Mi Pang; Seung Il Song
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014-08-26
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.