Literature DB >> 20598480

Four-year randomized prospective comparison of percutaneous ePTFE/nitinol self-expanding stent graft versus prosthetic femoral-popliteal bypass in the treatment of superficial femoral artery occlusive disease.

Karen McQuade1, Dennis Gable, Greg Pearl, Brian Theune, Steve Black.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This is a randomized prospective study comparing the treatment of superficial femoral artery occlusive disease percutaneously with an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE)/nitinol self-expanding stent graft (stent graft) versus surgical femoral to above-knee popliteal artery bypass with synthetic graft material.
METHODS: One hundred limbs in 86 patients with superficial femoral artery occlusive disease were evaluated from March 2004 to May 2005. Patient symptoms included both claudication and limb threatening ischemia with or without tissue loss. Trans-Atlantic InterSociety Consensus (TASC II) A (n = 18), B (n = 56), C (n = 11), and D (n = 15) lesions were included. Patients were randomized prospectively into one of two treatment groups; a percutaneous treatment group (group A; n = 50) with angioplasty and placement of one or more stent grafts, or a surgical treatment group (group B; n = 50) with a femoral to above-knee popliteal artery bypass using synthetic conduit (Dacron or ePTFE). Patients were followed for 48 months. Follow-up evaluation included clinical assessment, physical examination, ankle-brachial indices, and color flow duplex sonography at 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 36, and 48 months.
RESULTS: Mean total lesion length of the treated arterial segment in the stent graft group was 25.6 cm (SD = 15 cm). The stent graft group demonstrated a primary patency of 72%, 63%, 63%, and 59% with a secondary patency of 83%, 74%, 74%, and 74% at 12, 24, 36, and 48 months, respectively. The surgical femoral-popliteal group demonstrated a primary patency of 76%, 63%, 63%, and 58% with a secondary patency of 86%, 76%, 76%, and 71% at 12, 24, 36, and 48 months, respectively. No statistical difference was found between the two groups with respect to primary (P = .807) or secondary (P = .891) patency.
CONCLUSION: Management of superficial femoral artery occlusive disease with percutaneous stent grafts exhibits similar primary patency at 4-year (48 month) follow up when compared with conventional femoral-popliteal artery bypass grafting with synthetic conduit. This treatment method may offer an alternative to treatment of the superficial femoral artery segment for revascularization when prosthetic bypass is being considered or when autologous conduit is unavailable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20598480     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.03.071

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  22 in total

1.  Results for primary bypass versus primary angioplasty/stent for intermittent claudication due to superficial femoral artery occlusive disease.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Siracuse; Kristina A Giles; Frank B Pomposelli; Allen D Hamdan; Mark C Wyers; Elliot L Chaikof; April E Nedeau; Marc L Schermerhorn
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 4.268

Review 2.  [Stent-assisted recanalization of femoropopliteal arterial occlusive disease. Influence of stent design on patency rates].

Authors:  M Treitl; M F Reiser; K M Treitl
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 3.  Hybrid interventions in limb salvage.

Authors:  Tam T T Huynh; Carlos F Bechara
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2013-04

Review 4.  Endovascular techniques in limb salvage: stents.

Authors:  Hosam F El-Sayed
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2013-04

Review 5.  Bypass surgery for chronic lower limb ischaemia.

Authors:  George A Antoniou; George S Georgiadis; Stavros A Antoniou; Ragai R Makar; Jonathan D Smout; Francesco Torella
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-04-03

Review 6.  Contemporary treatment for critical ischemia: the evidence for interventional radiology or surgery.

Authors:  Keith Hussey; Sivanathan Chandramohan
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.513

7.  SUrgical versus PERcutaneous Bypass: SUPERB-trial; Heparin-bonded endoluminal versus surgical femoro-popliteal bypass: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Mare M A Lensvelt; Suzanne Holewijn; Wilbert M Fritschy; Otmar R M Wikkeling; Laurens A van Walraven; Bas M Wallis de Vries; Clark J Zeebregts; Michel M P J Reijnen
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2011-07-18       Impact factor: 2.279

8.  Future research and therapeutic applications of human stem cells: general, regulatory, and bioethical aspects.

Authors:  Antonio Liras
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2010-12-10       Impact factor: 5.531

Review 9.  Emerging stent and balloon technologies in the femoropopliteal arteries.

Authors:  Georgios Pastromas; Konstantinos Katsanos; Miltiadis Krokidis; Dimitrios Karnabatidis; Stavros Spiliopoulos
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-02-04

10.  Life-threatening bleeding after pelvic lymphadenectomy for cervical cancer: endovascular management of ruptured false aneurysm of the external iliac artery.

Authors:  Enzo Ricciardi; Giampaolo Di Martino; Paolo Maniglio; Mauro Schimberni; Antonio Frega; Marina Jakimovska; Borut Kobal; Massimo Moscarini
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-07-16       Impact factor: 2.754

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.